Romney Impeachment Speech... WOW

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

This is hardly surprising. It’s no secret that Romney hates Trump.

do you think he voted this way because of hate or because it’s how he truly sees the situation

I think it was inevitable

Do you think it was sincere?

I don’t think much of anything Romney has done over his political career has been sincere.

 

[Slade3200]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

This is hardly surprising. It’s no secret that Romney hates Trump.

do you think he voted this way because of hate or because it’s how he truly sees the situation

I think it was inevitable

Do you think it was sincere?

I don’t think much of anything Romney has done over his political career has been sincere.

does that include this latest speech and reasoning for his vote?

 

[Leo123]

Romney abdicated his responsibility to his Utah constituents by letting his personal opinion get in the way of his job as a Representative. His speech only focuses on his feelings, not the actual evidence of which there was none. A Senator is supposed to represent those who voted for him, not his personal feelings. I think his political career is done.

 

[wamose]

After saying how deeply religious he is, he goes on to make some of the most far fetched and illogical reasons for impeachment any person could imagine. If he's truly religious, one must assume his God either likes to be lied to or that he takes pity on ignoramuses.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

How can it be incredible,, if a president can’t ask about corruption you’re handicapping America.. all of you that are deranged need to get help

A President can ask about corruption. There’s a way to do it. Trump did not do it the right way. It’s incredible that Romney said what he said. He just ranked the rest of his political career to uphold an oath. Agree or disagree you gotta admit that takes balls

The corrupt he inquired about also involved the catcher too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Catcher in the Rye?

Power bottom


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[iceberg]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

he's on the wrong side of history just like his lost presidency.

At least he has principles.

It's a bit disingenuous to say people who disagree with you have no principles.

 

[Coyote]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

he's on the wrong side of history just like his lost presidency.

At least he has principles.

It's a bit disingenuous to say people who disagree with you have no principles.

It would be indeed. If that is what I said.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This is hardly surprising. It’s no secret that Romney hates Trump.

do you think he voted this way because of hate or because it’s how he truly sees the situation

I think it was inevitable

Do you think it was sincere?

I don’t think much of anything Romney has done over his political career has been sincere.

does that include this latest speech and reasoning for his vote?

I believe I already said that

 

[IM2]

Romney went against his party and rightfully so. Republicans are on the wrong side of history here.

 

[Jitss617]

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a YES, on the abuse of power article and a No on obstruction of congress.

I didn't see it and I'm not going to see it now
his vote was enough for me.to know he's one and done

Stay ignorant my friend

says the dumdass who ignorantly remains a leftist.

 

[iceberg]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

he's on the wrong side of history just like his lost presidency.

At least he has principles.

It's a bit disingenuous to say people who disagree with you have no principles.

It would be indeed. If that is what I said.

it sure seems heavily implied.

 

[jc456]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

why? i've not watched much else of this running joke.

so he pulled some nose hairs or thought of his own failures and pushed some tears out. this is supposed to make me go "awww" and give a damn about him?

he died to me the day he put his dog on top of the car for a family vacation.

he's probably crying cause he knows he gets 4 more years of this.

the blow back against romney is going to be so bad that it will be stark warning against rhinos and dems in states that Trump carried! they will think twice about going along with future despicable acts being planned by the communist party !

i agree about the response but how sad is that?! It’s a large leap backwards when we can’t be respectful of those who see things differently than ourselves. It’s a step to far to go after revenge and sling lazy emotional threats. We all need to grow up

REVENGE? You have to vote vengeful idiots like Romney, McCain, Schiff, Pelosi, Omar, Talib. Booker, Jeffries, Warren, and Nadler out of office. THEY are the real danger to THE REPUBLIC!

America was saved from Tyranny and Lawlessness today. Celebrate that! The Democrats were attacking every Constitution of ours in order to Tear Down America, and then Fundamentally Change it, to Structurally Change it in to a Socialist Nation.

Trump was not The REAL Target. He was nothing but the EXCUSE for The Assault on Our Democracy, and for The Siege on The White House and on our Republic.

Tree, last night on my way home from work, a caller called into a show from Utah, and his comment was something like this: it wasn't Romney's job to talk with his family about the choice he had to make, he was supposed to talk to the constituents to which he represented. The folks in Utah are fking pissed.

