Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???And YES! There is scientific proof that the entire earth was once covered in water and this is from a secular group nonetheless: Early Earth 'was covered in water' | Metro News
Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???And YES! There is scientific proof that the entire earth was once covered in water and this is from a secular group nonetheless: Early Earth 'was covered in water' | Metro News
Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
sorry I dont like playing make believeWhat part of "if" didn't you understand?I have blonde hair and my wife has brown hair and we dont have childrenIf you and your wife have dark hair, and you have a child that has blond hair, haven't given birth to something that is "not your own kind?"great deflectionWhy? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.
And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...
there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind
ROFL! Now I'm convinced!The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???And YES! There is scientific proof that the entire earth was once covered in water and this is from a secular group nonetheless: Early Earth 'was covered in water' | Metro News
Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
no it doesnt
You mean you are incapable of analyzing facts and logic.sorry I dont like playing make believeWhat part of "if" didn't you understand?I have blonde hair and my wife has brown hair and we dont have childrenIf you and your wife have dark hair, and you have a child that has blond hair, haven't given birth to something that is "not your own kind?"great deflectionWhy? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.
And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...
there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind
its the facts and logic thats the problemYou mean you are incapable of analyzing facts and logic.sorry I dont like playing make believeWhat part of "if" didn't you understand?I have blonde hair and my wife has brown hair and we dont have childrenIf you and your wife have dark hair, and you have a child that has blond hair, haven't given birth to something that is "not your own kind?"great deflection
there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind
True. You don't comprehend them.its the facts and logic thats the problemYou mean you are incapable of analyzing facts and logic.sorry I dont like playing make believeWhat part of "if" didn't you understand?I have blonde hair and my wife has brown hair and we dont have childrenIf you and your wife have dark hair, and you have a child that has blond hair, haven't given birth to something that is "not your own kind?"
The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???And YES! There is scientific proof that the entire earth was once covered in water and this is from a secular group nonetheless: Early Earth 'was covered in water' | Metro News
Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
no it doesnt
I have blonde hair and my wife has brown hair and we dont have childrenIf you and your wife have dark hair, and you have a child that has blond hair, haven't given birth to something that is "not your own kind?"great deflectionWhy? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.
And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...
there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind
The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???And YES! There is scientific proof that the entire earth was once covered in water and this is from a secular group nonetheless: Early Earth 'was covered in water' | Metro News
Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
no it doesnt
The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???And YES! There is scientific proof that the entire earth was once covered in water and this is from a secular group nonetheless: Early Earth 'was covered in water' | Metro News
Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
too late I have 2 boysI have blonde hair and my wife has brown hair and we dont have childrenIf you and your wife have dark hair, and you have a child that has blond hair, haven't given birth to something that is "not your own kind?"great deflectionWhy? What an odd request. What does that have to do with anything? I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.Show us where scientists have changed any given living organism of a particular species into an entirely DIFFERENT species.
And why should anyone answer your questions anyway, ya rude little bastard? Every time I ask you to explain anything, you're off like a prom dress...
there is no proof what so ever that any animal or man has ever given birth to anything but its own kind
I’m thankful people like you don’t breed.
I'm not sure I understand your question.The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???Firstly, your frantic claim to "proof" is based upon a study, that has not undergone peer review.
Secondly, did you read what was in the article?
".... billions of years ago the Earth’s deep mantle was 200C hotter than it is today."
Billions of years ago directly refutes the ID'iot / creationist claim to a biblical 6,000 year old earth.
Oops.
no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
you wouldntI'm not sure I understand your question.The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.but there is no proof the earth is billions of yrs old,,,in fact there is more proof its far younger,,,didnt you read our articles???
no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
More evidence for God. Science backs up the Bible regarding porn use.
"The Bible tells us, in 1 Corinthians 6:18, that sexual sin has negative physical consequences:
Escape from sexual immorality. Every sin that a man commits is outside the body. But he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. (MEV)
Now, science has confirmed what Gods word has established.
