bullwinkle
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 5,446
- 761
Then there's the other side....."There is no historical evidence that tax cuts spur economic growth. The highest period of growth in U.S. history (1933-1973) also saw its highest tax rates on the rich: 70 to 91 percent. During this period, the general tax rate climbed as well, but it reached a plateau in 1969, and growth slowed down five years later. Almost all rich nations have higher general taxes than the U.S., and they are growing faster as well." Tax cuts spur economic growth
It also saw WW2 and the post-war boom years when American industry was supplying the rest of the world because American industry was the only industry not bombed flat. The end of that period coincides with German and Japanese industrial capabilities finally able to no longer need American output.
Yep. Any time somebody uses the 1950s as an example of how high tax rates generate economic success they reveal how incredibly ignorant they are about economics and history. It's kind of sad people can be so uneducated
Trump and Cruz's tax plans would redistribute historic wealth to the rich