Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so adam would have got them from someone else....
If I get hit by a drunk driver, you goddamn right I am about to sue Jim Beam and chevy. Their SOLE purposes are to be driven and get drunk.
There is nothing in the product gun manufacturers make that causes addiction. Your argument is false.
Of course, you right wingers and gun rights proponents are missing the point.....either purposefully or by stupidity. At Sandy Hook, first graders were not "just killed" but torn into pieces by a maniac with a gun intended to be used in military combat..Such guns should NOT be sold to common citizens. The only purpose to sell such guns are either to kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes....OR to satisfy the "machismo" of morons.i
We can legally obtain surface to air missiles, so your argument fails the logic test.Of course, you right wingers and gun rights proponents are missing the point.....either purposefully or by stupidity. At Sandy Hook, first graders were not "just killed" but torn into pieces by a maniac with a gun intended to be used in military combat..Such guns should NOT be sold to common citizens. The only purpose to sell such guns are either to kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes....OR to satisfy the "machismo" of morons.i
So......liar....
gun suicides.....21,175
Accidental gun deaths... 505
Gun murder ......8,124
Why? Why shouldn't citizens be able to have the same weapons their government has? ESPECIALLY when they have a second amendment.If the gun worked properly how can the manufacturer be held liable....for anything?....
The point is so simple that it defies logic.....The point IS that such lethal weapons should NEVER be sold to common citizens.
Why? Why shouldn't citizens be able to have the same weapons their government has? ESPECIALLY when they have a second amendment.
There are other violent crimes besides homicides you know
And in the UK they don't classify a any death as a murder unless someone is convicted of murder
House of Commons - Home Affairs - Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence
Look at section 2 paragraph 35
. Since 1967, homicide figures for England and Wales have been adjusted to exclude any cases which do not result in conviction,
We call any death not deemed suicide or an accident a murder
Its the CONSUMERS choice. THEY are the responsible party. Do you know what responsible means?If I get hit by a drunk driver, you goddamn right I am about to sue Jim Beam and chevy. Their SOLE purposes are to be driven and get drunk.
Ah but it isn't the purpose that they (drinking and driving) be done TOGETHER.
But let's say I own a gun shop. Right outside of Chicago. And my gun shop sells a LOT of guns. Straw buyers, gang bangers everybody knows where to get guns. And the gun manufacturers know of my reputation and they keep selling me guns.
Should that be stopped by suing the gun manufacturers?
Of course, you right wingers and gun rights proponents are missing the point.....either purposefully or by stupidity. At Sandy Hook, first graders were not "just killed" but torn into pieces by a maniac with a gun intended to be used in military combat..Such guns should NOT be sold to common citizens.
The only purpose to sell such guns are either to kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes....OR to satisfy the "machismo" of morons.i
If the gun worked properly how can the manufacturer be held liable....for anything?....
The point is so simple that it defies logic.....The point IS that such lethal weapons should NEVER be sold to common citizens.
On what constitutional basis?
Of course, you right wingers and gun rights proponents are missing the point.....either purposefully or by stupidity. At Sandy Hook, first graders were not "just killed" but torn into pieces by a maniac with a gun intended to be used in military combat..Such guns should NOT be sold to common citizens. The only purpose to sell such guns are either to kill as many people in the shortest number of minutes....OR to satisfy the "machismo" of morons.i
He could have walked into that classroom and killed those children with a chef's knife. You're the one missing the point. The people that make weapons are not responsible for the crimes committed by maniacs.
On what constitutional basis?
"Constitution be damned! My feelings and assumptions are more important!"
Inevitably, gun proponents and the NRA will claim that the latest ruling allowing families of the Sandy Hook massacre of children, is a ridiculous ruling.....They will follow up with various scenarios that were someone to be killed by a knife or a rope, that knives and rope manufacturers could ALSO be sued....but when making such comparisons they show both their prejudices and downright stupidity.
Guns are manufactured virtually SOLELY for the purpose of killing....whereas knives or ropes have much different purposes and the flooding of some high-crime areas with weapons whose main purpose is killing of maiming is totally unacceptable.
This ruling is a small but necessary first step toward restoring sanity. The Sandy Hook massacre could not have been as lethal with knives or ropes. Let us join the rest of the sane, and progressive world community where those weapons (mostly made for military purposes) do NOT make their way into deranged and evil hands.
