Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Your Lord and Savior has outspent every other country in human history
You're going to pull that in a thread in which the OP muses "one presumes, at least, that [Reagan] was not a prophet in the true sense, and delivering directives straight from the Almighty, although I could be wrong about that"?
Your Lord and Savior has outspent every other country in human history
You're going to pull that in a thread in which the OP muses "one presumes, at least, that [Reagan] was not a prophet in the true sense, and delivering directives straight from the Almighty, although I could be wrong about that"?
Bet you $10 you have an Obama Halo pic in your wallet where normal people keeps pictures of their kids
) that you have a Raygun desktop b/g.
You're going to pull that in a thread in which the OP muses "one presumes, at least, that [Reagan] was not a prophet in the true sense, and delivering directives straight from the Almighty, although I could be wrong about that"?
Bet you $10 you have an Obama Halo pic in your wallet where normal people keeps pictures of their kids
I bet you $10,000 (Romney-style
The biggest difference I see in Reagan, compared to somebody like Obama is, right wingers have created a MYTH, and they worship a MYTH. There is NO real looking at the reality of Reagan by right wingers, it would destroy their MYTH.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
One Obama Deficit > Any Reagan Budget
One Obama Deficit > All Reagans Deficits
Gee Frank...you know, back in 1971 my Dodge 3/4 ton pickup with a 318 cu. in. V-8 used to cost me < $8 to fill up. Now, my car with a 4 cylinder costs me almost $80 to fill up. So I outta go out and find me one of them there 1971 pickup...I could save $72 dollars!!!
Reagan consistently comes out in the top five in public polling, and even in rankings by historians averages about 10th. In either case, Reagan's legacy is secure - left-wing whining not-with-standing.
Even from NBC, the socialist news organization:
List of presidential rankings - politics - White House | NBC News
President: 2009 rank, 2000 rank (Historians)
Abraham Lincoln: 1, 1
George Washington: 2, 3
Franklin D. Roosevelt: 3, 2
Theodore Roosevelt: 4, 4
Harry S. Truman: 5, 5
John F. Kennedy: 6, 8
Thomas Jefferson: 7, 7
Dwight D. Eisenhower: 8, 9
Woodrow Wilson: 9, 6
Ronald Reagan: 10, 11
Suck it up!
Those who are interested, there is a 2004 book, titled "Presidential Leadership" compiled and edited by various scholars, historians, professors and pundits, of all political affiliation.
(ISBN 0-7432-5433-3).
In this book, the Appendix shows several tables of ratings of presidents.
I am sure it is available at various outlets or in your local library. Buy it or borrow it and enjoy!
Polls of the public are usually suspect, the average citizen usually know some of the presidents like Lincoln and Ike but how many can rate Van Buren, or John Tyler? One of the interesting bits is why historians rate as they do. What characteristics do they look for? It brings up still other questions, do the times create the best or worst presidents? Would Lincoln just be a so so president if not for the Civil War? There are a number of books on presidential qualities or lack thereof, and it might explain how we the people pick some awful duds. Think of it when America had five million people we had Washington and Jefferson, with 300 million we had....
The biggest difference I see in Reagan, compared to somebody like Obama is, Reagan understood that Washington didn't solve problems, it created more problems. Obama and his types aren't happy without the biggest Washington possible.
The biggest difference I see in Reagan, compared to somebody like Obama is, right wingers have created a MYTH, and they worship a MYTH. There is NO real looking at the reality of Reagan by right wingers, it would destroy their MYTH.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
Your Lord and Savior has outspent every other country in human history
You're going to pull that in a thread in which the OP muses "one presumes, at least, that [Reagan] was not a prophet in the true sense, and delivering directives straight from the Almighty, although I could be wrong about that"?
Bet you $10 you have an Obama Halo pic in your wallet where normal people keeps pictures of their kids
Your chart only shows dates for the Reagan administration, not for the Obama administration. I suspect the reason for that is that your playing fast a loose with the fact and leaving out all the quarters when Obama's spending grew the fastest. Check that. I don't SUSPECT it. I know it.
