Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Human rights protect all humans. The whole point is to protect vulnerable, weak humans who are unable to protect themselves. The idiotic assertion that human rights don't exist for the dependent, vulnerable and weak is ignorant and just not true.Listen you knucklehead, if you aren't intelligent enough to talk to me without being stupid, then we'll end this ridiculousness now.
they
murder another human.
another
What is a hue man , and what are hew men ?Human rights protect all humans.
Some male dongle is disturbing a fragile menagerie of perfectly , non deformed , baby dolls .The whole point is to protect vulnerable, weak humans who are unable to protect themselves.
The term idiotic alludes to idiom .The idiotic assertion that human rights don't exist for the dependent, vulnerable and weak is ignorant and just not true.
Say no to drugs...and acid is a drug." Sew Fist Tree Idiom Addict "
* Sum Times Nick Names Her Hymns Nebulous *
What is a hue man , and what are hew men ?
" Human rights protect all humans. " is a false statement because " Human rights " is not an entity capable of issuing a retort , or a reprise , for violations of some conjecture for hue man wrights .
Alternatively , " Humans protect all human rights ( sic ) . " is a true statement because hew men are an entity capable of issuing a retort for violations of some conjecture for hue mammon wrights , though it may be false when hew men are not actually capable of " protecting " , that is issuing a retort , for all violations of conjectured hue men wrights .
* Oh Please For Heaven Sake Think Of The Children Melodrama *
Some male dongle is disturbing a fragile menagerie of perfectly , non deformed , baby dolls .
* False Presumptions About Laws of Nature No Will Fully Ignorant Here *
The term idiotic alludes to idiom .
An idiom may be understood , however an idiom can be resigned to being inconsistent by contradiction , or including an inability to resolve a paradox , and therefore not be valid for those identifications of language , whereby an idiom might qualify as being idiotic and its implementation an idiocy .
An idiom is a language based on phonetic eponyms , which are composites of morphemes , where morphemes are a smallest inflection of sound with which a meaning is associated with a symbol , such as a consonant or vowel , and where eponyms are created through combinations of morphemes .
The assimilation of idioms might result in idiosyncrasities .
Except the ones the US gov't ignores via mickey mouse 'laws'.Human rights protect all humans.
Dr Jerome LeJeune,
www.papalencyclicals.net
How a bioethicist and doctor sees abortion
Following the leak of a draft decision by the Supreme Court that would overturn Roe v. Wade, the Medical School's Louise King discusses how the potential ruling might affect providers.
AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Her work touches questions we can answer and questions we can't. But her main focus is elsewhere: ‘the patient in front of me.’
Alvin PowellHarvard Staff Writer
How a bioethicist and doctor sees abortion — Harvard Gazette
Director of Medical School's Center for Bioethics discusses ethical dimensions of abortion and how a ruling against Roe might affect providers.news.harvard.edu
Here are four places where different embryologists have claimed individual human life begins. There's fertilization. There's gastrulation. There's the human acquisition of the eeg pattern, and then there's birth itself. So, let's go through a little bit on each of them. fertilization, that's this genetic approach, that you are that you become a person when you get your DNA. And Lejeune, one of the leading geneticists, pediatric geneticists said, "Oh, that takes place at fecundation, at fertilization at conception, because it tells us that the constitution of this person is unique to this person.
Scott Gilbert 220905^aa Nov 13, 2012 | When Does Personhood Begin? The Science and the Rhetoric – Science & Justice Research Center
Okay? So that's one position, life begins at fertilization.
A record number of Americans (71 percent) are opposed to overturning the landmark Supreme Court ruling that recognized abortion as a woman's constitutional right.”
That significant majority of Americans are cognizant that women are under assault and because they are not slaves to the heretical Christian “pro-life” crusade, they support all women’s right to control their own bodies. In spite of religious Republicans and evangelical extremists’ efforts, decent Americans are opposed to the current theocratic crusade to regulate and control women by overturning Roe v. Wade.
Obviously, religious Republicans in thrall of the Vatican could not possibly care less what a significant percentage of the population wants – particularly when controlling women and abridging their constitutional freedoms is at stake and under “their” theocratic purview.
Moreover, a recent Supreme Court ruling in lowly Kansas determined that the religious Republican assault on women’s bodily autonomy is abominable and strictly prohibited under the Constitution. That High Court ruled that women enjoy constitutional freedoms, and protection from religious Republican men, “to control their own bodies as a basic human right” – a right the Vatican has convinced Republicans and their evangelical extremist supporters is an attack on their perceived religious freedom to regulate and control women. (author bold)
The recent spate of Republican states criminalizing women who choose a legal medical procedure is, of course, driven by evangelical extremists bound to obey the 1968 papal encyclical issued from the Vatican to help male religious leaders worldwide “regulate” women’s lives by controlling their bodies.
Many will argue violently that evangelical fanatics hate Catholics in general, and the Vatican in particular, with honest-to-dog religious passion. However, although that may appear to be true, it does nothing to dispute the fact that the so-called “pro-life” movement is a Catholic construct being executed by religious Republican men.
