SERIOUS question for all Trump acolytes on this forum....

[JusticeHammer]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

It is neither Barr's nor Mueller's job to exonerate Trump. That is the job of a jury of his peers.

Since there is no indictment, no charge and no trial, no exoneration is necessary. There is nothing to exonerate.

Something libtards don't understand.

So when trump said he was exonerated it was just another lie ,, Indictments already made and plenty more to come

Bullshit.

 

[deannalw]

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump....

Why is it that you think we care? Nothing in that sport will even come close to changing our votes in 2020.

^^^ poster boy ^^^

I would rather be a friend of his than a suicided friend of the Clintons.

Yeah, that's a lot of feeling suicidal when you shoot yourself in the back of the head a couple times.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Yes, Collusion
Even with redactions, the Mueller report contains ample evidence Trump and his campaign sought foreign help in 2016.
By ALEX SHEPHARD
April 18, 2019
Add to Pocket

Subscribe


Over the course of Donald Trump’s presidency, “no collusion” has become a mantra, rivaling only “Make America Great Again” as a motto and, at times, an organizing principle. The president and his defenders have uttered the phrase hundreds of times. For Trump, “no collusion” is a shield—proof the Russia inquiry that has dogged his presidency is a sham concocted by his perceived enemies: the Democrats, the media, and the deep state. The president’s public statements in the wake of Attorney General William Barr’s summary of the Mueller report and the release of the redacted version of the report itself have all centered on the inability to prove criminal conspiracy, equating that with an absence of any criminality or misbehavior.


Donald J. Trump

✔@realDonaldTrump

As I have been saying all along, NO COLLUSION - NO OBSTRUCT12:59 PM - Apr 18, 2019


The president and, particularly, his attorneys have gone to great lengths to narrow the definition of “collusion,” which is itself not a legal term. In their hands, only a proven conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials—a stated and agreed upon quid pro quo in advance of any illegal conduct—could qualify as collusion. Mueller’s team’s inability to find proof of that conspiracy, in Team Trump’s opinion, is all they need to show that the president has been completely exonerated. For the “Russia thing,” as Trump has called it, to be real, the special counsel would have had to prove this level of criminal coordination.

The text of the Mueller report, however, offers a very different picture. While an improbable smoking gun showing an agreed upon deal between the Trump campaign and Russian officials has not been produced, the report—even with all its redactions—is full of instances in which Trump and a number of his aides, advisers, and family members are talking with figures linked in various ways to Russia. These conversations broadly fall into two disquieting categories: what the hacked information being disseminated by WikiLeaks might contain; and what Russia, its officials, operatives, or cutouts could do for the campaign. Even without clear evidence of criminal conspiracy, there’s plenty of evidence of collusion in what amounts to a consistently damning portrait of a campaign welcoming—and egging on—election interference.

The Mueller report represents a clear narrative on interference in the 2016 election. Russia chose to intervene in the election in an effort to promote Trump and damage Hillary Clinton. The Trump campaign welcomed their help and encouraged it, both publicly and privately. Trump’s “Russia, if you’re listening” comment from July 2016 is presented as evidence in the report, as are more than one hundred interactions between campaign officials and figures with ties to Russia.

The Trump team “expected it would benefit” from the release of hacked emails. As soon as they became aware that WikiLeaks had in its possession stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, Trump and his associates began “planning a press strategy, a communications campaign, and messaging based on the possible release of Clinton emails by WikiLeaks” to press their advantage. In so doing, the Trump Campaign turned an influence effort from a foreign power into a key strategy for a United States presidential election. Over the course of 2016, moreover, Trumpworld figures repeatedly reached out to people with ties to Russia to inquire about future hacks.

The now infamous Trump Tower meeting of June 9, 2016 between Donald Trump Jr., then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya is case in point. That meeting was arranged after Trump Jr. had been told that the Russian government had “‘offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia’ as ‘part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.’” There’s no evidence that any information was passed between Veselnitskaya and the Trump officials at that meeting, but its existence points to the Trump campaign’s efforts to gain what it perceived as valuable information from figures with ties to Russia.

