Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really, you think Mitt would have allowed our troops to be charged with local offenses according to Iraqi law? What makes you think he'd do that to our troops? Furthermore, it was President Bush who empowered the Iraqis to do so. Well according to your Time article.
See post #60 to see how wrong you are.
From your link on Post #60
The Bush Administration had agreed in 2004 to restore Iraqi sovereignty, and in 2005 put the country’s elected government in charge of shaping its destiny. But President Bush hadn’t anticipated that Iraqi democracy would see pro-U.S. parties sidelined and would, instead, consistently return governments closer to Tehran than they are to Washington.
There you have it. President Bush gave them the power.
See post #60 to see how wrong you are.
From your link on Post #60
The Bush Administration had agreed in 2004 to restore Iraqi sovereignty, and in 2005 put the country’s elected government in charge of shaping its destiny. But President Bush hadn’t anticipated that Iraqi democracy would see pro-U.S. parties sidelined and would, instead, consistently return governments closer to Tehran than they are to Washington.
There you have it. President Bush gave them the power.
In the words of the Brown Bomber: 'You can run, but you can't hide."
You claimed that Bush couldn't get an agreement to leave troops.
I showed that you were wrong....and, in fact, he provided three years for the community organizer to show his chops....troops could remain until 2012.
He couldn't.
So...you provide he above quote....which has nothing to do with the point.
That's pretty much you flying the white flag, huh?
Wrong.
The problem was totally due to the ineptitude of Obama, and folks like you who put him in office.
"In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that set the clock ticking on ending the war hed launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012,...."
Iraq?s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence | TIME.com
Do you understand that?
Bush left Obama with three years.....three years....to work out an agreement.
The dunce could not.
You post an opinion piece entitled 'Iraq's Government, not Obama, called time on the US troop presence',
and that's supposed to be your evidence that Obama, not the Iraqi Government, called time on US troop presence?
lol, are you some sort of dyslexic to boot?
So....Obama had the opportunity to convince the Iraqis.....but failed in said attempt.
Glad to see you dunces can no longer blame Bush.
Now...as for Obama's foreign policy achievements?
With apologies to Brendan Behan, watching Obama attempt to accomplish policy objectives is like watching a Eunuch in a Harem.
He wants to, but just cant.
poor deluded left-wing nutjobs; furiously defending the most inept administration in history; and the world goes up in flames, and the country tears itself apart
You post an opinion piece entitled 'Iraq's Government, not Obama, called time on the US troop presence',
and that's supposed to be your evidence that Obama, not the Iraqi Government, called time on US troop presence?
lol, are you some sort of dyslexic to boot?
So....Obama had the opportunity to convince the Iraqis.....but failed in said attempt.
Glad to see you dunces can no longer blame Bush.
Now...as for Obama's foreign policy achievements?
With apologies to Brendan Behan, watching Obama attempt to accomplish policy objectives is like watching a Eunuch in a Harem.
He wants to, but just cant.
Obama wasn't elected by the American people to carry out McCain and Romney's foolish ideas.
Tea is soooooooooooooooooooo much better for you than that Kool-Aid you're drinking leftard
you should try some
So....Obama had the opportunity to convince the Iraqis.....but failed in said attempt.
Glad to see you dunces can no longer blame Bush.
Now...as for Obama's foreign policy achievements?
With apologies to Brendan Behan, watching Obama attempt to accomplish policy objectives is like watching a Eunuch in a Harem.
He wants to, but just cant.
Obama wasn't elected by the American people to carry out McCain and Romney's foolish ideas.
What a truly stupid post.
The subject is Romney having predicted the outcome of an Obama election, everything he predicted has come to pass....
...and some moron, you, comes up with a "....well....so what..." post.
I tell you to get fire insurance, you decline, your house burns down...and you post the equivalent of 'I didn't have to listen to you!'
But this space is for intelligent discussion....how did you slither past security?
Tea is soooooooooooooooooooo much better for you than that Kool-Aid you're drinking leftard
you should try some
Answer the question. Which drove his approval rating to 28%? The economy or the wars?
You won't answer that question because you can't. You know the answer. It's both.
Do you need help brushing your teeth and cutting your meat with a knife, too?
From your link on Post #60
The Bush Administration had agreed in 2004 to restore Iraqi sovereignty, and in 2005 put the countrys elected government in charge of shaping its destiny. But President Bush hadnt anticipated that Iraqi democracy would see pro-U.S. parties sidelined and would, instead, consistently return governments closer to Tehran than they are to Washington.