<Humanae Vitae>
“Human life begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual.” “A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo).”the patient in front of me.’
dvng.22.07.19 #3,640 Again... not a religious argument. A scientific fact based upon empirical evidence.
But Saint Ding primarily cites Catholic Scientists who do not see a patient in front of them; they see ONLY Baby Fetus through the doctrine of Humanae Vitae.
dvng.23.20.24 #515
00465 nf.22.10.25 #465
Humanae Vitae On the Regulation of Human Births - Papal Encyclicals
To the Venerable Patriarchs, Archbishops, Bishops and other local Ordinaries in Peace and Communion with the Apostolic See, to Priests.
nf.23.10.16 #11,488
100%Abortion ends human life. When when a woman chooses to end her pregnancy, she kills a human being, no if’s and’s or butts.
metaphysical contention
choosing to do wrong.
If we start from the position that ending a human life is wrong then there must be a punishment. I think it should be a misdemeanor. With increasing penalties for each additional one. That and they have to acknowledge that they are ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again. And that of their own accord they are freely choosing to end that life.dvng.23.10.16 #674 to nf.23.10.15 #672 “the beginning of each of us as a unique individual . . . . “Keith L. Moore”
nf.23.10.16 #686 to dvng.23.10.16 #674 “Please refer to nf.23.10.16 #11,488“ . . . . . “Meanwhile, I absolutely believe with all my mortal human mental might of brain superiority over every other species on earth including MAGA mammals, that human life begins at fertilization in the process during which a male gamete or sperm unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual. A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo) and a woman has a right to kill it because full term pregnancy is her risk and not fucking Keith L. Moore’s fucking risk whoever in the name of Jesus he thinks he is. “ nf.23.10.16 #686
dvng.23.10.16 #687 to nf.23.10.16 #686
“Then she is choosing to do wrong.”
If you are in no way related to the “she” what does her wrong have to do with you Saint Ding? That is assuming the unprotected sex and the medical procedure were done in private and neither were performed on the public square. Where is the “harm” or hindrance or restriction to your pursuit of life liberty and pursuit of happiness from a not public act?
nf.23.19.16 #11,491
As a rational theist I prefer multicultural and multiracial public educators of any or no religious faith teach my grandkids reading riting and rithmatic and how to be good citizens without bringing supernatural hocus pocus that must be believed into it.6. Christianity has done what no government can ever do, namely teach morality and civility.
Unless it's coerced. In which case the abortionists and the other ppl who lie to, abuse, and shame vulnerable women into "chhosing" to kill their children, should be prosecutedIf we start from the position that ending a human life is wrong then there must be a punishment. I think it should be a misdemeanor. With increasing penalties for each additional one. That and they have to acknowledge that they are ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again. And that of their own accord they are freely choosing to end that life.
That way it is recognized as being wrong, but mercy is granted to the woman because of this unique situation. But she has to admit she is doing wrong. This will satisfy society and the woman without promoting abortion.
Where's the problem with this?
So you're a bigot.dvng.21.08.11 #6
As a rational theist I prefer multicultural and multiracial public educators of any or no religious faith teach my grandkids reading riting and rithmatic and how to be good citizens without bringing supernatural hocus pocus that must be believed into it.
If you want to teach my grandkids your Christian morality Saint Ding be moral people and attract them by example instead of burning fucking books and spreading homophobic and xenophobic fear and hate and don’t elect president’s that brag about grabbing wonen by their pussy and lie that he only list because the election was stolen and try to overturn the loss of that ekection by mobocracy and fraudulent electors schemes that violated the law snd constitution.
nf.23.10,16
If we start from the position that ending a human life is wrong then there must be a punishment. I think it should be a misdemeanor. With increasing penalties for each additional one. That and they have to acknowledge that they are ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again. And that of their own accord they are freely choosing to end that life.dvng.21.08.11 #6
As a rational theist I prefer multicultural and multiracial public educators of any or no religious faith teach my grandkids reading riting and rithmatic and how to be good citizens without bringing supernatural hocus pocus that must be believed into it.
If you want to teach my grandkids your Christian morality Saint Ding be moral people and attract them by example instead of burning fucking books and spreading homophobic and xenophobic fear and hate and don’t elect president’s that brag about grabbing women by their pussy and lie that he only lost because the election was stolen and try to overturn the loss of that election by mobocracy and fraudulent electors schemes that violated the law and the Constitution.
nf.23.10.16 #11,493
Problem's in your head. There is never a time that there is non-existence. Life is always already occurring, existent, in both egg and sperm.If we start from the position that ending a human life is wrong then there must be a punishment. I think it should be a misdemeanor. With increasing penalties for each additional one. That and they have to acknowledge that they are ending a human life; one that has never existed before and will never exist again. And that of their own accord they are freely choosing to end that life.
That way it is recognized as being wrong, but mercy is granted to the woman because of this unique situation. But she has to admit she is doing wrong. This will satisfy society and the woman without promoting abortion.
Where's the problem with this?
sperm and eggs in and of themselves are not genetically distinct NEW human beings.Problem's in your head. There is never a time that there is non-existence. Life is always already occurring, existent, in both egg and sperm.
dehumanize
humanize
