Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he does something "bad" then I will say so. So far, he has been doing quite well, and I have no complaints, which doesn't mean that I "worship" anyone, fool.
He’s using government to go after his political enemies. If a dem president were doing this a Republican, I would say it’s bad. Why wouldn’t you?
Go after a political opponent that is up to some shady activities. I don't have a problem with that.
Like when the FBI investigated Trump’s shady campaign?
Go after a political opponent that is up to some shady activities. I don't have a problem with that.
Like when the FBI investigates Trump’s shady campaign?
That has been done. What did they find?
A lot of people lying about who they talked to and why.
Republicans have been trying to tell us that it was a huge scandal. I guess you disagree with them then.
After such a thorough anal probing, if Trump had actually done something, they would have found it.
Maybe. I’m sure you feel the same way about the Clintons but let’s not get distracted.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?Correct, it is stupid. There are no laws against Rudy looking into the Burisma matter. There is nothing wrong with a lawyer seeking evidence to protect his client.
Never said it was illegal, but you fucking said there was no benefit to Trump's lawyer finding evidence of his innocence, which is something so stupid I was shocked even you could post it...but then I remembered that worship comes before all else.
You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
I have no problem with what Rudy is doing, this is not about Rudy. This is about the president of our country asking the leader of another country to help his personal attorney for his own personal gain.
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
He’s using government to go after his political enemies. If a dem president were doing this a Republican, I would say it’s bad. Why wouldn’t you?
Go after a political opponent that is up to some shady activities. I don't have a problem with that.
Like when the FBI investigated Trump’s shady campaign?
Like when the FBI investigates Trump’s shady campaign?
That has been done. What did they find?
A lot of people lying about who they talked to and why.
Republicans have been trying to tell us that it was a huge scandal. I guess you disagree with them then.
After such a thorough anal probing, if Trump had actually done something, they would have found it.
Maybe. I’m sure you feel the same way about the Clintons but let’s not get distracted.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
The Clintons are establishment politicians who have been in politics a VERY long time and have a LOT of powerful friends. Any dolt should know that. Whereas, Trump is a newcomer to the world of dirty politics and has pretty much NO friends. Republicans and democrats hate his guts, and that tells me all I need to know.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?Correct, it is stupid. There are no laws against Rudy looking into the Burisma matter. There is nothing wrong with a lawyer seeking evidence to protect his client.
Never said it was illegal, but you fucking said there was no benefit to Trump's lawyer finding evidence of his innocence, which is something so stupid I was shocked even you could post it...but then I remembered that worship comes before all else.
You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
I have no problem with what Rudy is doing, this is not about Rudy. This is about the president of our country asking the leader of another country to help his personal attorney for his own personal gain.
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
Go after a political opponent that is up to some shady activities. I don't have a problem with that.
Like when the FBI investigated Trump’s shady campaign?
That has been done. What did they find?
A lot of people lying about who they talked to and why.
Republicans have been trying to tell us that it was a huge scandal. I guess you disagree with them then.
After such a thorough anal probing, if Trump had actually done something, they would have found it.
Maybe. I’m sure you feel the same way about the Clintons but let’s not get distracted.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
The Clintons are establishment politicians who have been in politics a VERY long time and have a LOT of powerful friends. Any dolt should know that. Whereas, Trump is a newcomer to the world of dirty politics and has pretty much NO friends. Republicans and democrats hate his guts, and that tells me all I need to know.
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Just look at Pam Bondi. AG of Florida. Chipped in $25k to her re-election and boom, she decides not to prosecute him for the fraudulent Trump university.
The Clinton have a lot of enemies too. Every one of them came up short.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
It’s irrelevant anyway. I can’t imagine someone claiming they didn’t have a personal motive because they said “we” and not “I”. It’s ridiculous on its face. As if maybe someone isn’t being super truthful never crossed their minds.Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?Never said it was illegal, but you fucking said there was no benefit to Trump's lawyer finding evidence of his innocence, which is something so stupid I was shocked even you could post it...but then I remembered that worship comes before all else.
You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
I have no problem with what Rudy is doing, this is not about Rudy. This is about the president of our country asking the leader of another country to help his personal attorney for his own personal gain.
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
Or the royal "we".
Like when the FBI investigated Trump’s shady campaign?
A lot of people lying about who they talked to and why.
Republicans have been trying to tell us that it was a huge scandal. I guess you disagree with them then.
After such a thorough anal probing, if Trump had actually done something, they would have found it.
Maybe. I’m sure you feel the same way about the Clintons but let’s not get distracted.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
The Clintons are establishment politicians who have been in politics a VERY long time and have a LOT of powerful friends. Any dolt should know that. Whereas, Trump is a newcomer to the world of dirty politics and has pretty much NO friends. Republicans and democrats hate his guts, and that tells me all I need to know.
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Just look at Pam Bondi. AG of Florida. Chipped in $25k to her re-election and boom, she decides not to prosecute him for the fraudulent Trump university.
The Clinton have a lot of enemies too. Every one of them came up short.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Chumming with because of donations and being a part of the establishment are two entirely different things, and this is pretty much obvious with the way they treat him. He is not a part of their "club."
After such a thorough anal probing, if Trump had actually done something, they would have found it.
Maybe. I’m sure you feel the same way about the Clintons but let’s not get distracted.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
The Clintons are establishment politicians who have been in politics a VERY long time and have a LOT of powerful friends. Any dolt should know that. Whereas, Trump is a newcomer to the world of dirty politics and has pretty much NO friends. Republicans and democrats hate his guts, and that tells me all I need to know.
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Just look at Pam Bondi. AG of Florida. Chipped in $25k to her re-election and boom, she decides not to prosecute him for the fraudulent Trump university.
