Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

Wrong yet again you stupid coward. Your own words were if Pelosi not allow the Senate to proceed. She can’t stop them dumbass. You are an uneducated illiterate, backpedaling, lying COWARD. But the way idiot, the Dims OWN WITNESS stated that until Pisslosi actually grows a set and sends her losing case to the senate, Trump is NOT impeached as the process is NOT completed yet. Seems YOU need to learn how to read dumbfuck. You lose again.
LOL

By "unhingeness," that's ^^^exactly what I'm talkin' about.

Viva Nancy!

:abgg2q.jpg:

I’ll type slowly so that even an illiterate little yellow coward like, you with no brain cells might understand. The process has NOT been completed moron. Thus you have no impeachment per the Dims OWN WITNESS. Quoting the same one guy over and over doesn’t change that. You’ve been getting your ass kicked all over this thread you brain dead moron. But keep spinning and lying. Just proving the fact that you are uneducated as we’ll as a stark COWARD. Denying your own words. You are the unhinged one. Enjoy 5 more years of Trump.
LOLOLOL

Poor, deranged rightard. What part of "sole power" are you incapable of understanding?

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Impeachment is what the House says it is -- and the House says Trump is impeached. That's never going away. Not ever.

:dance:

You just keep showing yourself to be an illiterate fuckwad. The process is NOT COMPLETE you idiot. The House can say whatever they want and drooling idiots like you lick it up. Until this is sent to the Senate, legally they have done NOTHING. But brain dead little yellow cowards like you can’t seem to grasp that simple concept. Your idiotic oversize emojis to compensate for something just make you look even more stupid.
 
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
You left out this part from your article...

Sure, it’s a stupid question

And here's the answer to that stupid question...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

In case that's beyond your reading comprehension capabilities, lemme break it down real simple for ya...

Impeachment is what the House says it is. And at 20:52 EST on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019, the House said Trump is impeached.
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
Nope. Not yet, Chowderhead.
Yup, yet. You already said you trust the opinion of Harvard Law professors and I've now quoted two of them saying he was impeached on December 18th and remains impeached.

:dance:
Not until the paperwork has been filed with the Senate
Doesn't Nancy care that Trump is destroying America. WE MUST IMPEACH
 
Good luck with that as long as the Senate doesn't get the articles the President is not impeached lol
LOL

Well there's your brain-dead opinion ... and then there's the Constitution. And according to the Constitution, he's impeached. So I'll go with the Constitution on this one.

:dance:
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
You left out this part from your article...

Sure, it’s a stupid question

And here's the answer to that stupid question...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

In case that's beyond your reading comprehension capabilities, lemme break it down real simple for ya...

Impeachment is what the House says it is. And at 20:52 EST on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019, the House said Trump is impeached.
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
OH but it does matter.
 
Wrong yet again you stupid coward. Your own words were if Pelosi not allow the Senate to proceed. She can’t stop them dumbass. You are an uneducated illiterate, backpedaling, lying COWARD. But the way idiot, the Dims OWN WITNESS stated that until Pisslosi actually grows a set and sends her losing case to the senate, Trump is NOT impeached as the process is NOT completed yet. Seems YOU need to learn how to read dumbfuck. You lose again.
LOL

By "unhingeness," that's ^^^exactly what I'm talkin' about.

Viva Nancy!

:abgg2q.jpg:

I’ll type slowly so that even an illiterate little yellow coward like, you with no brain cells might understand. The process has NOT been completed moron. Thus you have no impeachment per the Dims OWN WITNESS. Quoting the same one guy over and over doesn’t change that. You’ve been getting your ass kicked all over this thread you brain dead moron. But keep spinning and lying. Just proving the fact that you are uneducated as we’ll as a stark COWARD. Denying your own words. You are the unhinged one. Enjoy 5 more years of Trump.
LOLOLOL

Poor, deranged rightard. What part of "sole power" are you incapable of understanding?

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Impeachment is what the House says it is -- and the House says Trump is impeached. That's never going away. Not ever.

:dance:

You just keep showing yourself to be an illiterate fuckwad. The process is NOT COMPLETE you idiot. The House can say whatever they want and drooling idiots like you lick it up. Until this is sent to the Senate, legally they have done NOTHING. But brain dead little yellow cowards like you can’t seem to grasp that simple concept. Your idiotic oversize emojis to compensate for something just make you look even more stupid.
You dildo, you keep saying that but you can't prove it.

And of course, impeachment is what the House says it is, as authorized by the Constitution.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.
 
You left out this part from your article...

Sure, it’s a stupid question

And here's the answer to that stupid question...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

In case that's beyond your reading comprehension capabilities, lemme break it down real simple for ya...

