Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
If father/son marriages is something you wish to legalize, do the legal ground work that gays have been doing for decades.It will go 6-3 in favor
maybe, then you and your brother jake snarkey can get married
but seriously RW, if you get the ruling you want, what exactly would prevent brothers from marrying? what exactly would prevent fathers and sons from marrying to avoid inheritence taxes?
the slippery slope is real, whether you realize it or not.
grow the fuck up,. its not something I want, its the next step in the destruction of our society in order to appease the 4% that prefer butt fucking to normal sex.
keep up the shit and you may join seabytch on my ignore list.
Again..do your own legal leg work on your incest issue.It will go 6-3 in favor
maybe, then you and your brother jake snarkey can get married
but seriously RW, if you get the ruling you want, what exactly would prevent brothers from marrying? what exactly would prevent fathers and sons from marrying to avoid inheritence taxes?
the slippery slope is real, whether you realize it or not.
Incest laws
why are incest laws not discriminatory? incest was practiced by humans for thousands of years, the ruling families of europe were very good at it. Is a union of a father and son who are both over 21 considered incest? I don't think so. Incest has to do with opposite sex intercourse within the same family tree.
so my point remains vaild, got anything else?
If the SCOTUS doesn't support the gays then what? You can't sue the SCOTUS.
You think a cake not being baked was bad. Just wait if they refuse to hear this one
OMG omg omg omg omg. it will be tens time as ugly as all the rest of their Faux outrages
It will go 6-3 in favor
maybe, then you and your brother jake snarkey can get married
but seriously RW, if you get the ruling you want, what exactly would prevent brothers from marrying? what exactly would prevent fathers and sons from marrying to avoid inheritence taxes?
the slippery slope is real, whether you realize it or not.
Incest laws
why are incest laws not discriminatory?
Just more drama for the masses; there is no appeal to ignorance Article 4, Section 2.Looks like SCOTUS ruling in favor of SSM isn't the lock the homos led everyone to believe. Roberts nailed it. Kennedy is all over the map, he's obviously conflicted.
Gay Marriage Arguments Divide Supreme Court Justices
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. suggested that Ms. Bonauto was asking the court to do something radical.
“You’re not seeking to join the institution,” he said. “You’re seeking to change what the institution is.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/29/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage.html
Oh. Is that his real fear?Please explain how homosexual marriages will cause you to no longer to be able to get it up and procreate.There's no logical reason to have same sex marriage. Genders matter. So homophobia is now defined as fear of marriage destruction? You have a unique dictionary.Really? Their is literally no logical reason to oppose homosexuals getting married other then religious bullshit, or homophobia (Afraid of gays, thinking gays will destroy marriage..)
That straight lifestyle seems to be causing a lot of problems. Maybe we should let the states regulate it, for the safety of everyone.Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.
Is your chosen religion a lifestyle choice?
this is not about religion, its about biology and anatomy.
We are talking about lifestyle choices
Is your religion a choice?
And every morning, he wakes up and decides to go on being straight.
Hello? They ARE hearing this one. Aren't you paying attention? Isn't that why you were thrown out of the SCOTUS chambers yesterday?If the SCOTUS doesn't support the gays then what? You can't sue the SCOTUS.
You think a cake not being baked was bad. Just wait if they refuse to hear this one
OMG omg omg omg omg. it will be tens time as ugly as all the rest of their Faux outrages
I have no issues with your homosexual pleasure seeking, rich lifestyle. I do not have issues for homosexuals getting into legally binding contracts but do not called it marriage. That's where the issues come when you try to destroy families to fade the lines between normal people and pleasure seeking homosexuals.Yes there is, two loving members of the same sex want to get married, yes, genders do matter, when it comes to fucking, what does it matter there? Marriage destruction? LOL. Do you think two gay men getting married destroys marriage? You must have a shitty marriage then.There's no logical reason to have same sex marriage. Genders matter. So homophobia is now defined as fear of marriage destruction? You have a unique dictionary.