All the words and still looking like an idiot. Even mueller said no collusion you dumbass.

 

[deannalw]

#nopestillnocollusion

#leftyloonscrybigtears

#leftyloonsarepoopooheads

 

[Hale]

Yes, Collusion
Even with redactions, the Mueller report contains ample evidence Trump and his campaign sought foreign help in 2016.
By ALEX SHEPHARD
April 18, 2019
Add to Pocket

Subscribe


Over the course of Donald Trump’s presidency, “no collusion” has become a mantra, rivaling only “Make America Great Again” as a motto and, at times, an organizing principle. The president and his defenders have uttered the phrase hundreds of times. For Trump, “no collusion” is a shield—proof the Russia inquiry that has dogged his presidency is a sham concocted by his perceived enemies: the Democrats, the media, and the deep state. The president’s public statements in the wake of Attorney General William Barr’s summary of the Mueller report and the release of the redacted version of the report itself have all centered on the inability to prove criminal conspiracy, equating that with an absence of any criminality or misbehavior.


Donald J. Trump

✔@realDonaldTrump

As I have been saying all along, NO COLLUSION - NO OBSTRUCT12:59 PM - Apr 18, 2019


The president and, particularly, his attorneys have gone to great lengths to narrow the definition of “collusion,” which is itself not a legal term. In their hands, only a proven conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian officials—a stated and agreed upon quid pro quo in advance of any illegal conduct—could qualify as collusion. Mueller’s team’s inability to find proof of that conspiracy, in Team Trump’s opinion, is all they need to show that the president has been completely exonerated. For the “Russia thing,” as Trump has called it, to be real, the special counsel would have had to prove this level of criminal coordination.

The text of the Mueller report, however, offers a very different picture. While an improbable smoking gun showing an agreed upon deal between the Trump campaign and Russian officials has not been produced, the report—even with all its redactions—is full of instances in which Trump and a number of his aides, advisers, and family members are talking with figures linked in various ways to Russia. These conversations broadly fall into two disquieting categories: what the hacked information being disseminated by WikiLeaks might contain; and what Russia, its officials, operatives, or cutouts could do for the campaign. Even without clear evidence of criminal conspiracy, there’s plenty of evidence of collusion in what amounts to a consistently damning portrait of a campaign welcoming—and egging on—election interference.

The Mueller report represents a clear narrative on interference in the 2016 election. Russia chose to intervene in the election in an effort to promote Trump and damage Hillary Clinton. The Trump campaign welcomed their help and encouraged it, both publicly and privately. Trump’s “Russia, if you’re listening” comment from July 2016 is presented as evidence in the report, as are more than one hundred interactions between campaign officials and figures with ties to Russia.

The Trump team “expected it would benefit” from the release of hacked emails. As soon as they became aware that WikiLeaks had in its possession stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, Trump and his associates began “planning a press strategy, a communications campaign, and messaging based on the possible release of Clinton emails by WikiLeaks” to press their advantage. In so doing, the Trump Campaign turned an influence effort from a foreign power into a key strategy for a United States presidential election. Over the course of 2016, moreover, Trumpworld figures repeatedly reached out to people with ties to Russia to inquire about future hacks.

The now infamous Trump Tower meeting of June 9, 2016 between Donald Trump Jr., then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort, Jared Kushner, and Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya is case in point. That meeting was arranged after Trump Jr. had been told that the Russian government had “‘offered to provide the Trump Campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia’ as ‘part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.’” There’s no evidence that any information was passed between Veselnitskaya and the Trump officials at that meeting, but its existence points to the Trump campaign’s efforts to gain what it perceived as valuable information from figures with ties to Russia.

I'm assuming you didn't really read this article. If you had, you'd realize the clown you just made of yourself. First Shephard claims that "no collusion" is just a fabricated mantra and that Trump forced a redefinition of the elements of conspiracy that Mueller was unable to meet. He then hammers two totally debunked tinfoil hat theories: the Clinton emails, and the Tower meeting.

