Science Proves the Bible Again

[progressive hunter]

"POPULATONS" of cats remain "populations" of cats. Populations" of dogs remain "populations of dogs. "Populations" of fruit flies remain "populations" of fruit flies. No one here is speaking of an individual creature evolving into another species. I do get what you are saying. The FACT is that no scientist working with any given species "population," has ever developed anything other than variations of the SAME "population." So, evolutionists have never (through "breeding" with any intent of developing a NEW species) have ever been able to demonstrate that such is feasible. Ending up with big breeds, small breeds, thin breeds, fat breeds, deformed breeds, different color breeds, doesn't prove your case at all. All it proves that there exists variable WITH each species populations which can shift but have limitations within KINDS that are insurmountable.

I can understand how evolutionists were able to hijack education by looking down their noses at anyone willing to disagree. It insults their high opinion of themselves and their place within the general "POPULATION."

I can understand as a religionist you can't accept biological evolution.

As to evolutionists hijacking education, I can understand that conspiracy theories are a convenient escape. You are free to reject science as one, vast, global conspiracy.

Your use of the slogan "kinds" is right out of the various fundamentalist creation ministries. Using such slogans makes you an accomplice to fraud and ignorance which is exactly what fundamentalist ministries press.

Observed Instances of Speciation

Some More Observed Speciation Events

CB910: New species

The above links, while they might offend your delicate religious sensibilites, address the "kinds" nonsense you find presented by the charlatans at any of the christian fundamentalist ministries.

this guy spent to much time at the beach to come up with that

Displaying your stupidity on a public message board.

Nicely done.

lifes a beach

 

[LittleNipper]

POPULATONS" of cats remain "populations" of cats. Populations" of dogs remain "populations of dogs. "Populations" of fruit flies remain "populations" of fruit flies.

all 100% wrong. You just failed a 7th grade science test.

Oh yes! I'm 100% totally wrong. I fail the course because you only want taught what you believe 100%. You don't need to prove anything through experimentation and you sure don't want anyone questioning YOUR position. It's funny --- even I can see that not everything you say is in error. However, you demonstrate why Creationists have been slowly excluded from many scientific institutions. You are an elitist, a control freak, a science Nazi and you stifle freethinking, real investigation, and believe you are 100% correct!

 

[LittleNipper]

"POPULATONS" of cats remain "populations" of cats. Populations" of dogs remain "populations of dogs. "Populations" of fruit flies remain "populations" of fruit flies. No one here is speaking of an individual creature evolving into another species. I do get what you are saying. The FACT is that no scientist working with any given species "population," has ever developed anything other than variations of the SAME "population." So, evolutionists have never (through "breeding" with any intent of developing a NEW species) have ever been able to demonstrate that such is feasible. Ending up with big breeds, small breeds, thin breeds, fat breeds, deformed breeds, different color breeds, doesn't prove your case at all. All it proves that there exists variable WITH each species populations which can shift but have limitations within KINDS that are insurmountable.

I can understand how evolutionists were able to hijack education by looking down their noses at anyone willing to disagree. It insults their high opinion of themselves and their place within the general "POPULATION."

I can understand as a religionist you can't accept biological evolution.

As to evolutionists hijacking education, I can understand that conspiracy theories are a convenient escape. You are free to reject science as one, vast, global conspiracy.

Your use of the slogan "kinds" is right out of the various fundamentalist creation ministries. Using such slogans makes you an accomplice to fraud and ignorance which is exactly what fundamentalist ministries press.

Observed Instances of Speciation

Some More Observed Speciation Events

CB910: New species

The above links, while they might offend your delicate religious sensibilites, address the "kinds" nonsense you find presented by the charlatans at any of the christian fundamentalist ministries.

I actually believe that you don't know what a new species is. One species cannot breed with another species. To be a "new species" there can be no cross fertilization. In other words, a mosquito is still a mosquito and a spaniel is still a breed of dog even if it isn't a hound. PS > Darwin was proved wrong concerning his finches. They still interbreed ---- it took a devastating hurricane to prove that reality...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh yes! I'm 100% totally wrong.

