Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good to see you are still lying no matter how many times you get called out.Perhaps if the GOP wasn`t so anti worker...
Thanks to an 'Anti-worker' Republican / Republicans, workers are reaping the benefits of:
The best economy in decades
Lowest in-employment in decades
More jobs
More full-time jobs
Raises
Bonuses
Fewer people on food stamps / welfare
Higher home values
Not being forced to pay Union dues...
Democrats promise to:
Raise Taxes
Decrease the # of jobs
Eliminate raises
Eliminate bonuses
Higher unemployment
More people in Welfare / food stamps
Seizing more of their money for illegals
Etc...
Trump needs to replace Kennedy and Ginsburg ASAP/----/ Do you think there will be any retirements?Wow.
Supreme Court rules non-union workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions
Supreme Court rules in Janus labor union case
Retirement speculation shadows court’s final day
Isn't Thomas thinking about retirement too? I don't think Ginsburg is going to quit while Trump is in office.
She didn't quit for Obama, she'll quit for Trump
ok so why would a company that is willing to pay union wages and benefits even have a union there?...why would its employees want to pay union dues if they knew that the place they work at takes care of them as good or better than a union?...a question....will the non union people get the same pay and benefits as the union members,or will they have to take whatever the company wants to give them?...The far right of the GOP wants to put union members down on the plantation.
No, idiot. We want to give everyone the same opportunity to work wherever they want to, without being forced into a union.
And that's what the SC just did.
Why would a company drive the non union employee into the arms of the union?
/----/ Ginsberg is a firecracker and has many more years on the court...Trump needs to replace Kennedy and Ginsburg ASAP/----/ Do you think there will be any retirements?Wow.
Supreme Court rules non-union workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions
Supreme Court rules in Janus labor union case
Retirement speculation shadows court’s final day
Isn't Thomas thinking about retirement too? I don't think Ginsburg is going to quit while Trump is in office.
She didn't quit for Obama, she'll quit for Trump
I cannot imagine Ginsburg quitting for Trump, she hates the guy.
Good question, I think the benefit of this ruling is the unions now have to work for support, before it was automatic and they could do what they wanted, now if people don't like their politics or other things, they can say no.a question....will the non union people get the same pay and benefits as the union members,or will they have to take whatever the company wants to give them?...The far right of the GOP wants to put union members down on the plantation.
No, idiot. We want to give everyone the same opportunity to work wherever they want to, without being forced into a union.
And that's what the SC just did.
ok so why would a company that is willing to pay union wages and benefits even have a union there?...why would its employees want to pay union dues if they knew that the place they work at takes care of them as good or better than a union?...a question....will the non union people get the same pay and benefits as the union members,or will they have to take whatever the company wants to give them?...The far right of the GOP wants to put union members down on the plantation.
No, idiot. We want to give everyone the same opportunity to work wherever they want to, without being forced into a union.
And that's what the SC just did.
Why would a company drive the non union employee into the arms of the union?
Lucy, you know you hate the every day working man, whether white or black or brown, and you want business to exploit him or her. Go ahead and admit it. It will good for your soul. Admit your hate and let it go.The far right of the GOP wants to put union members down on the plantation.
Yes they do they want to put them down on the plantation where the Leftists keep their Blacks, the best solution is put all the Union leaders and Union Agitators on the plantation and liberate the Blacks off the Democrat plantation.
The conservative justices that gifted premium rights to corporations were activist judges. Conservatives are not inherently constitutionalists.You're confused. Activist judges create new laws out of whole cloth with disregard to the US Constitution. These judges make rulings based on the original intent of the Constitution. It's ok if you're confused, liberals work off of emotions instead of logic.Are they still activist judges?SCOTUS giving the right victory after victory
I worked several years for a large manufacturing corporation.Agree....back in the day a major function of the union was worker safety...the government took that over in the 70's. I have no problem with unions or today's decision. As long as non-union workers don't automatically get the benefits the members negotiated for, what difference does it make?
/---"gifted premium rights "The conservative justices that gifted premium rights to corporations were activist judges. Conservatives are not inherently constitutionalists.You're confused. Activist judges create new laws out of whole cloth with disregard to the US Constitution. These judges make rulings based on the original intent of the Constitution. It's ok if you're confused, liberals work off of emotions instead of logic.Are they still activist judges?SCOTUS giving the right victory after victory
There, there snowflake...Good to see you are still lying no matter how many times you get called out.Perhaps if the GOP wasn`t so anti worker...
