Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Universe obviously exists and so does life. Scientists have not been able to replicate anything of the sort. So the burden of proof lies with those who say that everything is the result of a natural occurrence...Sure, just as soon as you show me a magical sky daddy creating something.You mean, you need a creator. Try to distinguish between your own fetishes and the rest of reality.The discovery of life elsewhere in our solar system or elsewhere in our galaxy would be utterly devastating to the religious articles as “creation” is uniquely an earthly event.
Not really. The universe may very well be teeming with life. All of it still needs a creator.
Feel free to show me something in the universe that is capable of causing itself to come into existence.
And you are making the same error you religious folks always make. youare the only one claiming with any certainty to know how everything came into existence. The burden of proof lies with you.
Shameless lie. Surely you don't think you are fooling anyone with this embarrassing lie. And scientific theories are more than "just words"...that's why you young earth charlatans can squawk and cry and dance and prance all day, and not one of you can put a dent in any of them.Words are cheap and the evidence has been demonstrated to go both ways.
So you say --- more words. Scientific fact is observable and repeatable. Theory is not fact and that is your weakest link.Shameless lie. Surely you don't think you are fooling anyone with this embarrassing lie. And scientific theories are more than "just words"...that's why you young earth charlatans can squawk and cry and dance and prance all day, and not one of you can put a dent in any of them.Words are cheap and the evidence has been demonstrated to go both ways.
And you are making the same error you religious folks always make. youare the only one claiming with any certainty to know how everything came into existence. The burden of proof lies with you.
See, this is what I am talking about. You don't even realize how dumb and wrong this is.Scientific fact is observable and repeatable. Theory is not fact and that is your weakest link.
Well, that's for sure. One only needs a few dubious premises to argue that conclusion. That's the thing about logic: it's just a tool. With dubious premises, you can conclude ANYTHING.t's not necessary for one to be an astrophysicist to come to the logical conclusion that a power outside of our universe had to have created said universe.
And there is the dubious premise. You don't actually know the truth of this. You just assert it as true.Nothing in this universe can cause itself to come into existence.
So what? They also cannot replicate star formation, or a volcano, or a particle in place and time. They also cannot replicate a planet's iron core, or a comet. That doesn't mean they can't find other ways of understanding them.The Universe obviously exists and so does life. Scientists have not been able to replicate anything of the sort.
Another dubious premise. I say it isn't. And the fact that you can't rule my position out to any degree whatsoever using the alleged "evidence" shows us this is actually not "evidence" at all.Existence is the evidence for a creator, along with the universe and our lives.
It's ok. God promised he wouldn't wipe out Mankind again with water.Tou should do your homework science denier. Do you think the intent of that video, or the article was to prove the flood?If you're so gullible as to believe a silly youtube video, utterly unsupported, that's your choice. Just don't presume to foist your gullibility on others
Most idiots/tards think the flood was caused solely by 40 days of rain, but the truth is, GOD says he "opened the fountains of the deep."
The existence of this great body of water is FACT. Deny all you want, denier.
Rare Diamond Confirms That Earth's Mantle Holds an Ocean's Worth of Water
There’s as much water in Earth’s mantle as in all the oceans
Found! Hidden Ocean Locked Up Deep in Earth's Mantle
You're scaring them....
Jo
So did plenty of atheists.But He did warn us that we will almost wipe ourselves out with fire and Our own inhumanity.
It is true. Europa and Enceladus are both completely covered by a layer of water than then a layer of ice. Check it out on Wiki before you make a fool of yourself.There are two moons in our solar system that are covered with water.
What you said isn't true. Moreover, can you tell the difference between a planet and a moon?
I don't expect an answer because you're a
Nope.The discovery of life elsewhere in our solar system or elsewhere in our galaxy would be utterly devastating to the religious articles as “creation” is uniquely an earthly event.
Not really. The universe may very well be teeming with life. All of it still needs a creator.
Who says that?So the burden of proof lies with those who say that everything is the result of a natural occurrence...
What would you consider "real observable proof?"I'm sorry, but why do you waste everyone's time? You offer no real observable proof. You have no interest in seeking GOD. You have no real questions only digs and insults. Just let people alone. It is obvious that you only know half a story and not the important half at that. If you are not interested in finding GOD, please don't hamper those who are.None of that is actually evidence. You have been lied to again by another paid liar.How do you know there is no other planet like Earth? Obviously you don't.
smh. We've been over this. It's in Genesis and Noah's flood. That's why there is no other planet like Earth. Our probes have found it so. Scientifically, we have the fine tuning facts to show that it does not happen. Life is rare. We can use probabilities to see if we'll find another planet like ours and chances of that are slim and none.
Such conclusions are rather premature. The scientific exploration of space is really a very young science. Radio telescopes and the Hubble are relatively new technologies within the last several decades.
Nothing about the universe shows fine tuning, unless you want to represent cometary bombardment of planets, meteor strikes (have you heard of that little dalliance on this planet that occured 65 million years age), cosmic radiation, galaxy collisions, etc., fine tuning. The fact is, space is a hostile environment to life.
The discovery of life elsewhere in our solar system or elsewhere in our galaxy would be utterly devastating to the religious articles as “creation” is uniquely an earthly event. Send a probe to Mars, scan the universe with Hubble, explore space with radio telescopes and search for life off the planet Earth. This is what science is doing. What religionists are doing to establish their suppositions... well, forgive the irony, but, god only knows.
This is science that is observable, testable and falsifiable because it is based on fine tuning facts and probabilities. I am predicting what we will not find in the future based on probabilities and what fine tuning parameters have to be met. Let's just say that you do not understand what the Earth is comprised of and probabilities. As for the rest, you believe in bull puckey, so that isn't my problem. We have not observed life anywhere else nor evidence of what you claim on Earth. Earth is special. It isn't mediocre. If it was mediocre in terms of habitability, then I would not say it. However, the secular, i.e. atheist scientists, say that because the creation scientists say the Earth is special. They are in denial of God and his beautiful, wonderful and SPECIAL creation.
The following is from theistic evos. At least, they understand science if not how God does things. It talks about Carl Sagan who died with the knowledge of no aliens and that he was wrong. I predict that most of the non-believers will die the same way.
The Universe: Evidence for Its Fine Tuning
I love the smell of tautology in the morning, it smells like....Breezewood.Existence is the evidence for a creator, along with the universe and our lives.
I do, for one.Who says that?So the burden of proof lies with those who say that everything is the result of a natural occurrence...
Absolutely. One merely has to invent an entity.It's not necessary for one to be an astrophysicist to come to the logical conclusion that a power outside of our universe had to have created said universe.
On what evidence?I do, for one.
