martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,046
- 34,363
- 2,300
A baker has no stake in a wedding, no role, no anything. Form of expression? What, now bakers are expressing support for weddings? When they sell other cakes what are they expressing and being part of? It;s a silly argument.
Bakers sell other cakes to gays. Do they know what gays do with cakes? Some gays MIGHT be using the cakes during sex. If a gay couple uses a cake during a sexual act, has the Christian offended his god because he participated in a sexual act?
Who cares? The real point is the government shouldn't be forcing people to decide between their morals and their economic well being over a freaking wedding cake, a non-vital, easily replaceable service.
Morals? What morals? Selling a cake involves morals? What about guns? What about wedding rings? What about anything people sell?
your arguments (supposed procedural arguments ) are at best, specious
And your desire to punish people who disagree with you should be criminal. Its not up to you or government to decide what arguments are specious when it comes to a person's moral code, unless there is an overwhelming reason for government to do so, and even then they must used the least intrusive measure to do it.
Not just jump right to "bake the cake or close shop"