There you have it. President Bush gave them the power.
In the words of the Brown Bomber: 'You can run, but you can't hide."
You claimed that Bush couldn't get an agreement to leave troops.
I showed that you were wrong....and, in fact, he provided three years for the community organizer to show his chops....troops could remain until 2012.
He couldn't.
So...you provide he above quote....which has nothing to do with the point.
That's pretty much you flying the white flag, huh?
WTF is wrong with you? Obama ran his 2008 campaign on the platform of getting out of Iraq because he could show, unlike Hillary, that he was against the invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation from the very beginning.
Sorry you can't remember that but it was a BFD with Americans who could connect the dots and knew we were wrong to be there in the first place.
Get out the weeds.
"""End of war in Iraq is major promise kept for Obama"""
Friday Oct 21, 2011
"""President Barack Obama's announcement Friday that all U.S. troops would leave Iraq by the end of 2011 marks the fulfillment of a major political promise Obama had made on the 2008 campaign trail."""
End of war in Iraq is major promise kept for Obama - First Read
You post an opinion piece entitled 'Iraq's Government, not Obama, called time on the US troop presence',
and that's supposed to be your evidence that Obama, not the Iraqi Government, called time on US troop presence?
lol, are you some sort of dyslexic to boot?
So....Obama had the opportunity to convince the Iraqis.....but failed in said attempt.
Glad to see you dunces can no longer blame Bush.
Now...as for Obama's foreign policy achievements?
With apologies to Brendan Behan, watching Obama attempt to accomplish policy objectives is like watching a Eunuch in a Harem.
He wants to, but just cant.
Obama wasn't elected by the American people to carry out McCain and Romney's foolish ideas.
Hitler was popular too; and Saddam; and Castro
what is your point leftard?
See post #60 to see how wrong you are.
That, again, would be the article entitled:
Iraqs Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence
The "Time" was 2012.....
...who was the President?
Obama wasn't elected by the American people to carry out McCain and Romney's foolish ideas.
What a truly stupid post.
The subject is Romney having predicted the outcome of an Obama election, everything he predicted has come to pass....
...and some moron, you, comes up with a "....well....so what..." post.
I tell you to get fire insurance, you decline, your house burns down...and you post the equivalent of 'I didn't have to listen to you!'
But this space is for intelligent discussion....how did you slither past security?
Romney didn't predict anything. Any military officer who ever got his stars will tell you that in War College (that's right, each branch of the military has one) they are taught that an occupying force cannot impose democracy on a sheikdom.
Hitler was popular too; and Saddam; and Castro
what is your point leftard?
In the words of the Brown Bomber: 'You can run, but you can't hide."
You claimed that Bush couldn't get an agreement to leave troops.
I showed that you were wrong....and, in fact, he provided three years for the community organizer to show his chops....troops could remain until 2012.
He couldn't.
So...you provide he above quote....which has nothing to do with the point.
That's pretty much you flying the white flag, huh?
WTF is wrong with you? Obama ran his 2008 campaign on the platform of getting out of Iraq because he could show, unlike Hillary, that he was against the invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation from the very beginning.
Sorry you can't remember that but it was a BFD with Americans who could connect the dots and knew we were wrong to be there in the first place.
Get out the weeds.
"""End of war in Iraq is major promise kept for Obama"""
Friday Oct 21, 2011
"""President Barack Obama's announcement Friday that all U.S. troops would leave Iraq by the end of 2011 marks the fulfillment of a major political promise Obama had made on the 2008 campaign trail."""
End of war in Iraq is major promise kept for Obama - First Read
I see the plan.....bolder and larger font makes a stupid response correct.
Government school grad, huh?
Now, focus like a laser: was Romney correct?
Is the current chaos, and commensurate loss of all our earlier gains in Iraq, the direct result of Obama ineptitude.
And....are you one of the fools who put this wind bag in office, and, therefore, also responsible for the debacle?
Honesty would be both novel and a plus.
Hitler was popular too; and Saddam; and Castro
what is your point leftard?
I think 28% shows a distinct unpopularity, you idiot.
I knew you couldn't answer that question. It's fucking obvious, like you.
Hitler was popular too; and Saddam; and Castro
what is your point leftard?
Have you educated yourself yet? You still think there is no threat from the canadian border, or are you just ignoring the truth to save face.
