Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The image presented is just a "for instance". These missiles are launched from mobile platforms. Neither the point of origin, nor the point of impact, are necessarily the point. The speed in which the strikes can happen is.That point from which the three trajectories are drawn has just made itself a big first strike target itself.
Interesting point.We stopped Saddam Hussein in Kuwait even though Kuwait was once a province of Iraq and everyone spoke Arabic. Same argument Putin is using.
Putin may be dying.. maybe that's part of this.Interesting point.
Been an aggressive expansionist interest for the past decade. No longer just a servant of its component Nations it has taken on an identity of its own. It Desires money power and prominence seeks to gain such by stimulating military aggression.Both America & Russia(then USSR) lost a lot of their peoples during WW2 in a effort to save Europa from itself(nutzism). The Euro-peons just can't let go of the socialism(self enslavement) religion & their worship of their almighty elitist officials. From what I have read Russia puts roughly 70% of it's military budget into both determent & first strike nuclear capability including their SSBM's(Submerged Ship Ballistic Missile). The remaining 30% of Russia's defense budget goes into conventional(non nuclear) military capability. "IF" this is true it may be the primary reason WHY the Russian conventional military forces did not perform as well as expected in the Ukraine.
Russia Submarine Capabilities
Overview of Russia's submarine capabilities and import-export behavior.www.nti.org
Russia has the largest inventory of nuclear weapons of any country in the world. If push comes to shove Russia has nukes of all types by the numbers no less.
Nuclear Weapons by Country 2024
worldpopulationreview.com
Trying to NATOize countries that border Russia was a serious mistake in my opinion like I preferred the neutral states bordering Russia strategy. Too late now as the cat's out of the bag & it looks like we as humanity cannot get that cat back into the bag. This can only go two ways, statesmanship & an end to current hostilities in eastern Europa, or the situation in eastern Europa heats up to the boiling point. Just pray for peace as advances in weapons technology has made another world war a sure fire loser for all of humanity.
Big difference between Iraqs, and Russias capability to project power, and will. HUGE difference.We stopped Saddam Hussein in Kuwait even though Kuwait was once a province of Iraq and everyone spoke Arabic. Same argument Putin is using.
No question. Iraq was crippled by two decades of war and sanctions.Big difference between Iraqs, and Russias capability to project power, and will. HUGE difference.
... Russia has the largest inventory of nuclear weapons of any country in the world. ...
No, I’m not MAD. I just understand that Russia, and the West have very different philosophies as it pertains to conducting warfare. And that the old MAD trope is really only dearly clung to by the West. New technologies have changed the playing field. Russias infrastructure has been since the Cold War, and to this day hardened to withstand nuclear strikes. At least to a greater extent than the West. Their subway tunnels have blast doors for instance. That doesn’t mean they won’t get hit. It does mean however that while the West just assumed all players assumed a nuclear exchange was unwinnable; Russia has been hardening the motherland to withstand a nuclear exchange.The op is MAD. Pushing Fear and nothing more.
Only a MAD man wants nuclear war. Russia will be just as dead as anyone itvnukes.
Hopefully Putin isnta MAD man. And hopefully the Senile thing in the WH doesnt accidentally hit the red button either.
If either is that stupid then I guess itsbjust human nature to destroy mankind itself.
It will not save them. Even if they live they will be killed bybthe radiation.No, I’m not MAD. I just understand that Russia, and the West have very different philosophies as it pertains to conducting warfare. And that the old MAD trope is really only dearly clung to by the West. New technologies have changed the playing field. Russias infrastructure has been since the Cold War, and to this day hardened to withstand nuclear strikes. At least to a greater extent than the West. Their subway tunnels have blast doors for instance. That doesn’t mean they won’t get hit. It does mean however that while the West just assumed all players assumed a nuclear exchange was unwinnable; Russia has been hardening the motherland to withstand a nuclear exchange.
Why target People who have no say in their government when it's more effective to target the ones who cheated Marcon and Biden into office?
Pestilence = Fauxi Gain of Function Flu
War = WWIII
Who are the other 2 horsemen?
That hinges on the different philosophical definitions of “winning”. If they can survive the strike, and retain enough military capability, and civilian population; they could theoretically relocate their assets to less contaminated areas. To include weaker, bordering nations that haven’t been hit. Like I said they havent just assumed an exchange is not survivable, or unwinnable. They have strategized how to harden themselves so that they could theoretically do just that. What has the US done to make our country survivable in the event of a nuclear strike? Not much outside of preserving the elites, and the continuity of government. The population is screwed. I bet no one on this board has a clue without googling where their nearest fall out shelters are. If they even exist. What their given capacity is. And how long it would take for them to get there. Russia is far better prepped than the US in general to withstand a nuclear strike. The USin general isn’t really prepped at all because of the lazy trope of MAD. So we haven’t even bothered to try.It will not save them. Even if they live they will be killed bybthe radiation.
They are idiots if they believe its winnable. Only issue to me is if Putin is dying and wants the world to die with him.
Hes threatened to use nukes enough that he might be insane
One SSBN with mervs makes anyone a lunatic to think they can win. Would be worse on the survivors. Bad way to goThat hinges on the different philosophical definitions of “winning”. If they can survive the strike, and retain enough military capability, and civilian population; they could theoretically relocate their assets to less contaminated areas. To include weaker, bordering nations that haven’t been hit. Like I said they havent just assumed an exchange is not survivable, or unwinnable. They have strategized how to harden themselves so that they could theoretically do just that. What has the US done to make our country survivable in the event of a nuclear strike? Not much outside of preserving the elites, and the continuity of government. The population is screwed. I bet no one on this board has a clue without googling where their nearest fall out shelters are. If they even exist. What their given capacity is. And how long it would take for them to get there. Russia is far better prepped than the US in general to withstand a nuclear strike. The USin general isn’t really prepped at all because of the lazy trope of MAD. So we haven’t even bothered to try.
Putin is talking about targets in Europe. Biden isn't. It will be a sad day when any US president shoots off his mouth like Putin.The op is MAD. Pushing Fear and nothing more.
Only a MAD man wants nuclear war. Russia will be just as dead as anyone itvnukes.
Hopefully Putin isnta MAD man. And hopefully the Senile thing in the WH doesnt accidentally hit the red button either.
If either is that stupid then I guess itsbjust human nature to destroy mankind itself.
Moscow and Leningrad
Biden, Harris, Pelosi and Schumer are insane also…
No one with any sanity want to be a politician and no one with a soul would enter politics!