Honestly, are you trying to lower the standard set by nat4900 ? If so, congratulations!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

He didn't exonerate him, but he didn't flat out conclude he did anything illegal either.

It's time to MoveOn.org.
I do wish however, Dims try to impeach him. Our side could really use a rallying cry, and the best thing you can do for us is to try and take our guy out.

 

[edward37]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

It is neither Barr's nor Mueller's job to exonerate Trump. That is the job of a jury of his peers.

Since there is no indictment, no charge and no trial, no exoneration is necessary. There is nothing to exonerate.

Something libtards don't understand.

So when trump said he was exonerated it was just another lie ,, Indictments already made and plenty more to come

Bullshit.

Makes the flowers grow

 

[Andylusion]

Trump: 'Don’t believe what you’re reading or seeing'

Giuliani: 'Truth isn't truth'

Kellyanne Conway : "You're saying it's a falsehood, and they're saying Sean Spicer, our press secretary, gave alternative facts to that."

that's the world they live in.

But, they were right.

All the people on the left said this was going to be a smoking gun. They all said there was collusion. They all said Trump is a puppet of Russia, which there are people on this forum still saying it to this day.

They all said "here's the truth! Trump is (insert accusation after accusation)"

And now we know for a fact...... Truth isn't truth. Giuliani was right. 'Don't believe what you're reading and seeing', and Trump was right.

So you can say that's the world we live in.... because it's the world you live in too. Jessie Smollett anyone? Don't believe what you see and hear, because the left is full of liars.

oh bullshit.

the only reason mueller wrote a declination on 'collusion' was because 'documentary' evidence had been destroyed AND he couldn't get trump to do an interview. he didn't have enough to recommend charging him with conspiracy although itprobably would have gone that way. hence the obstruction... hence he wants congress to take it up per DOJ policy.

Really? I seem to remember an email server where the information was wiped by professional data wiping software, and that didn't stop you from saying Hillary was innocent, when her only 'alibi' was that she didn't know what classified information was... you know... after being in high office for decades she couldn't tell what was classified.

Now suddenly, because "the information was destroyed" is grounds to claim he was guilty? What information are we talking about? What document proving collusion did he destroy?

Hypocrites all of you.

 

[MaryL]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

I voted for Trump. Not an acolyte, it's like a big fuck you to mindless conformist liberalism... We can do better. All of us. Voting for a mixed race man back in '08 exonerated all white guilt? Really?

 

[Crepitus]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

It is neither Barr's nor Mueller's job to exonerate Trump. That is the job of a jury of his peers.

Since there is no indictment, no charge and no trial, no exoneration is necessary. There is nothing to exonerate.

"Well they aren't buying the "exonerated" thing, let's throw this against the wall and see if it sticks."


Hilarious!!!!

 

[Mike473]

It is all over. They took their best shot and came up way short. Trump will now dominate in 2020 and likely see the House back in GOP hands and the Senate majority increasing.

The Dems will pay the price for treating an innocent man so poorly.

 

[Crepitus]

Was Trump charged with something?

MORON......Under DOJ "guidelines" a president CANNOT be charged with anything. He is BEYOND the LAW.

If you read the report even an idiot like you would understand that Mueller is calling for Trump to be charged AFTER he leaves office.

He found nothing dumbass.

Read the report, don't just parrot Hannity.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

It is neither Barr's nor Mueller's job to exonerate Trump. That is the job of a jury of his peers.

Since there is no indictment, no charge and no trial, no exoneration is necessary. There is nothing to exonerate.

"Well they aren't buying the "exonerated" thing, let's throw this against the wall and see if it sticks."


Hilarious!!!!

I see your knowledge of the legal process is as thin as your knowledge of Christianity.

 

[Mike473]

Was Trump charged with something?

MORON......Under DOJ "guidelines" a president CANNOT be charged with anything. He is BEYOND the LAW.

