I wouldn't tell the goddamn Democrat witch hunters anything either. They can go fuck themselves.
Trump claims only monsters take the 5th.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't tell the goddamn Democrat witch hunters anything either. They can go fuck themselves.
IOW, you can fuck off and prove your case, fascist punk.IOW, the truth is incriminating for your Dear Leader.
Why does authorizing the investigation of the illegal removal of classified documents from the WH make Garland Der Fuhrer?Meaning what?
That they were just following orders from Der Fuher?
Allegations with no evidence -that anyone including you knows about- makes Garland more like Himmler than Hitler....It also makes you the jackbooted little fascist fuck that you are.Why does authorizing the investigation of the illegal removal of classified documents from the WH make Garland Der Fuhrer?
COURT ISSUED WARRANTAllegations with no evidence
Because the FBI has NEVER EVER lied in order to obtain a warrant....And speaking of warrants, why did they go to a local magistrate and not a federal judge?COURT ISSUED WARRANT
Do you have any clue what those words mean? It means EXACTLY OPPOSITE of what you've just said, it necessitates EVIDENCE presented to the court.
Take your horseshit somewhere else, because the only thing you are doing here is making a fucking clown of yourself.
There is zero evidence anyone lied on anything having to do with the evidence presented to the court for this warrant. You WOULD LIKE for that to be the case, but that doesn't make it so.Because the FBI has NEVER EVER lied in order to obtain a warrant...
No evidence that the Stasi lies!There is zero evidence anyone lied on anything, you just WOULD LIKE for that to be the case, but your wishful thinking is just that..
What is the evidence that someone lied about what was presented in this warrant application?No evidence that the Stasi lies!
Do you like the flavor of the Kiwi or Angelus boot black best?What is the evidence that someone lied about what was presented in this warrant application?
If you can't coherently answer that question then just give it a rest already.
My comments:
Biden and the Deep State are out of control
Reading comprehension issues?Your link says that Trump’s lawyers looked through the box, not the government.
Liar.
What is the Presidential Records Act?
- After former President Nixon refused to hand over White House records during the Watergate scandal, Congress in 1978 passed a law requiring presidents to preserve all historically relevant materials.
- "The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records," the law says.
- The National Archives and Record Administration (NARA), which oversees the process, sifts through the documents to determine which can be made public and which should be redacted based a number of factors, including but not limited to "the interest of national defense or foreign policy" and relating to appointments to federal office, trade secrets and commercial or financial information.
- A president can only destroy a document if they receive permission from the Archives to do so.
The advantage liberals have over conservatives when it comes to having the facts on our side is that you folks believe inveterate liars like Hannity. Someone who works for a cable station with a business model designed to misinform its audience for profit.
All of those records should have been handed over to the National Archives directly from the White House once Trump left office in January 2021, as required by the Presidential Records Act, the agency noted.
That law “mandates that all Presidential records must be properly preserved by each Administration so that a complete set of Presidential records is transferred to the National Archives at the end of the Administration,” U.S. Archivist David Ferriero said in the statement.
Oh well if Bobb said so. It’s not like Trump or his lawyers have ever been accused of being anything but totally truthful. I mean, if they committed felonies they obviously would have said so.Reading comprehension issues?
"Bobb said she and Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran met later with a senior Justice Department official whose name she could not recall. Trump appeared at the beginning of the meeting, in June, and greeted investigators, Bobb said, adding that the former president was not interviewed. Federal officials then looked through boxes of material, Bobb added."
I know because the Feds already went thru the boxes of documents, duh. The raid was bullshit, looking for J6 evidence, not archive records.And you know this how?
Are you an FBI agent that was there doing the search?
The Feds already went thru the boxes of documents, duh. The raid was illegitimate.Horseshit, Archives clearly has been fighting to get documents Trump took for a long time. To now assert that nothing was taken inappropriately is just silly nonsense.
I know because the Feds already went thru the boxes of documents, duh. The raid was bullshit, looking for J6 evidence, not archive records.
Bobb said she and Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran met later with a senior Justice Department official whose name she could not recall. Trump appeared at the beginning of the meeting, in June, and greeted investigators, Bobb said, adding that the former president was not interviewed. Federal officials then looked through boxes of material, Bobb added.
So, they were the exact same boxes. You know for 100% fact that nothing was added to them between the meeting in June and now?
You know with 100% fact they were not looking for anything else when they went there but those exact boxes?
He has nothing but his blind hatred for all things Orange Man.Do you have any evidence at all that there was anything illegal was done? Isn't that really the crux of the whole thing? Our justice system requires sufficient grounds based on hard evidence as opposed to suspicions of any illegal activity before we raid somebody's house. You gotta have some reason to believe that there were other boxes or that something was added. Coulda been doesn't cut it, you gotta have more than a suspicion.
You don't raid somebody's house without cause and then later say see, look what we found! We were right, he did this, this, and this! Cuz if that is okay then the 4th Amendment doesn't mean a fucking thing. I gotta be honest here, this has all the appearance of another witch hunt similar to what the democrats did in 2016.
Do you have any evidence at all that there was anything illegal was done? Isn't that really the crux of the whole thing? Our justice system requires sufficient grounds based on hard evidence as opposed to suspicions of any illegal activity before we raid somebody's house. You gotta have some reason to believe that there were other boxes or that something was added. Coulda been doesn't cut it, you gotta have more than a suspicion.
You don't raid somebody's house without cause and then later say see, look what we found! We were right, he did this, this, and this! Cuz if that is okay then the 4th Amendment doesn't mean a fucking thing. I gotta be honest here, this has all the appearance of another witch hunt similar to what the democrats did in 2016.