Impeachment is what the House says it is. And at 20:52 EST on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019, the House said Trump is impeached.
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
Nope. Not yet, Chowderhead.
Yup, yet. You already said you trust the opinion of Harvard Law professors and I've now quoted two of them saying he was impeached on December 18th and remains impeached.

:dance:
Not until the paperwork has been filed with the Senate
Doesn't Nancy care that Trump is destroying America. WE MUST IMPEACH
LOL

What a shame you can't prove your delusions are real. :mm:
 
LOL

Well there's your brain-dead opinion ... and then there's the Constitution. And according to the Constitution, he's impeached. So I'll go with the Constitution on this one.

:dance:
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
You left out this part from your article...

Sure, it’s a stupid question

And here's the answer to that stupid question...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

In case that's beyond your reading comprehension capabilities, lemme break it down real simple for ya...

Impeachment is what the House says it is. And at 20:52 EST on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019, the House said Trump is impeached.
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
OH but it does matter.
LOLOL

Slobbers a PussyBitch who can't prove what he says. :lmao:
 
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
You left out this part from your article...

Sure, it’s a stupid question

And here's the answer to that stupid question...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

In case that's beyond your reading comprehension capabilities, lemme break it down real simple for ya...

Impeachment is what the House says it is. And at 20:52 EST on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019, the House said Trump is impeached.
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
OH but it does matter.
LOLOL

Slobbers a PussyBitch who can't prove what he says. :lmao:
if your tampon stuck in too deep?
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
 
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
Nope. Not yet, Chowderhead.
Yup, yet. You already said you trust the opinion of Harvard Law professors and I've now quoted two of them saying he was impeached on December 18th and remains impeached.

:dance:
Not until the paperwork has been filed with the Senate
Doesn't Nancy care that Trump is destroying America. WE MUST IMPEACH
LOL

What a shame you can't prove your delusions are real. :mm:
Your inability to comprehend is not my fault
 
It is ILLEGAL to abuse your public office to exchange American foreign policy for personal gain (quid-pro-quo).
Good thing Trump didn't do this.
It is LEGAL for Congress to not send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate.
If Trump has been impeached, the Senate is constitutionally required to hold a trial.
The house has no constitutional authority to inhibit this, and the house has no constitutionally mandated role in said trial.
If Trump has NOT been impeached... well, the Democrats, their accomplices in the MSM and all the liberals on this board - including you - have been lying to everyone.

Which is it?
 
If Trump has been impeached, the Senate is constitutionally required to hold a trial.
The house has no constitutional authority to inhibit this, and the house has no constitutionally mandated role in said trial.
If Trump has NOT been impeached... well, the Democrats, their accomplices in the MSM and all the liberals on this board - including you - have been lying to everyone.

Which is it?

Who gives a shit?

You want to say Turmp was not impeached for a few weeks longer? Ok say it, but you know damn well it's just a matter of time before an arrangement between the House and the Senate is reached.

This conversation is moot.
 
Wrong yet again you stupid coward. Your own words were if Pelosi not allow the Senate to proceed. She can’t stop them dumbass. You are an uneducated illiterate, backpedaling, lying COWARD. But the way idiot, the Dims OWN WITNESS stated that until Pisslosi actually grows a set and sends her losing case to the senate, Trump is NOT impeached as the process is NOT completed yet. Seems YOU need to learn how to read dumbfuck. You lose again.
LOL

By "unhingeness," that's ^^^exactly what I'm talkin' about.

Viva Nancy!

:abgg2q.jpg:

I’ll type slowly so that even an illiterate little yellow coward like, you with no brain cells might understand. The process has NOT been completed moron. Thus you have no impeachment per the Dims OWN WITNESS. Quoting the same one guy over and over doesn’t change that. You’ve been getting your ass kicked all over this thread you brain dead moron. But keep spinning and lying. Just proving the fact that you are uneducated as we’ll as a stark COWARD. Denying your own words. You are the unhinged one. Enjoy 5 more years of Trump.
LOLOLOL

Poor, deranged rightard. What part of "sole power" are you incapable of understanding?

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Impeachment is what the House says it is -- and the House says Trump is impeached. That's never going away. Not ever.

:dance:

You just keep showing yourself to be an illiterate fuckwad. The process is NOT COMPLETE you idiot. The House can say whatever they want and drooling idiots like you lick it up. Until this is sent to the Senate, legally they have done NOTHING. But brain dead little yellow cowards like you can’t seem to grasp that simple concept. Your idiotic oversize emojis to compensate for something just make you look even more stupid.
You dildo, you keep saying that but you can't prove it.

