Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,581
- 10,162
- 950
Increased the value of the Ruble, to date. It’s a start…What? Charlie Chaplin? What has Putin done for Russia?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Increased the value of the Ruble, to date. It’s a start…What? Charlie Chaplin? What has Putin done for Russia?
A wake up call for whom? Putin? He shouldn't be woken up to 'push a button'. He should be eliminated before he does it.Of course Putin wouldn't be there, but it sure would be a wake up call.
A wake up call for whom? Putin? He shouldn't be woken up to 'push a button'. He should be eliminated before he does it.
The first angel sounded: And hail and fire followed, mingled with blood, and they were thrown to the earth. And a third of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up.Both America & Russia(then USSR) lost a lot of their peoples during WW2 in a effort to save Europa from itself(nutzism). The Euro-peons just can't let go of the socialism(self enslavement) religion & their worship of their almighty elitist officials. From what I have read Russia puts roughly 70% of it's military budget into both determent & first strike nuclear capability including their SSBM's(Submerged Ship Ballistic Missile). The remaining 30% of Russia's defense budget goes into conventional(non nuclear) military capability. "IF" this is true it may be the primary reason WHY the Russian conventional military forces did not perform as well as expected in the Ukraine.
![]()
Russia Submarine Capabilities
Overview of Russia's submarine capabilities and import-export behavior.www.nti.org
Russia has the largest inventory of nuclear weapons of any country in the world. If push comes to shove Russia has nukes of all types by the numbers no less.
Nuclear Weapons by Country 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
Trying to NATOize countries that border Russia was a serious mistake in my opinion like I preferred the neutral states bordering Russia strategy. Too late now as the cat's out of the bag & it looks like we as humanity cannot get that cat back into the bag. This can only go two ways, statesmanship & an end to current hostilities in eastern Europa, or the situation in eastern Europa heats up to the boiling point. Just pray for peace as advances in weapons technology has made another world war a sure fire loser for all of humanity.
On the contrary, burning Moscow and Leningrad to the ground is an excellent idea.Nuking the Kremlin isn't a good idea.
No such thing as an innocent Russian. Nuke them all.Nope. Putin is broadcasting his European nuclear targets. He better hope they don't take him seriously or someone will nuke the Kremlin. So many innocent Russians would die for Putin's ego.
Russia is not capable of gobbling up Finland or Poland. And it's pretty apparent that Russia is not even capable of gobbling up Ukraine.The US isn't going to attack Russia. Do you want them to gobble up Finland, Poland and Ukraine? Putin is crazy.
I am perfectly aware that Russia keeps renaming the place. I mentioned that multiple times in fact.The city was renamed thirty years ago, just for information.
Wrong. We are entirely capable of massively nuking Russia in retaliation.The West is defenseless against Putin's unstoppable hypersonic missiles.
Don't be silly. There are no plans to place nuclear missiles on Russia's border. NATO doesn't even have those kind of nuclear missiles anymore.What would do USA if the Warsaw Pact wouldn't be dissolved and Russian nukes gonna be placed at the US border directly in Canada and Mexico?
If Russia starts a nuclear war, Moscow and Leningrad will become radioactive craters. And so will all other Russian cities.once the costs of Western interference become meddlesome enough; Russia will likely give Europe the Involvment they clearly want. And I don't think they will like it. While the West think a nuclear war is unwinnable, Russia doesn't have such a pessimistic outlook. Especially at it concerns their first strike capability.
The speed is irrelevant. US ICBMs are just as fast.The image presented is just a "for instance". These missiles are launched from mobile platforms. Neither the point of origin, nor the point of impact, are necessarily the point. The speed in which the strikes can happen is.
Iraq at least knew how to conquer another country.Big difference between Iraqs, and Russias capability to project power, and will. HUGE difference.
We have nuclear bunker busters that can eliminate any Russian bunker.Russias infrastructure has been since the Cold War, and to this day hardened to withstand nuclear strikes. At least to a greater extent than the West. Their subway tunnels have blast doors for instance. That doesn’t mean they won’t get hit. It does mean however that while the West just assumed all players assumed a nuclear exchange was unwinnable; Russia has been hardening the motherland to withstand a nuclear exchange.
So will the rest of NATO. Burning Russian cities will be a lot of fun. We won't want anyone to miss out on it.If Paris is nuked, the French will burn Russia to the ground.
No. They aren't. And NATO knows it. Shill elsewhere. Russia isn't listening...If Russia starts a nuclear war, Moscow and Leningrad will become radioactive craters. And so will all other Russian cities.
The speed is irrelevant. US ICBMs are just as fast.
What matters is that once Russia starts using nukes, we get to destroy Moscow and Leningrad. And then we get to destroy all the rest of Russia's cities.
Iraq at least knew how to conquer another country.
Russia can't seem to figure out how to conquer Ukraine.
We have nuclear bunker busters that can eliminate any Russian bunker.
Let Russia pile all their civilians into those big underground bunkers. They'll be a very thin layer of meat in a mountain sandwich once the endless tons of rock above them drops on their heads.
I hope you're right.No such thing as an innocent Russian. Nuke them all.
Russia is not capable of gobbling up Finland or Poland. And it's pretty apparent that Russia is not even capable of gobbling up Ukraine.
If Russia nukes a NATO target, the US will very much attack Russia. In such a circumstance, we would completely destroy Russia and leave no survivors.
Don't worry. I am.I hope you're right.
Yes they are.No. They aren't. And NATO knows it.
Russia doesn't have to listen. All they have to do is scream and die when we launch our nukes at them.Shill elsewhere. Russia isn't listening...
Anyone who believes it can be won is avnut jobDon't worry. I am.
When I get time I'll post some articles about the unmanned stealth bombers that we are building. Even in a conventional war with NATO, Russia would be relentlessly pummeled until they begged for mercy.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Yes they are.
Russia doesn't have to listen. All they have to do is scream and die when we launch our nukes at them.
I believe that our nukes are capable of eradicating Russia from the face of the planet.Anyone who believes it can be won is a nut job
LolI believe that our nukes are capable of eradicating Russia from the face of the planet.
I don't care if someone calls that winning, or not.
A bully says to you. “Do what I say or I will hurt you and your family.”How?
What would do USA if the Warsaw Pact wouldn't be dissolved and Russian nukes gonna be placed at the US border directly in Canada and Mexico?
Or Russians are idiots who must accept any BS coming from the West?
Russia just isn't that important to the West.A bully says to you. “Do what I say or I will hurt you and your family.”
Putin is saying “Do what I say or I may decide to nuke you and kill millions of people in London, Paris And Berlin.“
So what?Lol
They would do the same to us.
You are the only person in this thread who is lacking in intelligence.But keep being what you are. Stupid