How is allowing gays access to marriage destroying families? Specifically.
That isn't what gays are after.
Yeah, they want the right to marry a piano.
"We've always discriminated against this group" is the worst excuse there is. And one of the Justices rightly pointed out the same argument was used to defend discrimination against blacks.They will decide they cannot dictate social policy to all the states and overturn 1000 years of western tradition.
Same bullshit, different decade.
If the SCOTUS doesn't support the gays then what? You can't sue the SCOTUS.
You think a cake not being baked was bad. Just wait if they refuse to hear this one
OMG omg omg omg omg. it will be tens time as ugly as all the rest of their Faux outrages
"OMG OMG frikken frikken homo cake iz fritzen-schnizten Faux autrayges (*snort* *shart* *diet coke belch*) their doing it agian THEYV GAWT to gow GAWd ugly ten tymz!"
So you admit that lifestyle choices can be protected as civil rights.Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.Civil rights are not up for a vote, and never should have been. You might as well allow them to define a state religion, and we don't. It's also not up for a vote.Really? Their is literally no logical reason to oppose homosexuals getting married other then religious bullshit, or homophobia (Afraid of gays, thinking gays will destroy marriage..)
There's also no logical reason to not allow states to decide that from themselves so that marriage truly reflects the value of the people, not activist judges.
Is your chosen religion a lifestyle choice?
Religion is protected. Gay butt sex isn't. You should read the Constitution sometime.
"Sue the Supreme Court."well if she does then they should the sue the Supreme court. they are making a mockery out of them as it is over all this
Er.....no he didn't. He's not gay."We've always discriminated against this group" is the worst excuse there is. And one of the Justices rightly pointed out the same argument was used to defend discrimination against blacks.They will decide they cannot dictate social policy to all the states and overturn 1000 years of western tradition.
Same bullshit, different decade.
Blacks don't choosr to be black, but according to Bruce Jenner, he/she chose to be gay.
Huge difference
Funny that the phony christians don't have the same concern for the children of straight couples.
Why do they hold gays up to a much higher standard than they do gays?
My problem with that is the "people" weren't the ones elected to represent me. Not sure "majority rule" is a good idea.Well of course they are.
Duh.
Very telling that some believe equal rights, as guaranteed by our constitution is "something radical".
Straights have changed the definition of marriage many times. Are you phobes okay with that?
The real question here is whether homosexuality is a normal human condition. The marriage issue is just a dodge of the real issue.
Society as a whole should decide this, not 9 old farts in black robes.
Er.....no he didn't. He's not gay."We've always discriminated against this group" is the worst excuse there is. And one of the Justices rightly pointed out the same argument was used to defend discrimination against blacks.They will decide they cannot dictate social policy to all the states and overturn 1000 years of western tradition.
Same bullshit, different decade.
Blacks don't choosr to be black, but according to Bruce Jenner, he/she chose to be gay.
Huge difference
Who aren't straight people allowed to marry? Anyone in particular that gay people ALSO won't be allowed to marry?Being "straight" is a civil right?And according to the 10th Amendment, that is categorically a state issue. Being queer isn't a civil right.It has nothing at all with what they do in bed. It has only to do with what happens at the country clerk's office.Is your chosen religion a lifestyle choice?
Religion is protected. Gay butt sex isn't. You should read the Constitution sometime.
Neither is. Even straight people can't marry whoever they want to.
Doesn't change the fact that he was equal before the law as a male, and will be as a female. This is about equality, not gender, genitals, or sexual orientation."We've always discriminated against this group" is the worst excuse there is. And one of the Justices rightly pointed out the same argument was used to defend discrimination against blacks.They will decide they cannot dictate social policy to all the states and overturn 1000 years of western tradition.
Same bullshit, different decade.
Blacks don't choosr to be black, but according to Bruce Jenner, he/she chose to be gay.
Huge difference