 

[jc456]

Move over Benedict Arnold. The punk from Utah is on a personal vendetta.

So....to vote for conviction when we ALL know he did it is equivalent to Arnold trying to sell the country out to the British during a war. #Becauseitsacult

you know absolutely nothing. you know what your puppeteers told you to say. But you know nothing. we have jurisprudence in our country, and that was not given in this hoax. And is why it is a hoax. HOAX!!! Screen writers be proud of the fiction created.

 

[jc456]

Romney is a RINO and always has been.
I thank God that Romney wasn't elected president.
If he had been, he more than likely would have moved the republican party to the left
to the point that Trump would not have been electable.

Again, unfortunately for your non-point, Senators aren't there to represent political parties. They're there to represent the citizens of their state. Therefore "RINO" is a completely specious term.

I am the President of Asia and your argument is invalid.

In this instance to my "non-point", Romney is NOT representing the Great state of Utah, but, he is representing
himself, Pogo. Romney does not like Trump....period. It's a personal matter, and has been. And, yes he is a RINO, I would
have more respect for him if he was a Democrat.

Again --- that's up to the voters of Utah, not those of Idaho and not those cheering on political football teams.

The fact remains --- Senators are there to represent their state, not a political party. It's always been that way. If we were supposed to be run by political parties, our Constitution would have been written that way. It wasn't.

"RINO" is not a valid argument. It's invalid because it hangs on the premise that a Senator (or Rep, etc) is there to represent a political party. That premise is provably false. If being a "Republican" or a "Democrat" or a "Whig" meant one was compelled to vote as the party dick-tated, that would be a sham and an oligarchy.

Of course the other thing you could be saying with the term "RINO" is that Republicans (in this case) are supposed to be sheep who vote as their party tells them and screw their constituents. That's not good either.

If you live in Utah and your Senator doesn't represent your views, you have a legitimate beef. If you don't --- you don't. Simple as that.

the people of Utah have a draft out for signatures of recall for ole Mitt. over 60% wanted him to acquit. That is who he works for. he's fired., what a legacy.

 

[jc456]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

he's on the wrong side of history just like his lost presidency.

At least he has principles.

no, that really isn't what that was. he works for the people of Utah, he isn't allowed to work off of principles, he does what his constituents want him to do. oops, a recall is under way!! he is done as a politician, his legacy will be as a Benedict Arnold from the people of Utah. His constituents are his employer. 60% wanted him to acquit. No, not principles, he did it for himself and not the country, and that again is not his job. personal gain isn't the statute here.

 

[jc456]

If you didn’t catch Romney’s senate speech about impeachment I suggest you take a few minutes and watch it. That was incredible. He’s a yes, on impeachment. I’ll post a video once one becomes available.

he's on the wrong side of history just like his lost presidency.

At least he has principles.

so a different though jumped into my head, so if he voted to acquit he wouldn't have principles?

 

[jc456]

Romney went against his party and rightfully so. Republicans are on the wrong side of history here.

Romney was representing Utah, it wasn't his job to vote differently then their wishes. he's toast as a politician. BTW, a good point was made on radio yesterday after the vote, he knew he would be the only one dissenting, the caller asked, what if his vote were the last vote to remove trump? Would he have made that vote?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Lol....by Friday, nobody is going to care about Mitt Romney.

Again, what we see from progressives today is what we always see.....spiking the football on symbolic stuff that is insignificant in the bigger picture.
Saw it with NFL kneel-in's....fail
Saw it with David Hogg....fail
Saw it on Kavanaugh folklore..fail.
Saw it on Mueller.....fail
Saw it on Comey....fail
Saw it on Manifort.....fail
Saw it on Flynn.....fail
Saw it on Cohen.....fail
Saw it on Clapper......fail
Saw it on Stone.....fail


Saw it on Sondlen....fail
Saw it on Bolton......fail
Saw it on Schiff.....fail
Saw it on whistleblower...fail

Etc.....etc.....etc....


Land O' Lakes Butter

No one cares about Mitt Romney NOW. That's why he's being such an ass: to get attention and pretend he's relevant to something.

 

[basquebromance]

What does Mitt Romney even stand for? we need an investigation