And of course, impeachment is what the House says it is, as authorized by the Constitution.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Can’t prove it? You truly are an uneducated dipshit. Has Pisslosi sent the articles to the Senate? NO! Thus the process is NOT completed you illiterate hack. Seems intelligent people can see that. Of course you’re nothing but a little yellow coward so you can’t see that. Although the Dims own expert on impeachment says it hasn’t happened yet. A party of cowards perfectly describes you and your Dim masters. Idiot.:fu:
 
If Trump has been impeached, the Senate is constitutionally required to hold a trial.
The house has no constitutional authority to inhibit this, and the house has no constitutionally mandated role in said trial.
If Trump has NOT been impeached... well, the Democrats, their accomplices in the MSM and all the liberals on this board - including you - have been lying to everyone.
Which is it?
Who gives a shit?
Anyone who says "It is LEGAL for Congress to not send Articles of Impeachment to the Senate."
So... which is it?
 
You think they’re standing up for the rule of law?

They’re covering for Trump. Nothing more.
No, they aren't

Then why is McConnell refusing to allow any witnesses?

Because it was Schiff and Nadler who were supposed to call them. Why did Schiff refuse to call the whistle blower?

Schiff and Nadler cannot call witnesses in the trial.

There was no purpose to call the whistleblower other than intimidation and diversion.

What do you mean there was no purpose in calling the whistleblower? He/she is the one who made the accusation. They should be questioned and cross-examined. That is obvious.
Remember, these are the same people that were the appeasers of the USSR and proudly walk around with "Che" the mass murderer T shirts. In their world, if you aren't a Democrat or radical Leftwinger, it's guilty until proven innocent.
 
You left out this part from your article...

Sure, it’s a stupid question

And here's the answer to that stupid question...

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

In case that's beyond your reading comprehension capabilities, lemme break it down real simple for ya...

Impeachment is what the House says it is. And at 20:52 EST on Wednesday, December 18th, 2019, the House said Trump is impeached.
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
OH but it does matter.
LOLOL

Slobbers a PussyBitch who can't prove what he says. :lmao:
if your tampon stuck in too deep?
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
LOLOL

PussyBitch, did you even bother to read your own link? It asks Impeached Trump was really impeached.... never answers it's own question... and ends by pointing out, "sure, it’s a stupid question."

You fail again because you're a failure.

:dance:
 
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
Nope. Not yet, Chowderhead.
Yup, yet. You already said you trust the opinion of Harvard Law professors and I've now quoted two of them saying he was impeached on December 18th and remains impeached.

:dance:
Not until the paperwork has been filed with the Senate
Doesn't Nancy care that Trump is destroying America. WE MUST IMPEACH
LOL

What a shame you can't prove your delusions are real. :mm:
Your inability to comprehend is not my fault
LOLOL

PussyBitch be like, nuh-uh!
 
LOL

By "unhingeness," that's ^^^exactly what I'm talkin' about.

Viva Nancy!

:abgg2q.jpg:

I’ll type slowly so that even an illiterate little yellow coward like, you with no brain cells might understand. The process has NOT been completed moron. Thus you have no impeachment per the Dims OWN WITNESS. Quoting the same one guy over and over doesn’t change that. You’ve been getting your ass kicked all over this thread you brain dead moron. But keep spinning and lying. Just proving the fact that you are uneducated as we’ll as a stark COWARD. Denying your own words. You are the unhinged one. Enjoy 5 more years of Trump.
LOLOLOL

Poor, deranged rightard. What part of "sole power" are you incapable of understanding?

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Impeachment is what the House says it is -- and the House says Trump is impeached. That's never going away. Not ever.

:dance:

You just keep showing yourself to be an illiterate fuckwad. The process is NOT COMPLETE you idiot. The House can say whatever they want and drooling idiots like you lick it up. Until this is sent to the Senate, legally they have done NOTHING. But brain dead little yellow cowards like you can’t seem to grasp that simple concept. Your idiotic oversize emojis to compensate for something just make you look even more stupid.
You dildo, you keep saying that but you can't prove it.

And of course, impeachment is what the House says it is, as authorized by the Constitution.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Can’t prove it? You truly are an uneducated dipshit. Has Pisslosi sent the articles to the Senate? NO! Thus the process is NOT completed you illiterate hack. Seems intelligent people can see that. Of course you’re nothing but a little yellow coward so you can’t see that. Although the Dims own expert on impeachment says it hasn’t happened yet. A party of cowards perfectly describes you and your Dim masters. Idiot.:fu:
Dumbfuck, I already proved it. I showed you the Constitution states impeachment is what the House says it is.

