Romans 13, in full content.

there were no ORTHODOX churches at that time-----the schism that led to
the EASTERN ORTHODOX sect of Christianity hadn't happened yet. The
OT that jews read was written mostly in Hebrew----and some of it in Aramaic.
None of it was in greek or latin. HOWEVER romans did like greek and used it
lots even before the schism. The Septuagint which is a greek translation of
the OT ----came about something like third century BCE
Writing in the language that one knows only proves that they wrote in the language that they knew.

Christianity broke off from Judaism and spread to people of other nations. It isn't surprising that their account was written in their language. The tradition was passed down orally just as it was to Moses until he recorded it in Hebrew. You think the Hebrew language existed 3000 years before Moses? No. He recorded it in Hebrew because Hebrew was the language he knew.

your posts continue to be silly, dingbat. Why would I "think" that Hebrew
existed 3000 years before Moses? Hebrew is rooted in Mesopotamia
-----a branch off.------it is attributed to Abraham and his merry gang who DID
NOT precede moses by 3000 years-----less than 1000. As to the NT----
what happened to the theory that Matthew and Luke etc etc----who WROTE
their books--------were contemporaries and even supper mates of Jesus?
(Hebrew and Aramaic) You claimed something about NT "ORIGINAL
MANUSCRIPTS"
You will catch more flies with honey than you will with vinegar.

flies damage freshly written manuscripts--------by walking thru the wet ink.
Sometimes they are responsible for TRANSMITTED ERRORS
The accuracy of the manuscripts is unparalleled in antiquity.

the accuracy of what "manuscripts"? How do you know that the
original accounts were accurate. ? copies can remain true for a long
time-------and it really was not all that LONG OF A TIME
 
Apparently you are unaware that the beginning of the Bible is the history of all men and that it was not told in Hebrew but was later recorded in Hebrew. Same same.

you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't believe the written account of your own people? Oy vey!
 
Writing in the language that one knows only proves that they wrote in the language that they knew.

Christianity broke off from Judaism and spread to people of other nations. It isn't surprising that their account was written in their language. The tradition was passed down orally just as it was to Moses until he recorded it in Hebrew. You think the Hebrew language existed 3000 years before Moses? No. He recorded it in Hebrew because Hebrew was the language he knew.

your posts continue to be silly, dingbat. Why would I "think" that Hebrew
existed 3000 years before Moses? Hebrew is rooted in Mesopotamia
-----a branch off.------it is attributed to Abraham and his merry gang who DID
NOT precede moses by 3000 years-----less than 1000. As to the NT----
what happened to the theory that Matthew and Luke etc etc----who WROTE
their books--------were contemporaries and even supper mates of Jesus?
(Hebrew and Aramaic) You claimed something about NT "ORIGINAL
MANUSCRIPTS"
You will catch more flies with honey than you will with vinegar.

flies damage freshly written manuscripts--------by walking thru the wet ink.
Sometimes they are responsible for TRANSMITTED ERRORS
The accuracy of the manuscripts is unparalleled in antiquity.

the accuracy of what "manuscripts"? How do you know that the
original accounts were accurate. ? copies can remain true for a long
time-------and it really was not all that LONG OF A TIME
The 24,000 written manuscripts chronicling the ministry of Christ.
 
24000 idiots who belonged to the same personality cult.. ----something like 24000 stories about robin hood and maid marion
 
you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't believe the written account of your own people? Oy vey!

Constantine rewrote the Torah, and Cicero rewrote all the Chinese stuff and most of Mesopotamian history. Sooner or later rosie is going to put us all in our places and post all the videos of this she's been shown by her Hasedi racist friends. Nero was a Jewish convert, converted by his Jewish wife, and he rewrote a lot of Old Testament stuff, too, when he was taking a break from killing Xians to please his wife.
 
[
The 24,000 written manuscripts chronicling the ministry of Christ.

Yes, it's all very very annoying to Hasidic racists and gnostic fraudsters, and all the assorted deviants who keep trying to make up their own new improved hippie Jesus to fit some stupid dope-addled fantasy play from the 1960''s.
 
