well, i thought that whole diatribe was sarcasm, but, i'm not so sure nowHAHA, wow. I can't believe I missed that.
but it sure was all factually incorrect
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well, i thought that whole diatribe was sarcasm, but, i'm not so sure nowHAHA, wow. I can't believe I missed that.
Lololololol......Obama's mayorship......
you make a mistake(and a HUGE one) and you call HER numbnuts?I meant leadership numnuts, you know something a senator of the 13th district (chicago) would do. It does not matter though, because clearly you are making a left turn away from the fact that Palin has governed less people than my right nut.
you make a mistake(and a HUGE one) and you call HER numbnuts?
A typo!Is this one too?
Face it man, your mind is clouded with hate!
Whatever. It wasn't a "typing mistake" either, but a complete misunderstanding of facts.A Typo is a mis-spelling glock, a typing mistake is a complete sentence mistake which I conceded hours ago. What is your point?
Second. My mind is not clouded with hate, as I said before I was going to vote for Mccain, before Palin joined the ticket.
Whatever. It wasn't a "typing mistake" either, but a complete misunderstanding of facts.
"Calculations"? Another "typing error", perhaps?![]()
Actually my rep count was one of the highest here before I pissed of Darin (by proving him wrong) and he zeroed me out. Darin's since been shit-canned or is simply too embarrassed to post anymore. Ask Gunny for details.Did you even read my post? Yes, calculations. The simple mathematical fact that If I had posted over 4,000 reply's (like you did), I would be "sitting on 30 rep power". (Twice your rep power). Do the math, you posted 6 times as many posts as I, yet only boast 3 times as much rep power. Which as I said before, the people of this board have made it clear that they believe I am TWICE as likely to get it right than you are.
you didnt back it with facts, you backed it with some moronic list of liesWell when your typing really fast and you are human like I am, sometimes you make mistakes without notice. That was a typing mistake not a departure from common sense much as you seem to have mastered. By the way, I could care less if you negative rep me, Its stupid. I have been against that system since day one and yet people STILL give me rep power despite my attempts to abolish the system. In-fact I have over a hundred less posts and yet more rep power than you. That should tell you two things. One, your wasting your time repping me, two.....I must be doing something right, that you are not doing.
Lastly, again you dodged the debate here. The debate is not my ability to avoid mistakes as you have made it to be, the debate is Sarah Palin. What I have learned with years of education and dealing with people like you is, you latch on to something that makes you feel confident, even if it is a one way train OUT of the conversation. Man up, learn to stick to the debate. In the real world, you would not last one second with those meaningless tactics and pathetic repping excuse.
Let me help you, I stated that Palin is a liar, and backed that with facts. Now your turn.
I meant leadership numnuts, you know something a senator of the 13th district (chicago) would do. It does not matter though, because clearly you are making a left turn away from the fact that Palin has governed less people than my right nut.
then you dont know how the rep system worksDid you even read my post? Yes, calculations. The simple mathematical fact that If I had posted over 4,000 reply's (like you did), I would be "sitting on 30 rep power". (Twice your rep power). Do the math, you posted 6 times as many posts as I, yet only boast 3 times as much rep power. Which as I said before, the people of this board have made it clear that they believe I am TWICE as likely to get it right than you are.
you didnt back it with facts, you backed it with some moronic list of lies