Talk about MYTHS. Everything liberals say about Obama is big fucking lie. The myth making has already started and he's still in office.
The biggest difference I see in Reagan, compared to somebody like Obama is, Reagan understood that Washington didn't solve problems, it created more problems. Obama and his types aren't happy without the biggest Washington possible.
The biggest difference I see in Reagan, compared to somebody like Obama is, right wingers have created a MYTH, and they worship a MYTH. There is NO real looking at the reality of Reagan by right wingers, it would destroy their MYTH.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
Your chart only shows dates for the Reagan administration, not for the Obama administration. I suspect the reason for that is that your playing fast a loose with the fact and leaving out all the quarters when Obama's spending grew the fastest. Check that. I don't SUSPECT it. I know it.
Talk about MYTHS. Everything liberals say about Obama is big fucking lie. The myth making has already started and he's still in office.
Have an adult read the chart for you... the 'Start of First Term' is Q1 81/09
Your chart only shows dates for the Reagan administration, not for the Obama administration. I suspect the reason for that is that your playing fast a loose with the fact and leaving out all the quarters when Obama's spending grew the fastest. Check that. I don't SUSPECT it. I know it.
Talk about MYTHS. Everything liberals say about Obama is big fucking lie. The myth making has already started and he's still in office.
Have an adult read the chart for you... the 'Start of First Term' is Q1 81/09
Then your chart is horseshit. Spending has gone up way more than that under Obama. The authors of this manure obviously aren't counting all of Obama's spending.
Have an adult read the chart for you... the 'Start of First Term' is Q1 81/09
Then your chart is horseshit. Spending has gone up way more than that under Obama. The authors of this manure obviously aren't counting all of Obama's spending.
So, if that's actually how it is, make the case for it.
Then your chart is horseshit. Spending has gone up way more than that under Obama. The authors of this manure obviously aren't counting all of Obama's spending.
So, if that's actually how it is, make the case for it.
Oh, for the love of God. Nothing like a person with their hands over their eyes, yelling, "Show me!"
President Obama: The Biggest Government Spender In World History - Forbes
Your chart only shows dates for the Reagan administration, not for the Obama administration. I suspect the reason for that is that your playing fast a loose with the fact and leaving out all the quarters when Obama's spending grew the fastest. Check that. I don't SUSPECT it. I know it.
Talk about MYTHS. Everything liberals say about Obama is big fucking lie. The myth making has already started and he's still in office.
Have an adult read the chart for you... the 'Start of First Term' is Q1 81/09
Then your chart is horseshit. Spending has gone up way more than that under Obama. The authors of this manure obviously aren't counting all of Obama's spending.
We went from a creditor nation under Reagan to a debtor one.
Have an adult read the chart for you... the 'Start of First Term' is Q1 81/09
Then your chart is horseshit. Spending has gone up way more than that under Obama. The authors of this manure obviously aren't counting all of Obama's spending.
So, if that's actually how it is, make the case for it.
More bad news for right wing parrots...
Growing government? Bush grew government employment through his entire term. Under Obama government employment has DECREASED...
Then your chart is horseshit. Spending has gone up way more than that under Obama. The authors of this manure obviously aren't counting all of Obama's spending.
So, if that's actually how it is, make the case for it.
It's already been done in multiple threads. The claim that Obama's spending is the lowest in several administrations got laughed out of the forum, but here this turd is trying to pedal the same manure in different form.
Your chart only shows dates for the Reagan administration, not for the Obama administration. I suspect the reason for that is that your playing fast a loose with the fact and leaving out all the quarters when Obama's spending grew the fastest. Check that. I don't SUSPECT it. I know it.
Talk about MYTHS. Everything liberals say about Obama is big fucking lie. The myth making has already started and he's still in office.
The biggest difference I see in Reagan, compared to somebody like Obama is, right wingers have created a MYTH, and they worship a MYTH. There is NO real looking at the reality of Reagan by right wingers, it would destroy their MYTH.
"The debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."
David Stockman - Director of the Office of Management and Budget for U.S. President Ronald Reagan.
Have an adult read the chart for you... the 'Start of First Term' is Q1 81/09