You shaking your walker at the sky and ranting, nuh-uh, is a failing position, yet it's all you have.

:dance:
 
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass.
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
OH but it does matter.
LOLOL

Slobbers a PussyBitch who can't prove what he says. :lmao:
if your tampon stuck in too deep?
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
LOLOL

PussyBitch, did you even bother to read your own link? It asks Impeached Trump was really impeached.... never answers it's own question... and ends by pointing out, "sure, it’s a stupid question."

You fail again because you're a failure.

:dance:
yep you have your tampon into deep
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
 
Nope. Not yet, Chowderhead.
Yup, yet. You already said you trust the opinion of Harvard Law professors and I've now quoted two of them saying he was impeached on December 18th and remains impeached.

:dance:
Not until the paperwork has been filed with the Senate
Doesn't Nancy care that Trump is destroying America. WE MUST IMPEACH
LOL

What a shame you can't prove your delusions are real. :mm:
Your inability to comprehend is not my fault
LOLOL

PussyBitch be like, nuh-uh!
Beta males like to project
When an Alpha Male comes around Beta males piss their pants
 
Last edited:
I’ll type slowly so that even an illiterate little yellow coward like, you with no brain cells might understand. The process has NOT been completed moron. Thus you have no impeachment per the Dims OWN WITNESS. Quoting the same one guy over and over doesn’t change that. You’ve been getting your ass kicked all over this thread you brain dead moron. But keep spinning and lying. Just proving the fact that you are uneducated as we’ll as a stark COWARD. Denying your own words. You are the unhinged one. Enjoy 5 more years of Trump.
LOLOLOL

Poor, deranged rightard. What part of "sole power" are you incapable of understanding?

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Impeachment is what the House says it is -- and the House says Trump is impeached. That's never going away. Not ever.

:dance:

You just keep showing yourself to be an illiterate fuckwad. The process is NOT COMPLETE you idiot. The House can say whatever they want and drooling idiots like you lick it up. Until this is sent to the Senate, legally they have done NOTHING. But brain dead little yellow cowards like you can’t seem to grasp that simple concept. Your idiotic oversize emojis to compensate for something just make you look even more stupid.
You dildo, you keep saying that but you can't prove it.

And of course, impeachment is what the House says it is, as authorized by the Constitution.

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Can’t prove it? You truly are an uneducated dipshit. Has Pisslosi sent the articles to the Senate? NO! Thus the process is NOT completed you illiterate hack. Seems intelligent people can see that. Of course you’re nothing but a little yellow coward so you can’t see that. Although the Dims own expert on impeachment says it hasn’t happened yet. A party of cowards perfectly describes you and your Dim masters. Idiot.:fu:
Dumbfuck, I already proved it. I showed you the Constitution states impeachment is what the House says it is.

You shaking your walker at the sky and ranting, nuh-uh, is a failing position, yet it's all you have.

:dance:
beta male pissing your pants doesn't mean you proved anything.
 
It matters not if these articles pass or not in terms of Impeached Trump is already Impeached and will remain so.
OH but it does matter.
LOLOL

Slobbers a PussyBitch who can't prove what he says. :lmao:
if your tampon stuck in too deep?
until the senate gets the articles of impeachment the president is not impeached.
In the law, there are many situations in which an outcome is known, but it is not a formal outcome until some ministerial act is taken. A grand jury can vote an indictment, for example, but the defendant is not considered indicted until the charges are filed with the clerk of the court. A defendant can be found guilty by a jury, but there is technically no conviction until the judgment is “entered” by the trial court, usually months later when sentence is imposed. An appellate court can issue a ruling that orders a lower court to take some action, but the lower court has no jurisdiction to act in the case until issuance of the appellate court’s “mandate” — the document that formally transfers jurisdiction.

Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Trump Impeachment: If Impeachment Articles Are Not Delivered, Did Impeachment Happen? | National Review
LOLOL

PussyBitch, did you even bother to read your own link? It asks Impeached Trump was really impeached.... never answers it's own question... and ends by pointing out, "sure, it’s a stupid question."

You fail again because you're a failure.

:dance:
yep you have your tampon into deep
Plainly, Congress has similar ministerial acts of transference that must occur in order for legislation to pass. Were that not the case, Speaker Pelosi would not be talking about delaying the transfer of impeachment articles.
Poor PussyBitch, too stupid to understand the Constitution grants the House the sole power of impeachment AND the House rules dictate a president is impeached by the adoption of House Articles of Impeachment...

EMQX45bXUAUipL_.png

You lose again because because you're a loser.

:dance:
 

Forum List

Back
Top