Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[Faun]

He sure can. As a private lawyer working on behalf of the private client, Donald Trump.

I thought you said this was about enforcing laws? Seems like it’s more of a private matter, which is exactly what I’ve been saying.

Trump can have rudi investigate wrongdoing bt US government officials in a foreign country

Particularly when he does not trust the Deep State within the DOJ

Not into a political rival running for the same office as himself, he can't.

Yes he can

No, he can't. That violates the law.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

Rudi's work does not constitute a foreign donation, moron.

It's soliciting a foreign contribution of something of vslue.

Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

Ever??

 

[Faun]

Rudy can’t enforce the law. He can’t indict or prosecute. Not without being approved by the Senate. He has no authority. No force of government behind him. And most importantly, he has no accountability. The government cannot launch investigations without cause. Investigating without cause is violating civil rights. If Rudy were acting on behalf of the government, he would have to follow the rules.

He’s not.

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

Hollow? How is laundering $1,000,000 annually to his family hollow? And that's just from one Ukrainian Board

You have zero proof money was laundered.

 

[colfax_m]

Rudy can’t enforce the law. He can’t indict or prosecute. Not without being approved by the Senate. He has no authority. No force of government behind him. And most importantly, he has no accountability. The government cannot launch investigations without cause. Investigating without cause is violating civil rights. If Rudy were acting on behalf of the government, he would have to follow the rules.

He’s not.

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

Hollow? How is laundering $1,000,000 annually to his family hollow? And that's just from one Ukrainian Board

I heard he laundered a trillion dollars and was involved in the Bowling Green massacre.

 

[Mac-7]

I do claim its about law enforcement

Rudy can’t enforce the law. He can’t indict or prosecute. Not without being approved by the Senate. He has no authority. No force of government behind him. And most importantly, he has no accountability. The government cannot launch investigations without cause. Investigating without cause is violating civil rights. If Rudy were acting on behalf of the government, he would have to follow the rules.

He’s not.

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

they accusations of wrongdoing

thats how all criminal prosecutions begin

 

[colfax_m]

You're ineducable, huh? No, Trump is not the chief law enforcement officer and while he can appoint or fire the Attorney General, he can't force them to investigate whomever he wants. He can ask them and they might but they are not obliged to do so.

True

Trump cant force anyone to do anything

No one has that authority except God

And even He chooses to allow us free will

But trump has responsibility for enforcing the laws

"True"

Then why do you continue to falsely assert that?

Because trump is the ultimate law enforcer

Which is why he has a Department of Justice, which is why the head of that department is the chief law enforcement officer. Since you claim to know this, who knows why you repeat your nonsense that Trump is the "top cop" or "chief law enforcement officer?"

Trump is ghe highest ranking enforcer of the law

Then he’s a dirty cop.

 

[colfax_m]

Rudy can’t enforce the law. He can’t indict or prosecute. Not without being approved by the Senate. He has no authority. No force of government behind him. And most importantly, he has no accountability. The government cannot launch investigations without cause. Investigating without cause is violating civil rights. If Rudy were acting on behalf of the government, he would have to follow the rules.

He’s not.

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

they accusations of wrongdoing

thats how all criminal prosecutions begin

The accusations need to be credible. You don’t get to make up accusations as a false pretense.

 

[Faun]

You're ineducable, huh? No, Trump is not the chief law enforcement officer and while he can appoint or fire the Attorney General, he can't force them to investigate whomever he wants. He can ask them and they might but they are not obliged to do so.

True

Trump cant force anyone to do anything

No one has that authority except God

And even He chooses to allow us free will

But trump has responsibility for enforcing the laws

"True"

Then why do you continue to falsely assert that?

Because trump is the ultimate law enforcer

Which is why he has a Department of Justice, which is why the head of that department is the chief law enforcement officer. Since you claim to know this, who knows why you repeat your nonsense that Trump is the "top cop" or "chief law enforcement officer?"

Trump is ghe highest ranking enforcer of the law

LOL

So despite agreeing with me, you still think Trump is the chief law enforcement officer?

 

[Mac-7]

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

they accusations of wrongdoing

thats how all criminal prosecutions begin

The accusations need to be credible. You don’t get to make up accusations as a false pretense.

I consider the accusations against biden to be credible

 

[Mac-7]

True

Trump cant force anyone to do anything

No one has that authority except God

And even He chooses to allow us free will

But trump has responsibility for enforcing the laws

"True"

Then why do you continue to falsely assert that?

Because trump is the ultimate law enforcer

Which is why he has a Department of Justice, which is why the head of that department is the chief law enforcement officer. Since you claim to know this, who knows why you repeat your nonsense that Trump is the "top cop" or "chief law enforcement officer?"

Trump is ghe highest ranking enforcer of the law

LOL

So despite agreeing with me, you still think Trump is the chief law enforcement officer?

The ultimate responsibility is Trump’s

 

[Faun]

He sure can. As a private lawyer working on behalf of the private client, Donald Trump.

I thought you said this was about enforcing laws? Seems like it’s more of a private matter, which is exactly what I’ve been saying.

Trump can have rudi investigate wrongdoing bt US government officials in a foreign country

Particularly when he does not trust the Deep State within the DOJ

Not into a political rival running for the same office as himself, he can't.

