Rudy to Begin Revealing Top Level Democrats Making Millions of Dollars Selling Their Public Office

[ChrisL]

Is Rudy going to explain how his no talent son got a $90,000 job in the Trump administration?

The Atlantic Politics Daily: The Other Giuliani Who Works for Trump

What does he do, exactly? He’s the 31-year-old son of Rudy, the former New York City mayor turned Trump’s garrulous personal attorney. A former professional golfer, Andrew helps arrange sports teams’ visits to the White House, and often joins the president on some rounds of golf.

Beyond that, well, it’s not quite clear what he else he works on, as my colleague Elaina Plott reports:

“‘He doesn’t really try to be involved in anything,’ one former senior White House official told me, speaking on the condition of anonymity in order to be candid. ‘He’s just having a nice time.’”

You just said what he does. "Andrew helps arrange sports teams visits to the White House, and often joins the president on some rounds of golf."

He probably gives Trump pointers and helps with his game, considering he is a former professional golfer. Presidents need their relaxation too, especially when they are constantly badgered by rotten leftists.

Personal favor to Rudy using public funds

From what I have seen, not many sports teams want to meet with Trump

Major pro and college teams that have visited Trump White House

 

[rightwinger]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

 

[ChrisL]

Former Vice President Joe Biden, now a 2020 Democratic presidential contender, has locked into a specific story about the controversy in Ukraine.

He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden's son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.

There’s just one problem.

Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.

And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

For instance, Burisma’s American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country’s chief prosecutor and offered “an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures” about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government’s official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced.

In addition, Burisma’s American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team’s internal emails.

The memos raise troubling questions:

1.) If the Ukraine prosecutor’s firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as “false information?"

2.) If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma’s American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?

Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) since the summer of 2018, fearing it might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws. First, they hired a former federal prosecutor to bring the information to the U.S. attorney in New York, who, they say, showed no interest. Then, the Ukrainians reached out to President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma.

Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.

After I first reported it in a column, the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting.


More at link below.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

John Soloman

Pleaseeeee!

He's part of the Giuliani and Goon gang.....

Part of the whole scam From the beginning, Parnus fed Solomon most of Solomon's fake and false propaganda.

He's even been mentioned in the impeachment trial.

in otherwords you cant refute the message so you attack the messenger,,,

Like so many leftists here. They are frustrated.

 

[ChrisL]

I already did. It isn't "dirt" if it's true. If Rudy turns up actual corruption from Joe and family, then it's fact and not dirt at all.

Well, it is dirt even if it is true. But that is missing the point. You said Trump did not get anything...if Rudy is telling the truth then that is not true, Trump did indeed get something.

Also, if there were actual corruption from Joe and family then it should be a legal matter and the information should be handed over to Barr. But that is not happening, because it is not a legal matter it is a 100% political matter.

True dirt. Lol.

"But that is not happening, because it is not a legal matter it is a 100% political matter"

Just like the impeachment in the house.

 

[ChrisL]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

Don't cry rightwinger, PLEASE.

 

[Care4all]

How do you like seeing Schiff being proven to be a dishonest lying Schmuck on National TV for the next three days, just like you are?

Please, tell us what you think he lied about, be specific...thanks in advance... I'd like to argue it, debate it... so pick a topic of the lies that you claim schiff made and let's go at it!

WaPo gives Schiff three Pinocchois on whistleblower anonymity claim

thanks, knew about that, but thought original tree was talking about during the three days of trial?

 

[Care4all]

Former Vice President Joe Biden, now a 2020 Democratic presidential contender, has locked into a specific story about the controversy in Ukraine.

He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden's son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.

There’s just one problem.

Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.

And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

For instance, Burisma’s American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country’s chief prosecutor and offered “an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures” about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government’s official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced.

In addition, Burisma’s American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team’s internal emails.

The memos raise troubling questions:

1.) If the Ukraine prosecutor’s firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as “false information?"

2.) If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma’s American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?

Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) since the summer of 2018, fearing it might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws. First, they hired a former federal prosecutor to bring the information to the U.S. attorney in New York, who, they say, showed no interest. Then, the Ukrainians reached out to President Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma.

Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.

After I first reported it in a column, the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting.


More at link below.

Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

John Soloman

Pleaseeeee!

He's part of the Giuliani and Goon gang.....

Part of the whole scam From the beginning, Parnus fed Solomon most of Solomon's fake and false propaganda.

He's even been mentioned in the impeachment trial.

in otherwords you cant refute the message so you attack the messenger,,,

With good reason...
I've rejected Solomon because he's a paid writer, doing a gig for Giuliani, Parnas, Digenovas, Fruman, Firtash..... while pretending like he's some super sleuth investigative reporter for the past year or two....not disclosing who he worked for...

A perfect SET UP, for the slanderers creating dirt..... a means to legitimize it and get it to the ears they want, to hear it.

 

[Care4all]

We have the transcript. We know what was said. There was nothing wrong with what Trump said yet alone an impeccable offense. The spy is a deep stater. If speculation is correct who he is, he was in a meeting with Ukraine officials at the White House during DumBama, discussing how they could stop Trump.

He was working for more than the government, he was working for the Democrat party.

Do we have the entire transcript? Or do we have the notes taken about the call?

