Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,200
Holyfuckingshit!Your "explanation" is a lie since they didn't count those people when Clinton was president or when Bush was president. Nothing changed in that regard during Obama's presidency.Unemployment:How many under Bush were part time? How many under Bush were illegal How many under Bush were minimum wage.
You assholes have an excuse for everything. Obama started with an ecomony losing 800,000 jobs a month & shrinking at a rate of 6.2%.
Your buddy Bush started with a balanced budget on the path to paying down the debt & left with an economy losing 800,000 jobs a month & shrinking at a rate of 6.2%.
Eat that, asswipe.
when did I ever say that Bush was a great president? eat that asswipe.
the facts are that Bush screwed up and Obama made his screw ups worse.
Bush ..... 4.2% to 7.8% (+86%)
Obama .. 7.8% to 4.9% (-37%)
Dow:
Bush ..... 10.6K to 8.3K (-22%)
Obama .... 8.3K to 19.2K (+132%)
Lying Redfish calls that worse under Obama.
![]()
I already explained how they no longer count people who have given up looking for work in the unemployment numbers.
Liar = you
The same policies rightwingnuts offer as the reason for the rise in the stock market since the election.I am still waiting for you to tell us which specific obozo policies CAUSED the market rally.
U.S. changes how it measures long-term unemployment - USATODAY.com
The Official Unemployment Rate Is Wrong, Says Guy Who Used To Calculate It | The Huffington Post
Note the date on the articles - compare that date to the change in the unemployment rate on the charts you posted.
Quite a coincidence, huh?
![eusa_doh :eusa_doh: :eusa_doh:](/styles/smilies/eusa_doh.gif)
File this under 'C' for conservatives are fucking retards.
![cuckoo :cuckoo: :cuckoo:](/styles/smilies/cuckoo.gif)
That's not a change to how the unemployment rate is calculated. That changed the definition of long term unemployment, which was folks out of work from 2 years, to include anyone out of work for 5 years. That had absolutely no affect on the unemployment rate.
And moron .... long term unemployment is not part of the methodology employed to calculate any of the BLS's measures of labor underutilization, U-1 through U-6.
"The change will not affect how the unemployed are counted or the unemployment rate is computed nor how long those eligible for unemployment benefits receive them."
![1233796371590.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.chan4chan.com%2Fimg%2F2009-02-05%2F1233796371590.gif&hash=4ad4101acd71c95fc77758348274b955)
Last edited: