Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is Mitch waiting for?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
I've heard that "Elections have consequences":
Go figure
In 2014, the people gave control of the senate to the GOP.You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
I've heard that "Elections have consequences":
Go figure
To bad our founders wrote our Constitution in such a way as to solve the problem Republicans created when rhey refused to allow Obama's nomination a hearing.Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
I've heard that "Elections have consequences":
Go figure
That's a fucking lie, the commies are talking about legislation to increase the number of judges on the court if they manage to get the WH, so a commie can appoint them. And they're crying about the court being too political, they just want to appoint more activist judges to make it more political. You fucking commies keep it up and this cold civil war just might heat up.
.
To bad our founders wrote our Constitution in such a way as to solve the problem Republicans created when rhey refused to allow Obama's nomination a hearing.Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
I've heard that "Elections have consequences":
Go figure
That's a fucking lie, the commies are talking about legislation to increase the number of judges on the court if they manage to get the WH, so a commie can appoint them. And they're crying about the court being too political, they just want to appoint more activist judges to make it more political. You fucking commies keep it up and this cold civil war just might heat up.
.
Republicans used a technicality to put one of their guys on the court. Now Dem's are talking about using one for an evening of the score. If Dem's win White House and Senate, the consequences will be in their favor.You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
I've heard that "Elections have consequences":
Go figure
Where does the constitution say the Senate has to hold a hearing on a nomination from the President?To bad our founders wrote our Constitution in such a way as to solve the problem Republicans created when rhey refused to allow Obama's nomination a hearing.
"The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it," the brief said.
"Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be 'restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.'"
In the same poll, 55 percent believed the Supreme Court was "motivated by politics" more than by the law.
The Socialist/Communist/DemonRATS no longer even hide their desire to be a DICTATORSHIP in America...
You mean like when Republicans denied Obama and Dem's a Supreme Court seat and refused to hold hearings on his nomination?What is Mitch waiting for?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?
Great, let's do it right NOW! Agree?
.
The democrats to do it first, ala the nuclear option. Republicans have more respect for tradition and fairness than democrats have.
Three branches of government but great Trump gets to pick more or another Republican president. But do you really want the American voters watching democrats pissing all over themselves because they can't have it their way?What rule says you can’t change the number of justices?