Senate (GOP) rejects amendment to build border fence

Note: "Saying stuff that hurts Synthia's widdle feewings" =/= "lying".

And do what with them? Escort them to the nearest DNC office to register to vote?

Nope. No hatred for veterans here, folks. Move along, move along.

Dumbass.


Again, you cannot counter my arguments. :lol:
You have no arguments.


Another lie from you - it comes so easily to you.

My argument is that drones can do the job of monitoring the border at far less cost.


troll said:
Chickenshit. :lol:

Is this your self-assessment of your participation in this thread? Because you're too chickenshit to debate me, obviously.
 
Again, you cannot counter my arguments. :lol:
You have no arguments.


Another lie from you - it comes so easily to you.

My argument is that drones can do the job of monitoring the border at far less cost.
Never mind the fact that it's easier to stop them from crossing than picking them up after they get here.

Do you lock your house's doors? Why? It's easier to call the cops after the bad guy's in your house, right?
troll said:
Chickenshit. :lol:

Is this your self-assessment of your participation in this thread? Because you're too chickenshit to debate me, obviously.
Well, given the fact that you claim to be a musician who thinks the term "record deal" is not longer used, EVEN AFTER I POSTED LINKS ONLY HOURS OLD SHOWING THE TERM IS CURRENT, I'd say your judgement is worth about as much as a bucket of sloth shit.

Plus, the fact that you refuse to quote where I proved you wrong pretty much confirms you're the chickenshit here, boy.

Probably aren't even a musician, either. NOTE: Playing "Guitar Hero" doesn't count, kid.
 
You have no arguments.


Another lie from you - it comes so easily to you.

My argument is that drones can do the job of monitoring the border at far less cost.
Never mind the fact that it's easier to stop them from crossing than picking them up after they get here.

Do you lock your house's doors? Why? It's easier to call the cops after the bad guy's in your house, right?

This is desert expanse, correct?

C'mon. Use your brain. You can do it.
 
Another lie from you - it comes so easily to you.

My argument is that drones can do the job of monitoring the border at far less cost.
Never mind the fact that it's easier to stop them from crossing than picking them up after they get here.

Do you lock your house's doors? Why? It's easier to call the cops after the bad guy's in your house, right?

This is desert expanse, correct?

C'mon. Use your brain. You can do it.
Do you lock your house's doors? Answer the question.
 
as far as the fence and border guards to be built and hired, Obama just deep sixed a law for a year in the aca bill , why wouldn't he put that off too?
Well, speculation is certainly easier than refuting my drone argument, isn't it?

I wasn't concerned with refuting anything in particular, I posed a general question.....


I am sorry if you feel neglected.....cheer up, your milk and cookies are waiting, get into your jammies first :rolleyes:
 
But you're fine with adding more Federal jobs, plus their pensions, in perpetuity?

Small government, my ass.



That chart is clearly a lie. It's a lie of omission.

Show the chart going back into the Bush years and you will see that any increase under Obama is still a massive cut from under Bush.

It's from Heritage - no wonder it's false.

Beside being a joke you are so illiterate, the source is not from the Heritage its from the United States Department of Labor, the Heritage only reported it.

You will also note that the increases started when the Democrats took power in both houses.

The original info is from Labor. The deceptive chart is from Heritage.

Employees: The number of federal employees grew by 123,000, or 6.2%, under President Obama, according to the White House's Office of Management and Budget.

Did Obama really make government bigger? - Jan. 25, 2012

and



9.10.12-Strain-Post-1.png


you asked for refutation, right?
 
Another lie from you - it comes so easily to you.

My argument is that drones can do the job of monitoring the border at far less cost.

While drone can be part of the overall equation, how does a drone apprehend an illegal. Use Obama plan in the past and bomb them?
Are you incapable of following a thread?

Oh, I have little trouble following any thread, but I do have trouble following your logic as most of the time its either full of half truths or out and out lies to try to sway people to your agenda. For example you claim that the Immigration law will add 40K border agents when in fact it increases the number of border agents to 40K.

As far as the Senate rejecting the border fence I would suggest you do some further research and you will find that the Senate did later agree to building the fence among other provisions. Including adding 20K border agents.

Senate Approves Landmark Immigration Bill After Border Amendment Draws GOP Support

The Senate has approved the long-awaited immigration reform bill that creates a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants while imposing unprecedented new measures for border security. Fourteen Republicans joined a united Democratic caucus to pass the bill by a vote of 68 to 32. It includes an amendment that radically expands enforcement along the U.S.-Mexico border, spending $46 billion to nearly double the number of border agents to 40,000, expand the use of drones, and construct around 700 miles of border fencing. The measure now faces an uncertain fate in the House, where Speaker John Boehner says he will not allow a vote without the majority support of Republican members.

What do you have to say to that hotshot?
 
as far as the fence and border guards to be built and hired, Obama just deep sixed a law for a year in the aca bill , why wouldn't he put that off too?
Well, speculation is certainly easier than refuting my drone argument, isn't it?

I wasn't concerned with refuting anything in particular, I posed a general question.....


I am sorry if you feel neglected.....cheer up, your milk and cookies are waiting, get into your jammies first :rolleyes:
Instead of the usual lack of substance, how about telling us if you think 24 hr. a day drones will work along the border, constantly feeding surveillance to a bunch of border agenst in well-air conditioned rooms, dispatching field agents to Tumbleweed #3946 to intercept the illegal entrants?
 
Last edited:
Beside being a joke you are so illiterate, the source is not from the Heritage its from the United States Department of Labor, the Heritage only reported it.

You will also note that the increases started when the Democrats took power in both houses.

The original info is from Labor. The deceptive chart is from Heritage.

Employees: The number of federal employees grew by 123,000, or 6.2%, under President Obama, according to the White House's Office of Management and Budget.

Did Obama really make government bigger? - Jan. 25, 2012

and



9.10.12-Strain-Post-1.png


you asked for refutation, right?
January, 2012? :cool:
 
While drone can be part of the overall equation, how does a drone apprehend an illegal. Use Obama plan in the past and bomb them?
Are you incapable of following a thread?

Oh, I have little trouble following any thread, but I do have trouble following your logic as most of the time its either full of half truths or out and out lies to try to sway people to your agenda. For example you claim that the Immigration law will add 40K border agents when in fact it increases the number of border agents to 40K.

As far as the Senate rejecting the border fence I would suggest you do some further research and you will find that the Senate did later agree to building the fence among other provisions. Including adding 20K border agents.

Senate Approves Landmark Immigration Bill After Border Amendment Draws GOP Support

The Senate has approved the long-awaited immigration reform bill that creates a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants while imposing unprecedented new measures for border security. Fourteen Republicans joined a united Democratic caucus to pass the bill by a vote of 68 to 32. It includes an amendment that radically expands enforcement along the U.S.-Mexico border, spending $46 billion to nearly double the number of border agents to 40,000, expand the use of drones, and construct around 700 miles of border fencing. The measure now faces an uncertain fate in the House, where Speaker John Boehner says he will not allow a vote without the majority support of Republican members.

What do you have to say to that hotshot?
We don't need the expense of 20,000 more border agents, sitting around waiting for people who are down to a trickle trying to enter the country, and creating more pensions.

We don't need 700 miles of fence.

We need the drones that should be coming home from Afghanistan.
 
Never mind the fact that it's easier to stop them from crossing than picking them up after they get here.

Do you lock your house's doors? Why? It's easier to call the cops after the bad guy's in your house, right?

This is desert expanse, correct?

C'mon. Use your brain. You can do it.
Do you lock your house's doors? Answer the question.

Yo, Synth -- why are you running away from this question?
 
Are you incapable of following a thread?

Oh, I have little trouble following any thread, but I do have trouble following your logic as most of the time its either full of half truths or out and out lies to try to sway people to your agenda. For example you claim that the Immigration law will add 40K border agents when in fact it increases the number of border agents to 40K.

As far as the Senate rejecting the border fence I would suggest you do some further research and you will find that the Senate did later agree to building the fence among other provisions. Including adding 20K border agents.

Senate Approves Landmark Immigration Bill After Border Amendment Draws GOP Support

The Senate has approved the long-awaited immigration reform bill that creates a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants while imposing unprecedented new measures for border security. Fourteen Republicans joined a united Democratic caucus to pass the bill by a vote of 68 to 32. It includes an amendment that radically expands enforcement along the U.S.-Mexico border, spending $46 billion to nearly double the number of border agents to 40,000, expand the use of drones, and construct around 700 miles of border fencing. The measure now faces an uncertain fate in the House, where Speaker John Boehner says he will not allow a vote without the majority support of Republican members.

What do you have to say to that hotshot?
We don't need the expense of 20,000 more border agents, sitting around waiting for people who are down to a trickle trying to enter the country, and creating more pensions.

We don't need 700 miles of fence.

We need the drones that should be coming home from Afghanistan.
Can we arm them?

The Border Patrol wants to.

Prediction: You will vehemently oppose this.
 
Of course we should arm the drones! What could possible be the downside of giving our government the authority to kill people on USA soil without a trial because they have alllegely committted a misdemeanor?
 
Oh, I have little trouble following any thread, but I do have trouble following your logic as most of the time its either full of half truths or out and out lies to try to sway people to your agenda. For example you claim that the Immigration law will add 40K border agents when in fact it increases the number of border agents to 40K.

As far as the Senate rejecting the border fence I would suggest you do some further research and you will find that the Senate did later agree to building the fence among other provisions. Including adding 20K border agents.



What do you have to say to that hotshot?
We don't need the expense of 20,000 more border agents, sitting around waiting for people who are down to a trickle trying to enter the country, and creating more pensions.

We don't need 700 miles of fence.

We need the drones that should be coming home from Afghanistan.
Can we arm them?

The Border Patrol wants to.

Prediction: You will vehemently oppose this.
Why would the drones need to be armed?
 
Do you lock your house's doors? Answer the question.

Yo, Synth -- why are you running away from this question?
People's doors aren't on the Mexican border.

For anyone whose door actually is on the US-Mexican border, I suggest they move.

Why are you afraid to answer this question?

You lock your doors so people you don't want to enter your home can't come in.

But you insist the nation doesn't need such protection, despite the numbers of people illegally entering.

How do you reconcile that dichotomy?
 

Forum List

Back
Top