Correct, you are. When you say populations always "stay" something, you are 100% wrong. The precise opposite is true, and you couldn't stop it if you tried (Well, maybe a lot of us together could in one specific case, but it would have to be a large effort, and all the other cases would continue, unabated). Over millions of generations, two isolated populations of a single species will speciate from one another. The odds of this not happening approach zero, and it is as as certain as the fact that fusion happens at the core of the Sun. Mutations, drift, and selection all happen, and these are forces of nature and mathematical inevitability. If our descendants exist 10 million years from now, it's unlikely one of them would not be able to produce fertile offspring with a human being living today.

 

[LittleNipper]

Oh yes! I'm 100% totally wrong.

Correct, you are. When you say populations always "stay" something, you are 100% wrong. The precise opposite is true, and you couldn't stop it if you tried (Well, maybe a lot of us together could in one specific case, but it would have to be a large effort, and all the other cases would continue, unabated). Over millions of generations, two isolated populations of a single species will speciate from one another. The odds of this not happening approach zero, and it is as as certain as the fact that fusion happens at the core of the Sun. Mutations, drift, and selection all happen, and these are forces of nature and mathematical inevitability. If our descendants exist 10 million years from now, it's unlikely one of them would not be able to produce fertile offspring with a human being living today.

Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species. If scientists cannot do this then such cannot be proven to have ever happened.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.

Why? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.

And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...

 

[progressive hunter]

Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.

Why? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.

And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...

great deflection

there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind

 

[Hollie]

"POPULATONS" of cats remain "populations" of cats. Populations" of dogs remain "populations of dogs. "Populations" of fruit flies remain "populations" of fruit flies. No one here is speaking of an individual creature evolving into another species. I do get what you are saying. The FACT is that no scientist working with any given species "population," has ever developed anything other than variations of the SAME "population." So, evolutionists have never (through "breeding" with any intent of developing a NEW species) have ever been able to demonstrate that such is feasible. Ending up with big breeds, small breeds, thin breeds, fat breeds, deformed breeds, different color breeds, doesn't prove your case at all. All it proves that there exists variable WITH each species populations which can shift but have limitations within KINDS that are insurmountable.

I can understand how evolutionists were able to hijack education by looking down their noses at anyone willing to disagree. It insults their high opinion of themselves and their place within the general "POPULATION."

I can understand as a religionist you can't accept biological evolution.

As to evolutionists hijacking education, I can understand that conspiracy theories are a convenient escape. You are free to reject science as one, vast, global conspiracy.

Your use of the slogan "kinds" is right out of the various fundamentalist creation ministries. Using such slogans makes you an accomplice to fraud and ignorance which is exactly what fundamentalist ministries press.

Observed Instances of Speciation

Some More Observed Speciation Events

CB910: New species

The above links, while they might offend your delicate religious sensibilites, address the "kinds" nonsense you find presented by the charlatans at any of the christian fundamentalist ministries.

I actually believe that you don't know what a new species is. One species cannot breed with another species. To be a "new species" there can be no cross fertilization. In other words, a mosquito is still a mosquito and a spaniel is still a breed of dog even if it isn't a hound. PS > Darwin was proved wrong concerning his finches. They still interbreed ---- it took a devastating hurricane to prove that reality...

I’m actually convinced you were not able to understand the links I gave you. One species breeding into another species is simply a nonsense slogan spewed by charlatans at one or more of your fundamentalist crank ministries.

 

[Hollie]

Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.

Why? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.

And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...

great deflection

there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind

Why do you think that one species would suddenly give birth to another species? That again is a reflection of someone completely ignorant of the biological sciences. Also, your use of the term ‘kind” is a dead giveaway that you’re simply parotting the nonsense you were indoctrinated with at your fundamentalist crank ministries.

Biological evolution is change in populations over time. A rough analogy would be something like how the inventions of gods (including your gods), have changed over time.

 

[LittleNipper]

Why do you believe in millions of years of such ignorance? This is what I believe because I believe in GOD. And it makes total sense: Science and the Bible | Genesis and Genetics

 

[progressive hunter]

Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.

Why? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.

