Lewdog
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #61
. OK, you want him to read and then debate you on the information you posted, but why can't you answer a few questions as pertaining to what you posted, and then your stance taken by you on the information in which might ignite the curiosity of the on lookers who might be taking your word for it or might take the word for your opponent by watching the debate ? Sometimes question's may spark other angles to look at during a debate between two debators on a story one may have posted. Links or stories are read if the visitor is convinced something might be there by the debate going on.Yes, Trump was in Concord for an event at 4:00 pm. But the plane in question departed Concord at a little after noon, while Trump was on stage at his event in Florida. There is no direct connection.Let this be a lesson. You can't trust everything you read on the Internet.Really? Where's your proof of that? Because that is exactly the opposite of the information in the article I posted.
Donald Trump’s Schedule 10-30-16 thru 11-5-16
Did you even read your own link? He was in Concord on November 3rd just like the article and information I posted shows. Trump was in 4 cities on November 3rd. From your own link:
- THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 03, 2016 – JACKSONVILLE, FL – Noon ET [Video]
- Donald J. Trump will hold a rally at the Jacksonville Equestrian Center
- THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 03, 2016 – BERWYN, PA – 2pm ET [Video]
- Mrs. Melania Trump will hold a rally at the Main Line Sports Center
- THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 03, 2016 – CONCORD, NC – 4pm ET [Video]
- Donald J. Trump will hold a rally at the Cabarrus Arena
- THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 03, 2016 – SELMA, NC – 7pm ET [Video]
- Donald J. Trump will hold a rally at The Farm
Again, you din't read the article. It specifically states that on the campaign trail often times some of Trump's campaign party would leave places at different times than Trump's plane. If you are going to argue with me on this stuff, especially an article I post with information in it, at least have the decency to read it first and quit wasting my time.
There is no debate when many of the questions asked can be answered just by reading the information in the link provided. If someone isn't willing to take the time to read the link provided for the discussion, why should I spend my time telling them the information they can get for themselves? It isn't about me convincing someone to read something... they either read it and then we talk about it, or they don't and move on. There is no reason for me to debate anything with someone that won't take the time to read the source material.