Thanks to an 'Anti-worker' Republican / Republicans, workers are reaping the benefits of:
The best economy in decades
Lowest in-employment in decades
More jobs
More full-time jobs
Raises
Bonuses
Fewer people on food stamps / welfare
Higher home values
Not being forced to pay Union dues...
Democrats promise to:
Raise Taxes
Decrease the # of jobs
Eliminate raises
Eliminate bonuses
Higher unemployment
More people in Welfare / food stamps
Seizing more of their money for illegals
Etc...
First quarter growth was only 2.2%. Stocks are way below their high. Labor force participation is very low. Wages are stagnant. Deficits are skyrocketing....
so they can get the union benefits and pay but dont have to join them.....seems hypocritical....are they forced to pay dues to private sector ones?...Wow.
Supreme Court rules non-union workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions
Supreme Court rules in Janus labor union case
In some states, a private sector union can still require an employee to pay what is called "agency fees", meaning just the costs to represent them. You don't have to join the union, but you have to pay that fee. Not so anymore for public unions.
Perhaps if the GOP wasn`t so anti worker some of the money would go to their coffers.
Why would someone who doesn`t like being a union member want to work in a unionized shop?
Do they think good wages and benefits come via the generosity of the plantation owners? Are all republicans that stupid?
Forcast for 4.5% in Q2Good to see you are still lying no matter how many times you get called out.Perhaps if the GOP wasn`t so anti worker...
Thanks to an 'Anti-worker' Republican / Republicans, workers are reaping the benefits of:
The best economy in decades
Lowest in-employment in decades
More jobs
More full-time jobs
Raises
Bonuses
Fewer people on food stamps / welfare
Higher home values
Not being forced to pay Union dues...
Democrats promise to:
Raise Taxes
Decrease the # of jobs
Eliminate raises
Eliminate bonuses
Higher unemployment
More people in Welfare / food stamps
Seizing more of their money for illegals
Etc...
First quarter growth was only 2.2%. Stocks are way below their high. Labor force participation is very low. Wages are stagnant. Deficits are skyrocketing....
so they can get the union benefits and pay but dont have to join them.....seems hypocritical....are they forced to pay dues to private sector ones?...Wow.
Supreme Court rules non-union workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions
Supreme Court rules in Janus labor union case
In some states, a private sector union can still require an employee to pay what is called "agency fees", meaning just the costs to represent them. You don't have to join the union, but you have to pay that fee. Not so anymore for public unions.
I'm not sure if you can see this or not, but that argument is really weak.Because those non-union workers are enjoying the benefits union workers fought for.Good deal! If I read that right, this applies to government unions, correct? If so, they made the right decision.
Why should a non-union worker have to pay anything to a Union they aren't part of?
When I was a college kid the steel mills around here were foing great guns. They offered college students summer jobs in the mills. The pay was fantastic, far more than a kid could earn at a Dairy Queen or a hardware store. That money helped out a lot. And I was grateful to kick in a portion of my pay to the USW so I could earn enough to pay for school.
For years, I was a non union member at the state, which had a union for its employees. I eventually joined for some benefit or other that required union membership--I can't remember which. ANYWAY, for a few of those years I WASN'T a union member, they were taking a small percentage of what my union dues would have been. Is this what the decision is about? If so, is it retroactive? Maybe I should start looking for a check in the mail?It seems like the right decision. Why should non-Union members be forced to pay. But again, 5-4? What are these Liberal judges doing???
/----/ I think you gun grabbers should be forced to pay NRA membership dues but not have to actually join. You will continue to receive protection of your 2nd Amendment rights.so they can get the union benefits and pay but dont have to join them.....seems hypocritical....are they forced to pay dues to private sector ones?...Wow.
Supreme Court rules non-union workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions
Supreme Court rules in Janus labor union case
In some states, a private sector union can still require an employee to pay what is called "agency fees", meaning just the costs to represent them. You don't have to join the union, but you have to pay that fee. Not so anymore for public unions.
Just you, Jake, just you.The far right of the GOP wants to put union members down on the plantation.
For years, I was a non union member at the state, which had a union for its employees. I eventually joined for some benefit or other that required union membership--I can't remember which. ANYWAY, for a few of those years I WASN'T a union member, they were taking a small percentage of what my union dues would have been. Is this what the decision is about? If so, is it retroactive? Maybe I should start looking for a check in the mail?It seems like the right decision. Why should non-Union members be forced to pay. But again, 5-4? What are these Liberal judges doing???