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't believe the written account of your own people? Oy vey!

Constantine rewrote the Torah, and Cicero rewrote all the Chinese stuff and most of Mesopotamian history. Sooner or later rosie is going to put us all in our places and post all the videos of this she's been shown by her Hasedi racist friends. Nero was a Jewish convert, converted by his Jewish wife, and he rewrote a lot of Old Testament stuff, too, when he was taking a break from killing Xians to please his wife.

do you write the weekly Khutbah Jumaat?
 
Apparently you are unaware that the beginning of the Bible is the history of all men and that it was not told in Hebrew but was later recorded in Hebrew. Same same.

you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't even know that the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia.

No wonder you are an atheist Jew. You don't even know your own religion. Probably because you spend so much time fretting over mine.
 
you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't believe the written account of your own people? Oy vey!

Constantine rewrote the Torah, and Cicero rewrote all the Chinese stuff and most of Mesopotamian history. Sooner or later rosie is going to put us all in our places and post all the videos of this she's been shown by her Hasedi racist friends. Nero was a Jewish convert, converted by his Jewish wife, and he rewrote a lot of Old Testament stuff, too, when he was taking a break from killing Xians to please his wife.

do you write the weekly Khutbah Jumaat?
That's pretty funny coming from a supposed Jew who didn't know that the Tower of Babel was an allegorical account of a historical event.
 
Apparently you are unaware that the beginning of the Bible is the history of all men and that it was not told in Hebrew but was later recorded in Hebrew. Same same.

you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
And for the record it absolutely does explain why the commonality of accounts meant they once shared common beliefs.

Of course if an allegorical account of an actual historical event which describes how a common people scattered themselves isn't enough proof for you then maybe the same traditions practiced by the early Chinese dynasties would.
 
you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't even know that the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia.

No wonder you are an atheist Jew. You don't even know your own religion. Probably because you spend so much time fretting over mine.

Well, without the scapegoating of da evul Xians for their long history of Jewish racism and failures caused by that, they're left with themselves and their own self-inflicted failures, so naturally some of them don't like that one bit. Da evul Xians are just big giant doody heads for not acknowledging the racial superiority of Chasidics and refusing to roll over and die because Chasidics think they should.
 
I guess we will have to wait a little longer for all that stuff Constantine rewrote. Suddenly after years of babbling about it constantly it appears nobody actually knows anything he rewrote ... How can that be?
 
you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't even know that the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia.

No wonder you are an atheist Jew. You don't even know your own religion. Probably because you spend so much time fretting over mine.

The interpretation of the TOWER OF BABEL story is a matter of conjecture-----no question it is an allegory. HOWEVER your cynical BS
consisting of snotty ----"you don't even know..." is cute----but even an idiot
like you would understand that the imagery used INCLUDES the egotistical
building of ziggurats-----which ALLEGORICALLY WISE---symbolizes the
evil of your friendly SAINT NIMROD (who actually represents IL PAPA
of rome) I do not know the nature of your "religion". Have you ever
SELF DECLARED?
 
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
You don't even know that the Tower of Babel was the allegorical account of the great migration from Mesopotamia.

No wonder you are an atheist Jew. You don't even know your own religion. Probably because you spend so much time fretting over mine.

Well, without the scapegoating of da evul Xians for their long history of Jewish racism and failures caused by that, they're left with themselves and their own self-inflicted failures, so naturally some of them don't like that one bit. Da evul Xians are just big giant doody heads for not acknowledging the racial superiority of Chasidics and refusing to roll over and die because Chasidics think they should.

are you trying to comment on Chassidim and what you imagine
they think? How long have you imagined that you have insight
into that which other people "think"?
 
