Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.The CIA has shown that to be a lie and nothing but propaganda. No civilian targets were hit. Unless you think children would live in buildings that housed chemical weapon dispersion units and mechanics tools..I suppose it's to your credit that you're so defensive about it...it at least means that you'll be upset to know the truth.There were no children blown apart. The attacks were on a military target. Why don't you take your hate America attitude and get out.
Syria has claimed that children were among a number of civilians killed in a U.S. missile strike
But then again your a fool who likes to believe the shit your fed.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?
You're STILL Stupid !Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?
Calls me stupid but you can't spell HATING.....ROFL...
Derp Derp....Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?You're STILL Stupid !Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?
Calls me stupid but you can't spell HATING.....ROFL...
As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.The CIA has shown that to be a lie and nothing but propaganda. No civilian targets were hit. Unless you think children would live in buildings that housed chemical weapon dispersion units and mechanics tools..I suppose it's to your credit that you're so defensive about it...it at least means that you'll be upset to know the truth.
Syria has claimed that children were among a number of civilians killed in a U.S. missile strike
But then again your a fool who likes to believe the shit your fed.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Derp Derp....Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?You're STILL Stupid !Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?
Calls me stupid but you can't spell HATING.....ROFL...
Shut up ya skanky bitch.Derp Derp....Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?You're STILL Stupid !Another Jew Hateing Idiot strikes again.Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again | Zero Hedge
AWESOME! Come on President Hypocrite start ww3 to please your Jew pals!
Aren't you even ashamed to show your stupidity?
Calls me stupid but you can't spell HATING.....ROFL...
rightwingnut loon.
You're trying hard I guess but you're not that good.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.The CIA has shown that to be a lie and nothing but propaganda. No civilian targets were hit. Unless you think children would live in buildings that housed chemical weapon dispersion units and mechanics tools..I suppose it's to your credit that you're so defensive about it...it at least means that you'll be upset to know the truth.
Syria has claimed that children were among a number of civilians killed in a U.S. missile strike
But then again your a fool who likes to believe the shit your fed.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
So he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.The CIA has shown that to be a lie and nothing but propaganda. No civilian targets were hit. Unless you think children would live in buildings that housed chemical weapon dispersion units and mechanics tools..
But then again your a fool who likes to believe the shit your fed.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
Now you're just flinging shit to avoid my point. Obama was playing politics, as always.You're trying hard I guess but you're not that good.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.The CIA has shown that to be a lie and nothing but propaganda. No civilian targets were hit. Unless you think children would live in buildings that housed chemical weapon dispersion units and mechanics tools..
But then again your a fool who likes to believe the shit your fed.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
Try reading the text of the proposed Obama AUMF yourself if you like.
Feel free to point out the objectionable parts.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/aumf_02112015.pdf
In any case, Obama felt it was necessary to get Congressional approval before bombing Syria in response to something he saw in the middle of the night on cable tv.
Maybe he was listening to the advice of the future President?
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!
No he didn't need congress but he did what any well thinking president should do,,,, he wanted BI PARTISAN ok on a very delicate move something repubs have zero knowledge ofSo he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
playing politics is getting agreement from both parties?? I didn't know that Thank youNow you're just flinging shit to avoid my point. Obama was playing politics, as always.You're trying hard I guess but you're not that good.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
Try reading the text of the proposed Obama AUMF yourself if you like.
Feel free to point out the objectionable parts.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/aumf_02112015.pdf
In any case, Obama felt it was necessary to get Congressional approval before bombing Syria in response to something he saw in the middle of the night on cable tv.
Maybe he was listening to the advice of the future President?
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!
I call bullshit. He authorized quite a bit that he wanted to and did jack shit about his red line threat. He did nothing about the gassing because "the republicans"? That makes no sense.No he didn't need congress but he did what any well thinking president should do,,,, he wanted BI PARTISAN ok on a very delicate move something repubs have zero knowledge ofSo he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
There's a lot you don't know.playing politics is getting agreement from both parties?? I didn't know that Thank youNow you're just flinging shit to avoid my point. Obama was playing politics, as always.You're trying hard I guess but you're not that good.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
Try reading the text of the proposed Obama AUMF yourself if you like.
