The accuracy of the manuscripts is unparalleled in antiquity.You will catch more flies with honey than you will with vinegar.Writing in the language that one knows only proves that they wrote in the language that they knew.there were no ORTHODOX churches at that time-----the schism that led to
the EASTERN ORTHODOX sect of Christianity hadn't happened yet. The
OT that jews read was written mostly in Hebrew----and some of it in Aramaic.
None of it was in greek or latin. HOWEVER romans did like greek and used it
lots even before the schism. The Septuagint which is a greek translation of
the OT ----came about something like third century BCE
Christianity broke off from Judaism and spread to people of other nations. It isn't surprising that their account was written in their language. The tradition was passed down orally just as it was to Moses until he recorded it in Hebrew. You think the Hebrew language existed 3000 years before Moses? No. He recorded it in Hebrew because Hebrew was the language he knew.
your posts continue to be silly, dingbat. Why would I "think" that Hebrew
existed 3000 years before Moses? Hebrew is rooted in Mesopotamia
-----a branch off.------it is attributed to Abraham and his merry gang who DID
NOT precede moses by 3000 years-----less than 1000. As to the NT----
what happened to the theory that Matthew and Luke etc etc----who WROTE
their books--------were contemporaries and even supper mates of Jesus?
(Hebrew and Aramaic) You claimed something about NT "ORIGINAL
MANUSCRIPTS"
flies damage freshly written manuscripts--------by walking thru the wet ink.
Sometimes they are responsible for TRANSMITTED ERRORS
the accuracy of what "manuscripts"? How do you know that the
original accounts were accurate. ? copies can remain true for a long
time-------and it really was not all that LONG OF A TIME