And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...

great deflection

there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind

Why do you think that one species would suddenly give birth to another species? That again is a reflection of someone completely ignorant of the biological sciences. Also, your use of the term ‘kind” is a dead giveaway that you’re simply parotting the nonsense you were indoctrinated with at your fundamentalist crank ministries.

Biological evolution is change in populations over time. A rough analogy would be something like how the inventions of gods (including your gods), have changed over time.

so your playing make believe at the beach

based on that things magically change??

got any examples

 

[Hollie]

Why do you believe in millions of years of such ignorance? This is what I believe because I believe in GOD. And it makes total sense: Science and the Bible | Genesis and Genetics

From the About section of your link.

"We are a small group of creationists who focus on analyzing DNA pertaining to Genesis. Our projects include ancient man, human migration, and which animals were on Noah’s Ark. We believe that the Bible is truth and that none of the tenets of evolution are valid, including speciation and natural selection."


It actually is alarming that such wilfull ignorance exists.

Sorry, but appeals to fear and superstition fail on many levels. . Biological evolution is a science fact with reams of data to support it. Biological organisms evolve. That fact is not disputed by the relevant science community.

None of the scientific theories that explain natural phenomena make appeals to supernaturalism. If you or any creatiinists have evidence that something shows signs of supernatural design (something that could not have arisen naturally) please come forward with it. To date, no one has. Fundie Christians are the ones introducing supernatural forces... they are the ones who must substantiate their incredible claims.

Unfortunately, there are those limited souls who obsess exclusively on a haphazard compilation of writings arbitrarily edited and dubiously translated by flawed human beings as if it were an excusive and infallible literal message from a god to the exclusion of ongoing revelation through scientific inquiry. Such a fixation upon a single imperfect literary work is, of course, a common form of idolatry.

 

[Muhammed]

Most idiots/tards think the flood was caused solely by 40 days of rain, but the truth is, GOD says he "opened the fountains of the deep."

So when did you hear GOD say that?

 

[progressive hunter]

Most idiots/tards think the flood was caused solely by 40 days of rain, but the truth is, GOD says he "opened the fountains of the deep."

So when did you hear GOD say that?

when he was humping Allah up the ass

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why do you believe in millions of years of such ignorance? This is what I believe because I believe in GOD. And it makes total sense: Science and the Bible | Genesis and Genetics

Why do you avoid every question posed to you about evolution?

Easy answer: because you know less than nothing about it.

 

[progressive hunter]

Why do you believe in millions of years of such ignorance? This is what I believe because I believe in GOD. And it makes total sense: Science and the Bible | Genesis and Genetics

Why do you avoid every question posed to you about evolution?

Easy answer: because you know less than nothing about it.

the same reason you ignore every question

 

[LittleNipper]

Why do you believe in millions of years of such ignorance? This is what I believe because I believe in GOD. And it makes total sense: Science and the Bible | Genesis and Genetics

From the About section of your link.

"We are a small group of creationists who focus on analyzing DNA pertaining to Genesis. Our projects include ancient man, human migration, and which animals were on Noah’s Ark. We believe that the Bible is truth and that none of the tenets of evolution are valid, including speciation and natural selection."


It actually is alarming that such wilfull ignorance exists.

Sorry, but appeals to fear and superstition fail on many levels. . Biological evolution is a science fact with reams of data to support it. Biological organisms evolve. That fact is not disputed by the relevant science community.

None of the scientific theories that explain natural phenomena make appeals to supernaturalism. If you or any creatiinists have evidence that something shows signs of supernatural design (something that could not have arisen naturally) please come forward with it. To date, no one has. Fundie Christians are the ones introducing supernatural forces... they are the ones who must substantiate their incredible claims.

Unfortunately, there are those limited souls who obsess exclusively on a haphazard compilation of writings arbitrarily edited and dubiously translated by flawed human beings as if it were an excusive and infallible literal message from a god to the exclusion of ongoing revelation through scientific inquiry. Such a fixation upon a single imperfect literary work is, of course, a common form of idolatry.

I believe it is alarming that people do not believe in GOD. GOD and not you is in control. What keeps an asteroid from hitting the earth right now? Do you actually believe you could prevent it? I love science, but I'm not limited to what some people label as "NATURAL". I fully realize that the supernatural exists and GOD is that Creator.

