Sanders/Trump

[Auld Phart]

Believe it was based on Grant, and his problems post-presidency

 

[TNHarley]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

All ex-presidents are allotted money for office and staff. Shrub gets the same thing, as have all other ex-presidents.

That law was made to keep Presidents out of the gutter. Those rich as fuck, slush fund managers are "embezzling" tax payer money to fund their charity employee salaries.
There is no viable reason why I should have to pay their charity employee salaries. ESPECIALLY when they are worth millions. And their charity is probably worth more than that.
Try again, hack.

I'm not aware of any ex-president who would be in the gutter without government paid for office and staff. If they were that bad off, they wouldn't need office or staff anyway.

Jefferson, Monroe and Truman are a few.
Granted, the first couple had to pay their own expenses while serving..
Presidents get pensions, expenses paid and all kinds of shit. I don't see WHY we have to pay them anything after that. ESPECIALLY for something like a slush fund.
Its sad you think that's ok.. ESPECIALLY since you KNOW they don't need it.

 

[TNHarley]

Believe it was based on Grant, and his problems post-presidency

I think you might be right. But for some reason, Eisenhower is ringing in my head. Maybe he was just the first to actually receive the benefits?

 

[Auld Phart]

Believe it was based on Grant, and his problems post-presidency

I think you might be right. But for some reason, Eisenhower is ringing in my head. Maybe he was just the first to actually receive the benefits?

He was

 

[BULLDOG]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

All ex-presidents are allotted money for office and staff. Shrub gets the same thing, as have all other ex-presidents.

That law was made to keep Presidents out of the gutter. Those rich as fuck, slush fund managers are "embezzling" tax payer money to fund their charity employee salaries.
There is no viable reason why I should have to pay their charity employee salaries. ESPECIALLY when they are worth millions. And their charity is probably worth more than that.
Try again, hack.

I'm not aware of any ex-president who would be in the gutter without government paid for office and staff. If they were that bad off, they wouldn't need office or staff anyway.

Jefferson, Monroe and Truman are a few.
Granted, the first couple had to pay their own expenses while serving..
Presidents get pensions, expenses paid and all kinds of shit. I don't see WHY we have to pay them anything after that. ESPECIALLY for something like a slush fund.
Its sad you think that's ok.. ESPECIALLY since you KNOW they don't need it.

A retired CEO of a corporation probably doesn't need a big retirement either, but the ex-leader of the free world has earned a few perks. Are you opposed to this benefit for all presidents, or do you just want to whine about Clinton's retirement?

 

[g5000]

it may come down to it ..

will Trump attack Bernie like he does Jeb, or Rafael ?

will that type of attack turn voters away from Trump ?


I ask because of this ...

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Sanders

Every time Trump hits a competitor below the belt, his popularity rises. There's no reason to think it would be different with Sanders or Clinton.

If and when Trump turns his focus on the Democrat, whoever it is, the fun times will continue.

 

[g5000]

Trump versus Clinton:

She's probably got a Swiss bank account for all the money she's stolen. I don't know. Maybe.

She'll get us nuked by Iran. Believe me.

Don't get me wrong. I like her. But she'll take more time off then Hopey McChangepants. She hasn't come out the other side of that menopause in good shape, you know?

 

[Care4all]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

From your link:

Bill Clinton’s payments from the fund, which is administered by the General Services Administration, appear to be compliant with government guidelines

The more you all lie about them, the more I will support them.

You want Bernie to win because you believe you can beat him easier than Clinton in the election....

You are easy on him now, but you will smear him fom here to high heaven on not having his first paying job until 40, which has already had a right wing thread, on him being a socialist, with a capital S, you will scare people about his old age, you will do everything you can do to cream him.

You know it, and I know it, and everyone but Bernie supporters know it.

Be honest for a change.

 

[BULLDOG]

it may come down to it ..

will Trump attack Bernie like he does Jeb, or Rafael ?

will that type of attack turn voters away from Trump ?


I ask because of this ...

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Sanders

Every time Trump hits a competitor below the belt, his popularity rises. There's no reason to think it would be different with Sanders or Clinton.

If and when Trump turns his focus on the Democrat, whoever it is, the fun times will continue.

I don't think Trump will make it that far. The GOP is still working hard to discard him.

 

[g5000]

Trump versus Sanders:

Do we want to become the next Soviet Union? I don't think so.

He'll get us nuked by Iran. Believe me.

He's senile. He thinks it's 1917 and he's Lenin.

 

[TNHarley]

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

All ex-presidents are allotted money for office and staff. Shrub gets the same thing, as have all other ex-presidents.

That law was made to keep Presidents out of the gutter. Those rich as fuck, slush fund managers are "embezzling" tax payer money to fund their charity employee salaries.
There is no viable reason why I should have to pay their charity employee salaries. ESPECIALLY when they are worth millions. And their charity is probably worth more than that.
Try again, hack.

I'm not aware of any ex-president who would be in the gutter without government paid for office and staff. If they were that bad off, they wouldn't need office or staff anyway.

Jefferson, Monroe and Truman are a few.
Granted, the first couple had to pay their own expenses while serving..
Presidents get pensions, expenses paid and all kinds of shit. I don't see WHY we have to pay them anything after that. ESPECIALLY for something like a slush fund.
Its sad you think that's ok.. ESPECIALLY since you KNOW they don't need it.