The Clinton have a lot of enemies too. Every one of them came up short.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Chumming with because of donations and being a part of the establishment are two entirely different things, and this is pretty much obvious with the way they treat him. He is not a part of their "club."
Trump bought access as a billionaire. He sells access as a politician. Same story. He’s the leader of the club now.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?Correct, it is stupid. There are no laws against Rudy looking into the Burisma matter. There is nothing wrong with a lawyer seeking evidence to protect his client.
Never said it was illegal, but you fucking said there was no benefit to Trump's lawyer finding evidence of his innocence, which is something so stupid I was shocked even you could post it...but then I remembered that worship comes before all else.
You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
I have no problem with what Rudy is doing, this is not about Rudy. This is about the president of our country asking the leader of another country to help his personal attorney for his own personal gain.
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
Maybe. I’m sure you feel the same way about the Clintons but let’s not get distracted.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
The Clintons are establishment politicians who have been in politics a VERY long time and have a LOT of powerful friends. Any dolt should know that. Whereas, Trump is a newcomer to the world of dirty politics and has pretty much NO friends. Republicans and democrats hate his guts, and that tells me all I need to know.
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Just look at Pam Bondi. AG of Florida. Chipped in $25k to her re-election and boom, she decides not to prosecute him for the fraudulent Trump university.
The Clinton have a lot of enemies too. Every one of them came up short.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Chumming with because of donations and being a part of the establishment are two entirely different things, and this is pretty much obvious with the way they treat him. He is not a part of their "club."
Trump bought access as a billionaire. He sells access as a politician. Same story. He’s the leader of the club now.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
You've got nothing. Time to move on and stop whining.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?Never said it was illegal, but you fucking said there was no benefit to Trump's lawyer finding evidence of his innocence, which is something so stupid I was shocked even you could post it...but then I remembered that worship comes before all else.
You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
I have no problem with what Rudy is doing, this is not about Rudy. This is about the president of our country asking the leader of another country to help his personal attorney for his own personal gain.
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
It doesn't mean him personally.
The Clintons are establishment politicians who have been in politics a VERY long time and have a LOT of powerful friends. Any dolt should know that. Whereas, Trump is a newcomer to the world of dirty politics and has pretty much NO friends. Republicans and democrats hate his guts, and that tells me all I need to know.
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Just look at Pam Bondi. AG of Florida. Chipped in $25k to her re-election and boom, she decides not to prosecute him for the fraudulent Trump university.
The Clinton have a lot of enemies too. Every one of them came up short.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Chumming with because of donations and being a part of the establishment are two entirely different things, and this is pretty much obvious with the way they treat him. He is not a part of their "club."
Trump bought access as a billionaire. He sells access as a politician. Same story. He’s the leader of the club now.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
You've got nothing. Time to move on and stop whining.
Don't worry. You're lowering the bar. That's going to come back and bite you.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
It doesn't mean him personally.
Sure. Because people engaging in corruption always make sure to indicate that with the proper pronouns.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?You're moving the goal posts Gator. Here is what started this
Gain and benefit are two different things. Benefit means help. Gain means an advantage. There is no advantage for Trump no matter what. Yes, it benefits Trump if Rudy finds evidence of potential corruption by the Biden's.
It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
It doesn't mean him personally.
Sure. Because people engaging in corruption always make sure to indicate that with the proper pronouns.
Trump is no newcomer. He was bragging about chumming around with politicians his whole career and claimed he knew exactly how to get what he wanted.
Just look at Pam Bondi. AG of Florida. Chipped in $25k to her re-election and boom, she decides not to prosecute him for the fraudulent Trump university.
The Clinton have a lot of enemies too. Every one of them came up short.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
Chumming with because of donations and being a part of the establishment are two entirely different things, and this is pretty much obvious with the way they treat him. He is not a part of their "club."
Trump bought access as a billionaire. He sells access as a politician. Same story. He’s the leader of the club now.
Republicans and Barr are claiming the very existence of the investigation was an atrocity (I’m taking a little poetic license here). Disagree?
You've got nothing. Time to move on and stop whining.
Don't worry. You're lowering the bar. That's going to come back and bite you.
Again, you've got nothing on him. You tried, you failed, time to give up this circus.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
It doesn't mean him personally.
Sure. Because people engaging in corruption always make sure to indicate that with the proper pronouns.
What corruption do you speak of? Trump knew over a dozen people listen to his conversations with other leaders since he took office. He released the transcript with the full confidence he did nothing wrong, and he didn't.
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?It benefits ALL of us to have corruption in government rooted out.
What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
It doesn't mean him personally.
Sure. Because people engaging in corruption always make sure to indicate that with the proper pronouns.
What do you think about Biden's corruption? Oh, let me guess, you think he is pure as a driven snow. Nothing to see here in Ukraine, folks, but TRUMP!
Maybe “us” and “we” refer to Republicans?What they fail to remember about the phone call was that Trump used the words "us" and "we." He never said "me" or "mine."
This is about the President checking out potential corruption of the last administration, and there was plenty of that as we know.
this is hardly exculpatory.
It doesn't mean him personally.
Sure. Because people engaging in corruption always make sure to indicate that with the proper pronouns.
What corruption do you speak of? Trump knew over a dozen people listen to his conversations with other leaders since he took office. He released the transcript with the full confidence he did nothing wrong, and he didn't.
They tried desperately to keep a lid on this, and it got loose anyway. Seriously. The conversation was put in a top secret computer. Multiple people went to the lawyers at the CIA and NSC where it was suppressed. He then decided to block every request for information and every person's attempt to testify.
That's not how an innocent person acts.