Yes he can

No, he can't. That violates the law.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

None of that applies to trump

Of course it does.

He asked a foreign national to investigate a political rival who's also campaigning for the office of president. An investigation is something of value that benefits his campaign.

 

[colfax_m]

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

they accusations of wrongdoing

thats how all criminal prosecutions begin

The accusations need to be credible. You don’t get to make up accusations as a false pretense.

I consider the accusations against biden to be credible

Of course you do, but the standard isn’t whether you find the accusations credible.

 

[Mac-7]

Trump can have rudi investigate wrongdoing bt US government officials in a foreign country

Particularly when he does not trust the Deep State within the DOJ

Not into a political rival running for the same office as himself, he can't.

Yes he can

No, he can't. That violates the law.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

None of that applies to trump

Of course it does.

He asked a foreign national to investigate a political rival who's also campaigning for the office of president. An investigation is something of value that benefits his campaign.

You have summed up the democrst complaint

but I and most other people do not accept that claim

 

[Faun]

Rudy can’t enforce the law. He can’t indict or prosecute. Not without being approved by the Senate. He has no authority. No force of government behind him. And most importantly, he has no accountability. The government cannot launch investigations without cause. Investigating without cause is violating civil rights. If Rudy were acting on behalf of the government, he would have to follow the rules.

He’s not.

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

they accusations of wrongdoing

thats how all criminal prosecutions begin

A president cannot violate one law to enforce another.

 

[easyt65]

Why would any rational observer need to hear from witnesses whose written complaint is comprehensive, detailed, and has been fully corroborated by documents and individuals with first-hand knowledge?

You are either a moron or a f*ing liar - which is it?

1. The non-qualifying whistle blower admittedly has ZERO 1st hand knowledge of the debunked accusations in their complaint.

2. The prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ REJECTED the complaint because NO CRIME was proven to have been committed, & there were NO WITNESSESS.

In Schiff's coup circus hearings EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO TESTIFIED ADMITTED THEY PERSONALLY WITNESSED NOTHING ... and when asked directly to name the crime the President committed THEY COULD NOT DO IT.

In the end, they proved themselves to be MORONS like YOU, just parroting and repeating debunked BS and hearsay they had heard.

.

 

[Faun]

"True"

Then why do you continue to falsely assert that?

Because trump is the ultimate law enforcer

Which is why he has a Department of Justice, which is why the head of that department is the chief law enforcement officer. Since you claim to know this, who knows why you repeat your nonsense that Trump is the "top cop" or "chief law enforcement officer?"

Trump is ghe highest ranking enforcer of the law

LOL

So despite agreeing with me, you still think Trump is the chief law enforcement officer?

The ultimate responsibility is Trump’s

Again, that's why he has a DoJ. They are the ones actually enforcing the law. You don't see a president indicting anyone, do you?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.

LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

No they didn’t.

Yes they did, and YOU know it, just read the online transcripts and you can see EVERY lying Republiscum had the exact same time to question each witness as the Dems.

Like I said when the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Dems interviewing gov officials in a closet is not exactly a fair process.
Hillary lost, get over it or move to your NewSSR.

The Republiscum were in the same "closet" interviewing the same witnesses so it was more than fair.

No, they weren’t.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.

LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

No they didn’t.

Yes they did, and YOU know it, just read the online transcripts and you can see EVERY lying Republiscum had the exact same time to question each witness as the Dems.

Like I said when the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Dems interviewing gov officials in a closet is not exactly a fair process.
Hillary lost, get over it or move to your NewSSR.

Were Republicans in that closet as well?

No.

 

[Faun]

Not into a political rival running for the same office as himself, he can't.

Yes he can

No, he can't. That violates the law.

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or​

(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.​

None of that applies to trump

Of course it does.

He asked a foreign national to investigate a political rival who's also campaigning for the office of president. An investigation is something of value that benefits his campaign.

You have summed up the democrst complaint

but I and most other people do not accept that claim

How is a president soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival not violating that law?

 

[Siete]

Now you are repeating yourself

Rudy can investigate criminal activity

For what purpose other than to benefit his client?

To serve justice

Biden is dirty and all for the sake of providing for his deadbeat son

Your hollow claims that Biden is dirty are unproven.

And even if he was, that doesn't give a private attorney the legal authority to subvert the law to solicit a foreign leader to investigate his client's political rivals.

they accusations of wrongdoing

thats how all criminal prosecutions begin

A president cannot violate one law to enforce another.

trump can - then keep obstruction of congress tied up in the courts for months on end.

 

[busybee01]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

Well, aren't you the one to judge what is pertinent and what isn't.
The whistleblower and Schiff were very germane to the case, no matter what your
Cracker Jack box law degree tells you.
idiot

I am a better judge than you as I did not vote for either Trump or Clinton.
The whistleblower was not needed and Schiff is not germane. You don't need a law degree to see that.

Yes, the whistleblower was needed along with the 6 other people the whistleblower had talked with.
Schiff is needed to answer for what he knew and when did he know about the whistleblower.

Wrong. The whistleblower was not needed and none of the witnesses are germane with the exception of the 2 witnesses who testified..