Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
Yes, I'm with you in understanding, and with you in agreement.Maybe too clever to state uninformed opinions ... at least not without color coding ... you do understand my claim about scientific dissent? ... scientific method encourages alternate theories and more experiments ... we just gave a Nobel Prize in 2011 to the folks who destroyed the Big Bang Theory ...
Scientific theories are written in pencil ... so we can erase the parts we find to be in error ... and go light on gravity, looks like that all has to be changed some time in the future ...
Nope.I'm glad you don't agree blindly ... either side ... you've experienced weather first-hand ... now use your common sense ... will a single degree temperature increase cause 300 mph hurricanes every year in Florida? ... or wide-spread crop damage from hockey sticks sweeping down from Canada? ...
Great points!You don't believe Darwinism? ... I'm shocked ... what next? ... meteors don't cause weather ... that's insane ... why would we still call the science "meteorology" if meteors aren't causing our day-to-day weather? ... what do the alchemists have to say? ...
Sure Mendel's work with gentics is scientific, very repeatable, often replicated - even by school children, and acceptance is not motivated by any particular dogma.Ha ha ha ... I do know what you mean ... how do you feel about Mendel's work ... we can cross pea plants and duplicate his findings easy peasy ... I've grown gardens my whole life and can vouch for the results as commonly understand ... some traits are inherited by simple mathematical formula ... other traits, not so simple ...
That makes sense.The difference is the mid-19th Century Fluid Mechanics I'm using has been largely verified by modern 21st Century Field Theory ... the mid-19th Century Natural Philosophy understandings have been largely replaced by 21st Century Biochemistry ...