We have what the stenographers typed. It's the same way all calls were recorded since Nixon.

Nope, we do not. That's locked up in a top secret server.....

And others that heard the call, who tried to correct the notes, were rejected.

 

[Care4all]

Why do right wingers even think that Giuliani, Trump`s campaign lawyer and fixer is over there for corruption against the USA and all, and not there for Donald Trump as his personal lawyer/ operative gathering opposition research for candidate trump, , is beyond me??

 

[Care4all]

How do you like seeing Schiff being proven to be a dishonest lying Schmuck on National TV for the next three days, just like you are?

Lol, so The DOJ is not supposed to investigate public corruption?

Go back and hand in your resignation to Putin.

NOPE!

not at all what I said....

Trump isn't following the law, WHICH would be by going through the DOJ to investigate Joe Biden...

He's using his personal campaign lawyer and operative, Giuliani, with our State department cronies and so called diplomats he chose, AND A FOREIGN GOVT, to smear his opponent, and NOT DOING IT THROUGH the LEGAL process, the DOJ.


HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW THIS.....???

The DOJ was NOT involved with the UKRAINE and Burisma/Bidens and Crowdstrike debunked conspiracy....

It was campaign lawyer Giuliani trying to get the Ukraine govt to ANNOUNCE an investigation in to BURISMA/Bidens, in order to get the WH DC meeting etc, NOT actually doing an investigation.... according to Amb Sondland..... the public announcement is all that was needed for their this for that.

Please, tell us what you think he lied about, be specific...thanks in advance... I'd like to argue it, debate it... so pick a topic of the lies that you claim schiff made and let's go at it!

Schiff Busted Lying To Senate About Ukraine ‘Concern’ After Fact Check

Fact Check: Adam Schiff Falsely Claims Trump Conditioned Meeting, and Aid, on Investigations – USSA News | The Tea Party's Front Page

Schiff Caught Twisting Impeachment Evidence; Media Fact-Check Trump Attorneys, Instead

All speculative........might have, could have, perhaps....

 

[rightwinger]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

Don't cry rightwinger, PLEASE.

Just wondering how the Trump Justice Department works

Like our State Department, they have been superseded by a conspiracy theorist fighting dementia

 

[colfax_m]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

Don't cry rightwinger, PLEASE.

It’s a reasonable question. Why can’t anyone answer it coherently?

 

[Care4all]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

Don't cry rightwinger, PLEASE.

It’s a reasonable question. Why can’t anyone answer it coherently?

Because they ALL KNOW that Trump and Giuliani did this for PERSONAL reason and gain.

They are not stupid, they just like to play stupid, for their Messiah, Cheater Don.

 

[colfax_m]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

Don't cry rightwinger, PLEASE.

It’s a reasonable question. Why can’t anyone answer it coherently?

Because they ALL KNOW that Trump and Giuliani did this for PERSONAL reason and gain.

They are not stupid, they just like to play stupid, for their Messiah, Cheater Don.

The only semi-coherent answer that has been given is that “Trump doesn’t trust the DoJ” or that the DoJ is secretly already working on this despite their statements otherwise.

This ignores that Trump has appointed nearly every federal prosecutor. This ignores that Trump has his prosecutors working on his political errands already.

One silly poster even tried to convince me that Trump was just too busy to get the DoJ to work on it and was totally planning to do so sometime in the future.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Trump says Giuliani will give Ukraine info to Justice Dept., Congress

That was seven weeks ago. It's as if none of the Trumpers have ever seen the show. Trump has spent his life showing them he's a liar and a conman, and that's the only thing they refuse to believe.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

True dirt. Lol.

"But that is not happening, because it is not a legal matter it is a 100% political matter"

Just like the impeachment in the house.

Yes, dirt can be true information.

What does "Have dirt on someone" mean?

Yes, impeachment is a 100% political process.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Sunday morning now...the dirt was supposed to be delivered by Rudy on Friday.

Anyone have a link to what he dropped over night?

 

[ChrisL]

Is it a law that the president cannot call foreign leaders and ask them questions? Post that law, please.

 

[ChrisL]

If Democratic politicians are acting illegally, why does Trump need Rudy?

Doesn’t he have a Justice Department?

Don't cry rightwinger, PLEASE.

It’s a reasonable question. Why can’t anyone answer it coherently?

Because they ALL KNOW that Trump and Giuliani did this for PERSONAL reason and gain.

They are not stupid, they just like to play stupid, for their Messiah, Cheater Don.

The only semi-coherent answer that has been given is that “Trump doesn’t trust the DoJ” or that the DoJ is secretly already working on this despite their statements otherwise.

This ignores that Trump has appointed nearly every federal prosecutor. This ignores that Trump has his prosecutors working on his political errands already.

One silly poster even tried to convince me that Trump was just too busy to get the DoJ to work on it and was totally planning to do so sometime in the future.

Is there a law that says he has to do that?

Face the facts, the president didn't do anything wrong. He simply asked a question. Democrats jumped on the "gotcha now" train over a phone call, where there was no evidence of any wrongdoing on the president's part.

 

[ChrisL]

Sunday morning now...the dirt was supposed to be delivered by Rudy on Friday.

Anyone have a link to what he dropped over night?

This is not any different than any of the crap the democrats try to pull. You people are seriously butthurt. Never seen so much butthurt in my life.