Feel free to point out the objectionable parts.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/aumf_02112015.pdf
In any case, Obama felt it was necessary to get Congressional approval before bombing Syria in response to something he saw in the middle of the night on cable tv.
Maybe he was listening to the advice of the future President?
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!
And dying by gassing or barrel bombs makes a difference to you??? And the pos in our WH didn't want obama doing anything either You gd republicans try to have everything both ways and you make me sickI call bullshit. He authorized quite a bit that he wanted to and did jack shit about his red line threat. He did nothing about the gassing because "the republicans"? That makes no sense.No he didn't need congress but he did what any well thinking president should do,,,, he wanted BI PARTISAN ok on a very delicate move something repubs have zero knowledge ofSo he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
The most high profile call came today from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who said right before he headed to the White House for a meeting today that, "The president should be seeking congressional approval, period, for whatever he decides to do -- because that's the way you hear from those of us who represent everyone in the country. That's the way you get congressional support."So he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..You're a fool if you think that a missile is such a precision weapon that it hits only military targets.
Still, the bigger issue is Trump's setting US policy on his knee-jerk reaction to pictures he sees on TV.
That has to be concerning to any thinking person.
Not you of course.
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
Yes, I'm with the civilized world on chemical weapons. Sorry that you are not. I'm not a party member, try not to be too foolish all at once.And dying by gassing or barrel bombs makes a difference to you??? And the pos in our WH didn't want obama doing anything either You gd republicans try to have everything both ways and you make me sickI call bullshit. He authorized quite a bit that he wanted to and did jack shit about his red line threat. He did nothing about the gassing because "the republicans"? That makes no sense.No he didn't need congress but he did what any well thinking president should do,,,, he wanted BI PARTISAN ok on a very delicate move something repubs have zero knowledge ofSo he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
Lawmakers press Obama to seek their input, approval on Syria strikeThe most high profile call came today from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who said right before he headed to the White House for a meeting today that, "The president should be seeking congressional approval, period, for whatever he decides to do -- because that's the way you hear from those of us who represent everyone in the country. That's the way you get congressional support."So he didn't need congress and was grandstanding for political gain. Just what I said.As President Barack Obama orders manned and unmanned surveillance flights over Syria, congressional members are insisting he seek their permission before employing airstrikes in the region.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.LOL..
WE know exactly where those missiles landed. No question about it. The video from them is stored via satellite on servers in the US.
As for Trumps response, he didn't set on his ass (like
Aug 31, 2013
Obama did even after setting up a red line) and let Assad keep killing people with nerve agents.. Trump enforced what Obama was to much of a pussy to enforce..
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
[READ: Obama Approves Islamic State Air Surveillance in Syria]
“For the American people’s sake, Congress should weigh in. Congress should be a part of this,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, said during an appearance on MSNBC. “Congress should own whatever we’re doing militarily.”
Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., also issued a statement Monday requesting Obama to come to Congress before further intervening in Syria or Iraq to address the growing threat of the Islamic State.
“I do not believe that our expanded military operations against [the Islamic State] are covered under existing authorizations from Congress,” Kaine said in a statement. “This fight, and the threat posed by [the Islamic State], is serious enough that Congress and the administration must be united on U.S. policy going forward.”
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...a-to-ask-for-permission-to-intervene-in-syria
On the Senate floor, Sen Tim Kaine, D-Va., said "I rise particularly today to urge the president not just to inform us of what he plans to do but to follow the constitution and seek congressional approval to defeat [ISIS]. I do so for two reasons. First, I don't believe that the President has the authority to, quote, 'go on offense' and wage an open-ended war on [ISIS] without Congressional approval. And second, in making the momentous decision to authorize military action, we owe it to our troops who risk their lives to do our collective job and reach a consensus supporting the military mission that they are ordered to complete."
A short time later, Sen Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., also went to the floor to back up Kaine's comments.
"Any time our country is expected to have a military action, especially in the Middle East again, it needs to have the full support of the American people, and that starts here," he said.
