SC Teacher Used Limbaugh's Book To Teach Third Graders About Slavery

I guess this is why so many self-proclaimed Conservatives don't like teachers

Can you believe this crap?

SC Teacher Used Limbaugh's Book To Teach Third Graders About Slavery

Are you cool with this? Is this OK w/you?

So, she used a thruthful, factual book dealing with the history of this great land and you and others of your ilk are enraged about it?

To me, it means the book must be setting the record straight - something liberans and progressive refuse to deal with.

Really gets your goat, doesn't it, that all THREE of Rush's books are selling like crazy!
 
Did you ever wonder why they are called ditto heads? It is because they can't critically think for themselves. Poor poor lemmings of an angry white man who is seeing his world view collapse around him.

Nobody has done more to destroy our future than Rush. Children do not want to read a book written by a gasbag. Children deserve better than lies and demagoguery

Have you read the book and are you ready to point out the "lies and demagoguery" you seem certain lie within?

First, I have a degree in history (Minor Cal Poly) , second TIME TRAVEL AND A TALKING HORSE? lol

Pilgrims and Puritans are not interchangeable.


As Rush sees it,“The true story of Thanksgiving is how socialism failed.”

BZZ

Right Wing Continues to Push “Socialist Pilgrims” Myth


Despite a comprehensive repudiation by historians of the belief that the original Pilgrims were socialists who only began to succeed and prosper once they turned to capitalism, on this Thanksgiving conservative leaders and writers continue to spread the urban legend that the settlers were almost doomed by their socialist-ways.

Some background: according to real historians, the Pilgrims held their land in common “in the interest of realizing a profit sooner, and was only intended for the short term; historians say the Pilgrims were more like shareholders in an early corporation than subjects of socialism.” But the settlers, who came from different part of England, “spoke different dialects and had different methods of farming, and looked upon each other with great wariness.” Because of such difficulties, the colony scrapped the land arrangements in 1623, yet the colony held the first Thanksgiving in 1621 and the original “arrangement did not produce famine.”

But that hasn’t stopped the Right from propagating the myth that the failures of “socialism” forced them to embrace capitalism


Right Wing Continues to Push ?Socialist Pilgrims? Myth | Right Wing Watch


Leave aside the question of whether this country is on the march to socialism (conservatives say yes, and blame the Democrats). What does the record say?

Historians say that the settlers in Plymouth, and their supporters in England, did indeed agree to hold their property in common — William Bradford, the governor, referred to it in his writings as the “common course.” But the plan was in the interest of realizing a profit sooner, and was only intended for the short term; historians say the Pilgrims were more like shareholders in an early corporation than subjects of socialism.

“It was directed ultimately to private profit,” said Richard Pickering, a historian of early America and the deputy director of Plimoth Plantation, a museum devoted to keeping the Pilgrims’ story alive.

The arrangement did not produce famine. If it had, Bradford would not have declared the three days of sport and feasting in 1621 that became known as the first Thanksgiving. “The celebration would never have happened if the harvest was going to be less than enough to get them by,” Mr. Pickering said. “They would have saved it and rationed it to get by.”

The competing versions of the story note Bradford’s writings about “confusion and discontent” and accusations of “laziness” among the colonists. But Mr. Pickering said this grumbling had more to do with the fact that the Plymouth colony was bringing together settlers from all over England, at a time when most people never moved more than 10 miles from home. They spoke different dialects and had different methods of farming, and looked upon each other with great wariness.

“One man’s laziness is another man’s industry, based on the agricultural methods they’ve learned as young people,” he said.



Bradford did get rid of the common course — but it was in 1623, after the first Thanksgiving, and not because the system wasn’t working. The Pilgrims just didn’t like it. In the accounts of colonists, Mr. Pickering said, “there was griping and groaning.”

“Bachelors didn’t want to feed the wives of married men, and women don’t want to do the laundry of the bachelors,” he said.

The real reason agriculture became more profitable over the years, Mr. Pickering said, is that the Pilgrims were getting better at farming crops like corn that had been unknown to them in England.