I guess we will have to wait a little longer for all that stuff Constantine rewrote. Suddenly after years of babbling about it constantly it appears nobody actually knows anything he rewrote ... How can that be?

the audio visual surveillance of the Nicean council self destructed befoe
it could be transcribed
 
you seem to be referring to the book called "GENESIS" which was,
indeed, WRITTEN in Hebrew. The Odyssey was written in Greek and
the Bhagavad Gita ------in Sanskrit. So unlike the NT which is a
compilation of writings dating back to the lifetime of Jesus and shortly
thereafter. ------the book called ROMANS apparently available to you
in the HANDWRITING of Paul of tarsus and REVELATIONS in the
handwriting of some guy named "john" and the book called LUKE and
ACTS who most likely wrote his originals in Greek------all available to you
------unrevised
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
And for the record it absolutely does explain why the commonality of accounts meant they once shared common beliefs.

Of course if an allegorical account of an actual historical event which describes how a common people scattered themselves isn't enough proof for you then maybe the same traditions practiced by the early Chinese dynasties would.

It is PROOF of nothing any more than the greek accepted belief that
Poseidan gave Odysseus a BAG OF WIND to fuel his sail boat
 
The account of Genesis predates Moses and was passed down orally for thousands of years and was captured as symbols in the written language of the Chinese 1500 years before Moses recorded it. So your argument that the NT was recorded in Greek and other languages is no different than what Moses did.

you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
And for the record it absolutely does explain why the commonality of accounts meant they once shared common beliefs.

Of course if an allegorical account of an actual historical event which describes how a common people scattered themselves isn't enough proof for you then maybe the same traditions practiced by the early Chinese dynasties would.

It is PROOF of nothing any more than the greek accepted belief that
Poseidan gave Odysseus a BAG OF WIND to fuel his sail boat
It is proof of quite a few things. One of which is that you are a fake.
 
you have no way of knowing just WHEN the first account of genesis was
was written-------it is not at all clear that MOSES was the first writer. Lots
and lots of cultures have "creation stories"-----and lots share features----a
fact which does not "prove" that they were acquired from each other
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
And for the record it absolutely does explain why the commonality of accounts meant they once shared common beliefs.

Of course if an allegorical account of an actual historical event which describes how a common people scattered themselves isn't enough proof for you then maybe the same traditions practiced by the early Chinese dynasties would.

It is PROOF of nothing any more than the greek accepted belief that
Poseidan gave Odysseus a BAG OF WIND to fuel his sail boat
It is proof of quite a few things. One of which is that you are a fake.

a fake what? I have never so much as worn a padded bra. How do
people "SCATTER THEMSELVES" ? For the record----the HUMAN
has been very mobile over the earth for a longer period of time than has
existed his LANGUAGE SKILLS-------from speaking thru writing (and
all the way to smoke signals and P. C. It is for this reason that we all---
(not you----but US----we humans) share DNA across the board
 
It was passed down orally, like the NT. We do know it was first recorded 4500 years ago by the Chinese as symbols in their written language. They shared a common belief before the migration from Mesopotamia which is recorded in the OT as the Tower of Babel.

who shared a "common belief"? the Chinese and the people of
Mesopotamia? ------commonalities in legend do not prove CONTACT.
Both the Chinese AND the people of Mesopotamia liked to BUILD UP.
The issue of building a tower to reach "heaven"-----was a kind of realistic
detail of the Genesis story. Impressive buildings was how alpha males
excited women ------all over the world
And for the record it absolutely does explain why the commonality of accounts meant they once shared common beliefs.

Of course if an allegorical account of an actual historical event which describes how a common people scattered themselves isn't enough proof for you then maybe the same traditions practiced by the early Chinese dynasties would.

It is PROOF of nothing any more than the greek accepted belief that
Poseidan gave Odysseus a BAG OF WIND to fuel his sail boat
It is proof of quite a few things. One of which is that you are a fake.

a fake what? I have never so much as worn a padded bra. How do
people "SCATTER THEMSELVES" ? For the record----the HUMAN
has been very mobile over the earth for a longer period of time than has
existed his LANGUAGE SKILLS-------from speaking thru writing (and
all the way to smoke signals and P. C. It is for this reason that we all---
(not you----but US----we humans) share DNA across the board
You never heard of the migration from the cradle of civilization?

Your people captured the event in writing thousands of years after it happened. Of course they were only able to capture it in writing because it was passed down orally. Just like Christianity was.
 

Forum List

Back
Top