On Capitol Hill, more calls for Obama to seek authorization on ISIS
You realise that you've just shot down your argument, don't you?There's a lot you don't know.playing politics is getting agreement from both parties?? I didn't know that Thank youNow you're just flinging shit to avoid my point. Obama was playing politics, as always.You're trying hard I guess but you're not that good.I don't know the details but obama ALWAYS had a political motive and likely had something objectionable tacked on to it so he could blame Republicans.President Obama abruptly changed course on Saturday and postponed a military strike against the Syrian government in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack so he could seek authorization first from a deeply skeptical Congress.In one of the riskiest gambles of his presidency, Mr. Obama effectively dared lawmakers to either stand by him or, as he put it, allow President Bashar al-Assad of Syria to get away with murdering children with unconventional weapons.
Obama Seeks Approval by Congress for Strike in Syria
Fact is he didn't need congress for air strikes and launched quite a few missiles and drones strikes that were not as high profile.
It appears accuracy is not your goal.
Try reading the text of the proposed Obama AUMF yourself if you like.
Feel free to point out the objectionable parts.
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/aumf_02112015.pdf
In any case, Obama felt it was necessary to get Congressional approval before bombing Syria in response to something he saw in the middle of the night on cable tv.
Maybe he was listening to the advice of the future President?
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!
Lawmakers press Obama to seek their input, approval on Syria strike
As the Obama administration moves ever-closer to a possible military strike on Syria, members of Congress are demanding they at least have a say in the decision -- with some pressuring President Obama to first seek their approval.
It's unclear whether the demands would slow down the administration, as it begins to build the public case for a military strike. One Defense official told Fox News that a U.S. strike is "not a matter of if, but when."
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney stressed Tuesday afternoon that the president has not yet decided to authorize the use of military force. But he made a legal argument for doing so, saying that the United States and 188 other nations are signatories to a chemical weapons convention opposing the use of such weapons, and that there must be a response to a clear violation of those terms.
While officials had indicated the intelligence documents implicating the Assad regime might be released as early as Tuesday, the administration has not yet made them public.
The quickly moving developments, in response to an alleged chemical weapons strike by the Assad regime last week, have lawmakers -- currently on summer recess -- clamoring for influence in a decision that has wide-ranging implications for both the Syrian civil war and the U.S. itself.
Republican Rep. Scott Rigell of Virginia is asking colleagues to sign a letter to Obama that urges him to reconvene Congress and seek approval first for any military action.
Other lawmakers are stopping short of demanding a vote, but still want the administration to bring them into the process before moving ahead.
"I expect the Commander in Chief would consult with Congress in the days ahead as he considers the options available to him," Rep. Buck McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, R-Calif., said in a statement, while urging the administration to "act decisively."
Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, on Tuesday urged the administration to submit a "detailed plan" on the objectives and cost of any strike.
After House Speaker John Boehner's office complained that the White House had not been in touch, a White House official reached out to Boehner Monday afternoon to discuss the Syria situation.
Boehner spokesman Brendan Buck said the speaker, too, "made clear that before any action is taken there must be meaningful consultation with members of Congress, as well as clearly defined objectives and a broader strategy to achieve stability."
Likewise, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said: "Absent an imminent threat to United States national security, the U.S. should not be engaged in military action without congressional approval."
Secretary of State John Kerry has been reaching out to Congress on the sidelines.
Lawmakers, in urging the administration to consult with them, point in part to the War Powers Resolution of 1973. The resolution technically requires the president to seek congressional authorization when the military is sent into "hostilities" for anything but a retaliatory attack or formally declared war. But presidents have routinely flouted or found ways around that resolution -- the resolution, for instance, did not stop Obama from teaming up with Britain and France for airstrikes in Libya against Muammar Qaddafi's government.
The Obama administration seems to be waiting for top allies -- like Britain and France -- to get on board before advancing with any plans to attack Syria.
In Britain, Prime Minister David Cameron has called back Parliament to debate and vote on a Syria plan on Thursday. And in France, President Francois Hollande on Tuesday said France "is ready to punish" those who gassed hundreds in Syria.
In Washington, some members of Congress have long been opposed to intervention in Syria. But a number of high-ranking officials are speaking out in favor of a limited strike. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., was the latest to say a multinational military action would be "appropriate"
Polls over the past year have shown the public is far less interested in getting more deeply involved in Syria. A Fox News poll in July found only 11 percent of voters favored sending weapons to the opposition. Forty-four percent said the U.S. should get out of the conflict entirely.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