As for Jamestown, there was famine. But historians dispute the characterization of the colony as a collectivist society. “To call it socialism is wildly inaccurate,” said Karen Ordahl Kupperman, a historian at New York University and the author of “The Jamestown Project.” “It was a contracted company, and everybody worked for the company. I mean, is Halliburton a socialist scheme?”

The widespread deaths resulted mostly from malaria. Tree ring studies suggest that the settlement was also plagued by drought.

But the biggest problem, Professor Kupperman said, was the lack of planning. The Virginia settlers came to the New World thinking that they could find gold or a route to the Pacific Ocean via the Chesapeake Bay, and make a quick buck by setting up a trading station like others were establishing in the East Indies.

“It was just wishful thinking,” she said, “a failure to recognize that these things are really, really difficult.”

The Tea Party’s take on Thanksgiving may have its roots in the cold war.


MORE

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/weekinreview/21zernike.html?pagewanted=all

You are mad Marxism failed? You call those who oppose Marxism radical?

You know history, thanks for qualifying yourself.

Oh, and thanks for the radical view from the revisionist, bravo.
 
Hate and Bigotry continues from the democrats, Democrats were and are the KKK, Democrats denied blacks the right to vote, Democrats of course call anything less than their bigotry, "radical". A fool knows not that he is a fool, the liberal bigoted Democrat can not see his own hate and ignorance.
 
I guess this is why so many self-proclaimed Conservatives don't like teachers

Can you believe this crap?

SC Teacher Used Limbaugh's Book To Teach Third Graders About Slavery

Are you cool with this? Is this OK w/you?

Excellent tool for creating future low information voters



I see the sarcasm.....
Glad to see you find low information a problem in America.


No doubt you dashed off a strongly worded letter to the Obama administration when you found out that the IRS was targeting groups that intended to teach the Constitution.....

You did, didn't you?

I'd hate to find out that you are a hypocrite........



"At various points over the past two years, Internal Revenue Service officials targeted nonprofit groups that criticized the government and sought to educate Americans about the U.S. Constitution, according to documents in an audit conducted by the agency's inspector general."
IRS targeted groups that criticized the government, IG report says - The Washington Post
 
Doesn't bother me at all.

The book leaves out the part where Rush Revere avoids fighting the British because of the Boil on his behind.

Listen my children and you shall hear
How Rush dodged the draft with a boil on his rear



You wouldn't support any draft dodger...would ya'?

And you sure wouldn't vote for one......unless you were a hypocrite.....


[Note: After the draft letter, below, there is a transcript of a February 1992 Nightline program in which then-Governor Bill Clinton discusses the controversial draft letter with Ted Koppel.]

"Dear Colonel Holmes,
I am sorry to be so long in writing. I know I promised to let you hear from me at least once a month, and from now on you will, but I have had to have some time to think about this first letter. Almost daily since my return to England I have thought about writing, about what I want to and ought to say. First, I want to thank you, not just for saving me from the draft, but for being so kind and decent to me last summer, when I was as low as I have ever been. One thing which made the bond we struck in good faith somewhat palatable to me was my high regard for you personally. In retrospect, it seems that the admiration might not have been mutual had you known a little more about me, about my political beliefs and activities. At least you might have thought me more fit for the draft than for ROTC. Let me try to explain.

From my work I came to believe that the draft system itself is illegitimate. No government really rooted in limited, parliamentary democracy should have the power to make its citizens fight and kill and die in a war they may oppose, a war which even possibly may be wrong, a war which, in any case, does not involve immediately the peace and freedom of the nation.
Because of my opposition to the draft and the war, I am in great sympathy with those who are not willing to fight, kill, and maybe die for their country, that is, the particular policy of a particular government, right or wrong.
I am writing too in the hope that my telling this one story will help you understand more clearly how so many fine people have come to find themselves loving their country but loathing the military, to which you and other good men have devoted years, lifetimes and the best service you could give. To many of us, it is no longer clear what is service and what is dis-service, or if it is clear, the conclusion is likely to be illegal.