Regardless of the type of sexual sinpremarital sex, adultery, or viewing pornographyit alters how the human brain functions. Indulged in repeatedly, ones conscience is seared, a physical change in the brain that numbs one to the guilt and conviction of his or her wrongdoing.
MORE POWERFUL THAN MORPHINE
The producers of the Conquer Seriesa cinematic DVD series that helps men break free from pornography note that when porn is viewed, powerful hormones are released, including:
This concoction of hormones rewires the brain, giving it the wrong material, luring one deeper into a prison of his or her own making. Its intoxicating, intended to bring loved ones closer and promote mental healing, but instead having the opposite effect and confusing the mind.
- oxytocincalled the love hormone, it is typically released when one is hugged or kissed, regulating social interactions, sexual reproduction, and human bonding.
- vasopressinused as medication, it numbs pain.
Conquer Series expert contributor Heart to Heart Counseling Center Executive Director Dr. Doug Weiss said:
When [you] have a sexual experience, your brains makes these opiates which [are] four times stronger than morphine. Boom! It hits your brain, your brain lights up like a Christmas tree. This is the highest chemical reward your brain gets for anything. Thats why a lot of guys get in trouble, even in ministry. They dont know their brain is defective.
This way, sexual sin takes a profound toll on the brain, and the rest of the body. The sinner knows watching porn is a shameful act that must be kept secret, yet each time one views it, he or she trusts it more as a result of the pairing and deep mental bond forged by the hormones."
TruNews with Rick Wiles, Real News, Latest News, Christian News
An Introduction to Biblical Nonsense
People get addicted on porn like drugs. That is not nonsense. It sounds you're addicted to nonsense.
On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.
Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.
What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.
Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.
The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?
I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.
You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.
You mean they don't show the snow that accumulated over a year?you wouldntI'm not sure I understand your question.The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.
no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
ice llayers mean nothing
The lost squadron - creation.com
You mean the don't show the snow that accumulated over a year?you wouldntI'm not sure I understand your question.no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
ice llayers mean nothing
The lost squadron - creation.com
you wouldntI'm not sure I understand your question.The dendrochronologic record—tree ring data—now goes back 12,000 years in some parts of the world. That makes a mockery of Bishop Ushers calculation for the age of the earth of 6,000 years.
no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
ice llayers mean nothing
The lost squadron - creation.com
coming from a dumb **** that thinks beachs are a conspiracy theory that doesnt mean muchyou wouldntI'm not sure I understand your question.no it doesnt
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
ice llayers mean nothing
The lost squadron - creation.com
Ignorance, falsehoods and misrepresentations brought to you by the charlatans at one of the most notoriously inept fundamentalist ministries.
coming from a dumb **** that thinks beachs are a conspiracy theory that doesnt mean muchyou wouldntI'm not sure I understand your question.
Ice layering: 145,000
A section of an ice core with clearly defined annual layers.
Ice layering is a phenomenon that is almost universally observed in ice sheets and glaciers where the average temperature does not rise above freezing.
Annual differences in temperature and irradiation cause ice to form differently from year to year, and this generates alternating layers of light and dark ice, much like tree rings. This method is considered a relatively accurate way to measure the age of an ice sheet, as only one layer will form per year. While there have been a few cases where several layers have formed per year, these incidents do not challenge the ability of ice layering to provide a minimum age, as these false layers can be discerned from the real thing upon close inspection.
Currently, the greatest number of layers found in a single ice sheet is over 700,000, which clearly contradicts the idea of an Earth less than 10,000 years old. Even if one were to assume an absurdly high average of ten layers per year, the age demonstrated by this method would still be far greater than that suggested by young Earth creationists.[20]
Nevertheless, the age of the Earth identified by these means is 160,000 years (±15,000 years), which makes it excruciatingly unlikely that the ice is anything less than 145,000 years.
if something was buried 75 yrs ago how many ice layers would there be???
ice llayers mean nothing
The lost squadron - creation.com
Ignorance, falsehoods and misrepresentations brought to you by the charlatans at one of the most notoriously inept fundamentalist ministries.