A retired CEO of a corporation probably doesn't need a big retirement either, but the ex-leader of the free world has earned a few perks. Are you opposed to this benefit for all presidents, or do you just want to whine about Clinton's retirement?

I don't want to see a President in the street. Even Clinton. But they are RICH AS FUCK. There is NO fuckin need for the taxpayers to have to pay for it. They are just gaming the system and its fuckin sickening.
Yea, she will really "care about the middle class".

 

[g5000]

I can't believe people are whining about the President's pension. He gets paid less than a New York Yankee.

This isn't what has caused our debt, people. Look in the mirror.

 

[TNHarley]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

From your link:

Bill Clinton’s payments from the fund, which is administered by the General Services Administration, appear to be compliant with government guidelines

The more you all lie about them, the more I will support them.

You want Bernie to win because you believe you can beat him easier than Clinton in the election....

You are easy on him now, but you will smear him fom here to high heaven on not having his first paying job until 40, which has already had a right wing thread, on him being a socialist, with a capital S, you will scare people about his old age, you will do everything you can do to cream him.

You know it, and I know it, and everyone but Bernie supporters know it.

Be honest for a change.

I didn't lie. They are using tax payer money to fund their charity employees salaries. Those slush fund managers are RICH AS FUCK. They are gaming the system and its fuckin sickening. With you being OK with that, so are you.
No I don't think that, actually. Nor will I give Bernie a harder time than I am now. I will even vote for him over 80% of the republicans. But whatever

 

[TNHarley]

I can't believe people are whining about the President's pension. He gets paid less than a New York Yankee.

This isn't what has caused our debt, people. Look in the mirror.

Who is whining about the Presidents pension? Oh, you mean them taking advantage of that legislation to pay for their charity employees salaries?

 

[TNHarley]

If I served my 8 year term as President and decided to start a business, none of you sick minded fucks would care if you guys paid my employees salaries? Even if I was worth a hundred million dollars and my actual business was worth hundreds of millions more?

 

[the_human_being]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

From your link:

Bill Clinton’s payments from the fund, which is administered by the General Services Administration, appear to be compliant with government guidelines

The more you all lie about them, the more I will support them.

You want Bernie to win because you believe you can beat him easier than Clinton in the election....

You are easy on him now, but you will smear him fom here to high heaven on not having his first paying job until 40, which has already had a right wing thread, on him being a socialist, with a capital S, you will scare people about his old age, you will do everything you can do to cream him.

You know it, and I know it, and everyone but Bernie supporters know it.

Be honest for a change.

Damn straight. We'll take that Commie down hard,

 

[Care4all]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

From your link:

Bill Clinton’s payments from the fund, which is administered by the General Services Administration, appear to be compliant with government guidelines

The more you all lie about them, the more I will support them.

You want Bernie to win because you believe you can beat him easier than Clinton in the election....

You are easy on him now, but you will smear him fom here to high heaven on not having his first paying job until 40, which has already had a right wing thread, on him being a socialist, with a capital S, you will scare people about his old age, you will do everything you can do to cream him.

You know it, and I know it, and everyone but Bernie supporters know it.

Be honest for a change.

I didn't lie. They are using tax payer money to fund their charity employees salaries. Those slush fund managers are RICH AS FUCK. They are gaming the system and its fuckin sickening. With you being OK with that, so are you.
No I don't think that, actually. Nor will I give Bernie a harder time than I am now. I will even vote for him over 80% of the republicans. But whatever

sure

 

[TNHarley]

right wingers definitely want to see Sanders win the nomination!

Yes. Because corrupt cankles is the absolute WORST one that could be picked.
Tell me, would you hire someone when they are ALREADY embezzling from you?
Taxpayer tab for Clinton Inc.: $16 million
Clinton foundation officials brushed aside questions about use of public monies to supplement staff salaries there.
Clinton “is allocated funding for an office and for attendant costs (rent, utilities and salaries and benefits for staff),” foundation officials said in an emailed statement. “His office is allocated $96,000 per year for personnel salaries. GSA does not dictate the number of staff for whom the allocation is used.”

Doesn't make much sense, does it?

From your link:

Bill Clinton’s payments from the fund, which is administered by the General Services Administration, appear to be compliant with government guidelines

The more you all lie about them, the more I will support them.

You want Bernie to win because you believe you can beat him easier than Clinton in the election....

You are easy on him now, but you will smear him fom here to high heaven on not having his first paying job until 40, which has already had a right wing thread, on him being a socialist, with a capital S, you will scare people about his old age, you will do everything you can do to cream him.

You know it, and I know it, and everyone but Bernie supporters know it.

Be honest for a change.

I didn't lie. They are using tax payer money to fund their charity employees salaries. Those slush fund managers are RICH AS FUCK. They are gaming the system and its fuckin sickening. With you being OK with that, so are you.
No I don't think that, actually. Nor will I give Bernie a harder time than I am now. I will even vote for him over 80% of the republicans. But whatever

sure

lol that's pathetic. I thought you were different from the typical hacks on the left. Guess I was wrong. Might start calling you care4derp or gunocare.

 

[blackhawk]

No matter who is elected the country will lose its just a question of how bad.