Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We still have the right to designate who gets an organ that we donate when there is opportunity to do that. It is just illegal--for excellent reasons--to sell somebody an organ and no reputable medical facility would tolerate such a practice.
Cedars-Sinai Hospital is adament that Dick Cheney got no special treatment whatsoever--if money was a factor he would not have had to wait 20 months. At the time his new heart became available, he was deemed healthy enough to receive it, there were no people ahead of him that were a match. Try not to be too judgmental folks until you are on one of those waiting lists yourself. I recently lost a precious cousin who had been on the kidney transplant list for years, but each time one became available, she had other health issues that made it inadvisable for her to have the surgery. Until you know the facts, don't judge.
I won't presume to play God and say what Sarah and/or her parents should or should not have done. I can believe Sarah wants to live and wanted that chance. If it was my child, would I condemn her to die by refusing a lung when it was available? It is unfortunate that both sets of lungs that were made available to Sarah were damaged or compromised and nobody knows if the second transplant is going to take. She is still on a breathing tube today.
I would never be on one of those lists.
Until I am in the position that a transplant is necessary to save my life, I cannot say what I would decide about that.
I am pretty damn sure I would do whatever I could do to save my child, however. What you would decide re your own life or that of your child is your business. I won't judge you. And I won't accept your judgment as valid for me.
Still say there should be a free market for organs and body parts. The central planning of the organ market keeps supply well below demand and ensures costs remain high due to a lack of competition...just like every government-imposed monopoly.
But hey, there are plenty of humans, right?![]()
There used to be. Its called China.
Still say there should be a free market for organs and body parts. The central planning of the organ market keeps supply well below demand and ensures costs remain high due to a lack of competition...just like every government-imposed monopoly.
But hey, there are plenty of humans, right?![]()
There used to be. Its called China.
A free market...in China.![]()
Yep. There was a dude here that no Dr. Would transplant, so he went to China and they sold him a liver from an exicuted convict. Laws were passed on this country since to ban this, but china still sells there convicts organs.
Just going by what was in the article. It stated they cut the bad parts away. In both cases I got the impression both sets of organs were inferior.
Organs are often less than 100% healthy. In a case of a child like this, a partially compromised lung would be better put into a child sice the trimming of the lung could consist of removing the damaged parts.
For another six months to a year of life ? The Dr.'s had it right. They shod have made the kid Comfortable and her parents should have accepted reality. We are Humans. We get sick, and we die.
Hear that, folks? The lungs she received FAILED and she has had a second transplant.
The first set of lungs lasted barely hours after the surgery, and she was placed on VA ECMO, a bypass machine, which would keep her alive for a week.
A second set of lungs was donated (adult, again) and she has had her second transplant.
See, this could have been predicted. Adult lungs do not belong in the body of a child:
Sarah Murnaghan Gets Second Lung Transplant, First Failed: Family | NBC 10 Philadelphia
The new lungs are infected with pneumonia. Great, giving a set of infected lungs to a kid with infected lungs. That's fucked up.
Sorry folks, but not trying is worse than failure.
And this case is disgusting. Two sets of inferior lungs, thousands of dollars spent, like,y thousands in debt for an 11 year old who isn't even going to live. They are torturing that child.
One thing I will correct is the second set of lungs did not have pneumonia. The person with them had a history of pneumonia but they would not transplant a set of lungs from a person currently suffering from pneumonia.
Organs are often less than 100% healthy. In a case of a child like this, a partially compromised lung would be better put into a child sice the trimming of the lung could consist of removing the damaged parts.
For another six months to a year of life ? The Dr.'s had it right. They shod have made the kid Comfortable and her parents should have accepted reality. We are Humans. We get sick, and we die.
No. If the transplant takes, then there is no reason the lungs cannot extend her life way beyond that.
If you're an adult and you need new lungs, you also won't last more than a year or two if the lungs don't take or the disease also infects the new lung.
The young are more often the better choices for transplants for obvious reasons.
For another six months to a year of life ? The Dr.'s had it right. They shod have made the kid Comfortable and her parents should have accepted reality. We are Humans. We get sick, and we die.
No. If the transplant takes, then there is no reason the lungs cannot extend her life way beyond that.
If you're an adult and you need new lungs, you also won't last more than a year or two if the lungs don't take or the disease also infects the new lung.
The young are more often the better choices for transplants for obvious reasons.
So far the outlook has not improved for the little girl. At least not according to anything I have read in the media for what that's worth.
No. If the transplant takes, then there is no reason the lungs cannot extend her life way beyond that.
If you're an adult and you need new lungs, you also won't last more than a year or two if the lungs don't take or the disease also infects the new lung.
The young are more often the better choices for transplants for obvious reasons.
So far the outlook has not improved for the little girl. At least not according to anything I have read in the media for what that's worth.
Sometimes these things take time.
So far the outlook has not improved for the little girl. At least not according to anything I have read in the media for what that's worth.
Sometimes these things take time.
True dat. And for what its worth, I hope this kid whips this things ass and lives to a ripe old age.
if I recall correctly the panel that makes or made the rule ala who gets 'lungs' etc. delineated the boundaries, were Doctors...it didn't just appear out of nowhere, that had been the rules for a while.
sarah got that changed by a judge, becasue her parents found a way to surface and bring attention to their case, Sibelius was exactly right when she said she could not change the rules ( and if she had she would be as wrong as the judge inho).
Look, if the new paradigm is who yells loudest and best able to manage the press etc. as to how care is meted out, we are in deep shit.
This may sound harsh but I cannot think of anyway other way to say it- sarah may be cute and her parents successful at extending her life or giving her the opportunity to live, but, if this second set of lungs fails too, they have taken 2 sets of lungs that would have had provided much better odds as laid out by those doctors, given to the patients who had the best chances of integrating/utilizing them.
I said it then and I included every politician who got involved from each party and every media outlet, Fox, abc et al. Using emotional appeals to drive distribution of care is dishonest. If we are not going to let Doctors make those rules and turn it over to the judiciary, well, its going to be chaos.
This is a highly charged very emotional issue because literally we do not have enough organs to be able to save people.
I pity the "deciders". What a burden to bear.
I'm conflicted on many medical issues politically of course as we all are, but when one steps away from the keyboard and into those doctors shoes......
I couldn't do what they do.
I say fuck the deciders. What right do they have to decide anything ?a
I hope she makes it .... but if she doesn't, at least her parents know they did all they could.
Sadly, there are things in life that are beyond our hands.![]()
I hope she makes it .... but if she doesn't, at least her parents know they did all they could.
Sadly, there are things in life that are beyond our hands.![]()
Yes. But 10 years old is old enough to make some choices. She knew what would be done to her and that it was going to hurt and I'm pretty sure she also knew she might not make it. Kids are so perceptive; they just know about stuff like that sometimes. But she wanted it. As her mom, or her doctor, or her friend, I could not have told her no, when there was a chance for yes. Most especially when a no was a certain death sentence for Sarah.
The parents accepted damaged lungs for Sarah to give her a chance. Without that chance she had no chance.
Fox using this as a political football was/is shameless isn't it Katzndogz?