 

[LittleNipper]

Why do you believe in millions of years of such ignorance? This is what I believe because I believe in GOD. And it makes total sense: Science and the Bible | Genesis and Genetics

Why do you avoid every question posed to you about evolution?

Easy answer: because you know less than nothing about it.

I know more than you because I'm not limited to the theory of "EVOLUTION."

 

[james bond]

More evidence for God. Science backs up the Bible regarding porn use.

"The Bible tells us, in 1 Corinthians 6:18, that sexual sin has negative physical consequences:

Escape from sexual immorality. Every sin that a man commits is outside the body. But he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. (MEV)

Now, science has confirmed what God’s word has established.

Regardless of the type of sexual sin—premarital sex, adultery, or viewing pornography—it alters how the human brain functions. Indulged in repeatedly, one’s conscience is seared, a physical change in the brain that numbs one to the guilt and conviction of his or her wrongdoing.

MORE POWERFUL THAN MORPHINE

The producers of the Conquer Series—a cinematic DVD series that helps men break free from pornography— note that when porn is viewed, powerful hormones are released, including:

• oxytocin—called “the love hormone,” it is typically released when one is hugged or kissed, regulating social interactions, sexual reproduction, and human bonding.
• vasopressin—used as medication, it numbs pain.

This concoction of hormones rewires the brain, giving it the wrong material, luring one deeper into a prison of his or her own making. It’s intoxicating, intended to bring loved ones closer and promote mental healing, but instead having the opposite effect and confusing the mind.

Conquer Series expert contributor Heart to Heart Counseling Center Executive Director Dr. Doug Weiss said:

When [you] have a sexual experience, your brains makes these opiates which [are] four times stronger than morphine. Boom! It hits your brain, your brain lights up like a Christmas tree. This is the highest chemical reward your brain gets for anything. That’s why a lot of guys get in trouble, even in ministry. They don’t know their brain is defective.

This way, sexual sin takes a profound toll on the brain, and the rest of the body. The sinner knows watching porn is a shameful act that must be kept secret, yet each time one views it, he or she “trusts” it more as a result of the pairing and deep mental bond forged by the hormones."

TruNews with Rick Wiles, Real News, Latest News, Christian News

 

[Hollie]

More evidence for God. Science backs up the Bible regarding porn use.

"The Bible tells us, in 1 Corinthians 6:18, that sexual sin has negative physical consequences:

Escape from sexual immorality. Every sin that a man commits is outside the body. But he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. (MEV)

Now, science has confirmed what God’s word has established.

Regardless of the type of sexual sin—premarital sex, adultery, or viewing pornography—it alters how the human brain functions. Indulged in repeatedly, one’s conscience is seared, a physical change in the brain that numbs one to the guilt and conviction of his or her wrongdoing.

MORE POWERFUL THAN MORPHINE

The producers of the Conquer Series—a cinematic DVD series that helps men break free from pornography— note that when porn is viewed, powerful hormones are released, including:

• oxytocin—called “the love hormone,” it is typically released when one is hugged or kissed, regulating social interactions, sexual reproduction, and human bonding.
• vasopressin—used as medication, it numbs pain.

This concoction of hormones rewires the brain, giving it the wrong material, luring one deeper into a prison of his or her own making. It’s intoxicating, intended to bring loved ones closer and promote mental healing, but instead having the opposite effect and confusing the mind.

Conquer Series expert contributor Heart to Heart Counseling Center Executive Director Dr. Doug Weiss said:

When [you] have a sexual experience, your brains makes these opiates which [are] four times stronger than morphine. Boom! It hits your brain, your brain lights up like a Christmas tree. This is the highest chemical reward your brain gets for anything. That’s why a lot of guys get in trouble, even in ministry. They don’t know their brain is defective.

This way, sexual sin takes a profound toll on the brain, and the rest of the body. The sinner knows watching porn is a shameful act that must be kept secret, yet each time one views it, he or she “trusts” it more as a result of the pairing and deep mental bond forged by the hormones."

TruNews with Rick Wiles, Real News, Latest News, Christian News

An Introduction to Biblical Nonsense