If you read the report even an idiot like you would understand that Mueller is calling for Trump to be charged AFTER he leaves office.

He found nothing dumbass.

Read the report, don't just parrot Hannity.

No collusion. No obstruction. 2020 landslide inevitable.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

WFC’s? You assholes will just continue through 2024. He knows it, and can deal with it. He’s not a pussy dim. Too bad. I’m sure your illegals could have used some extra funding, or some welfare medical benefits. Could have bought a lotta cheese [emoji893].


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Crepitus]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

It is neither Barr's nor Mueller's job to exonerate Trump. That is the job of a jury of his peers.

Since there is no indictment, no charge and no trial, no exoneration is necessary. There is nothing to exonerate.

"Well they aren't buying the "exonerated" thing, let's throw this against the wall and see if it sticks."


Hilarious!!!!

I see your knowledge of the legal process is as thin as your knowledge of Christianity.

Just curious, what exactly do you think I was talking about?

 

[MaryL]

For all you liberal persons, nice job screwing this country over. Nice, allowing illegal aliens "sanctuary" nobody asked for or needed. Thanks for screwing the middle class burogosie , we never ask for you wealthy overlords dictating moral standards. Our wishes don't matter although we are 99 percent of America.

 

[Correll]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

They could not report a single instant of any Americans, let alone anyone in the Administration, colluding with Russia election "tampering" whatever wide all bullshit definition you use for that.


It was all bullshit and fairy farts.

 

[Hale]

For all you liberal persons, nice job screwing this country over. Nice, allowing illegal aliens "sanctuary" nobody asked for or needed. Thanks for screwing the middle class burogosie , we never ask for you wealthy overlords dictating moral standards. Our wishes don't matter although we are 99 percent of America.

These are excellent points, and ones I don't think the radical Left on this Forum realize. They want to pretend that their scream-at-the-sky antics and childish insults are the American norm, but if they were honest they'd know this just isn't so.

They act like they constitute a majority, but in fact I'm convinced they are just a tiny whining cult. They may have a few physical friends that join in their silliness, but I'm certain they are largely basement dwellers desperately seeking attention, and the rich overlords who egg them on in their constant gaslighting.

We see the incidents they cause - psychotic wackos that attack hats - but if there were really any significant numbers it would be obvious. "Antifa" is the closest, but even there they hide behind masks, accomplish nothing, and end up being shunned even by their own instigators.

So take note, edward37, nat4900, and others of your ilk: We're on to you. You're the mindless parrots of CNN word salad and you have no capacity for logical debate, as evidenced by your swift descent into base insults. You start a thread with a theory taken from your gods of Fake News, you fail to defend a single point in it, and you end up blubbering "orange man bad". You don't act like this in the real world, because you know you'd be slapped sillier if you did. We know, you know it, and the world knows it.

But please, don't stop. You're providing endless entertainment, and whether you know it or not you're sharpening the debate skills of the conservatives here. Why? Because when we see your ridiculous claims and conspiracy theories, we can't help but debunk them completely. We disdain the insult option you choose, and instead address the true issues. And each time we do that, we become more firm in our stance as Real Americans.

 

[JusticeHammer]

WHERE......for sanity sake......do you Trump acolytes that Trump was EXONERATED by the Mueller report???

Seriously, you can say that Barr "exonerated" Trump

You can say that Trump, exonerated Trump
You can say that KellyAnn has exonerated Trump
You can say that Hannity has exonerated Trump

BUT, when you state that Mueller has exonerated Trump you are either a fucking idiot.....You did not read the redacted report, or you're beyond sanity in discussing this issue...

READ THE DAMN REPORT and you CANNOT conclude that Mueller "exonerated" Trump.......

READ, COMPREHEND and LEARN, for God's sake.

They could not report a single instant of any Americans, let alone anyone in the Administration, colluding with Russia election "tampering" whatever wide all bullshit definition you use for that.


It was all bullshit and fairy farts.

Libs, especially on this board, lie and believe their own lies.