Bill Clinton's Draft Letter | The Clinton Years | FRONTLINE | PBS




Did ya' get that part?
First, I want to thank you, not just for saving me from the draft,
 
Does the book explain how many South Carolinian conservatives Americans had to shoot to get that 'liberty' for blacks that Rush is raving about?
 
Last edited:
Does the book explain how many South Carolinian conservatives Americans had to shoot to get that 'liberty' for blacks that Rush is raving about?



I sure hope he didn't leave this out....

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…”
Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425
 
I guess this is why so many self-proclaimed Conservatives don't like teachers

Can you believe this crap?

SC Teacher Used Limbaugh's Book To Teach Third Graders About Slavery

Are you cool with this? Is this OK w/you?

Excellent tool for creating future low information voters



I see the sarcasm.....
Glad to see you find low information a problem in America.


No doubt you dashed off a strongly worded letter to the Obama administration when you found out that the IRS was targeting groups that intended to teach the Constitution.....

You did, didn't you?

I'd hate to find out that you are a hypocrite........



"At various points over the past two years, Internal Revenue Service officials targeted nonprofit groups that criticized the government and sought to educate Americans about the U.S. Constitution, according to documents in an audit conducted by the agency's inspector general."
IRS targeted groups that criticized the government, IG report says - The Washington Post

The IRS targeted TeaTards

and Teatards have no concept of the Constitution
 
I guess this is why so many self-proclaimed Conservatives don't like teachers

Can you believe this crap?

SC Teacher Used Limbaugh's Book To Teach Third Graders About Slavery

Are you cool with this? Is this OK w/you?

Excellent tool for creating future low information voters



EXACTLY...the right is in a fight against reality. The nation is becoming more multi-racial and multi-ethnic.
They need single-minded 'Limbaugh youth' to clense their communuities of unpure ways of thinking
 
Does the book explain how many South Carolinian conservatives Americans had to shoot to get that 'liberty' for blacks that Rush is raving about?



I sure hope he didn't leave this out....

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…”
Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

If you think you can convince us that Nathan Bedford Forrest was a liberal,

by all means, entertain us.
 
I guess this is why so many self-proclaimed Conservatives don't like teachers

Can you believe this crap?

SC Teacher Used Limbaugh's Book To Teach Third Graders About Slavery

Are you cool with this? Is this OK w/you?



I just looked it up on Amazon.....3,931 reviews...


...every single one was favorable.





How ya' like that, boyyyyyeeeeeee???

Like this one?

Rush Revere and the First Patriots: Time-Travel Adventures With Exceptional Americans (Kindle Edition)

Not educational, informative, or even entertaining. If you like history taught by hateful people who get pleasure out of inciting and demeaning this may be the book for you; but true Americans know to stay away.


http://www.amazon.com/Rush-Revere-F...rtBy=bySubmissionDateDescending&tag=ff0d01-20
 
It doesn't look like the teacher mentioned slavery. Maybe the ever vigilant Media Matters folks added the word "slavery" to give the story a racial flavor so that lefties keep that hatred edge they like so well.
 
Are the brave new world movers on the radical left going to start burning books now? I think the best temperature is "Fahrenheit 451". Will the reference to the roaring twenties, "The Great Gatsby" be banned in schools because you don't like F. Scott Fitzgerald's politics? Maybe the Dept of Education should have arson squads to weed out those pesky history books that don't conform to liberal thinking.
 
The book in Question is not about Slavery, but it does state in one sentence at the end,

Slavery is Evil

With Rush Limbaugh making the statement that Slavery is Evil, I can understand why the Democrats, Liberals, and Independents are upset, imagine calling Slavery Evil, when so many Democrats, Liberals, and Independents are Bigots and wish for the return of Slavery.

The Radical Right Wing can not call a Democratic Institution such as Slavery evil, it makes the Liberals look bad.
 
He got it right... slavery was evil and those who owned slaves were cowardly in the least. Not one to be proud of.
 

Forum List

Back
Top