- Moderator
- #321
So? She is relevant to the issue…how exactly?The **** wore it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
So? She is relevant to the issue…how exactly?The **** wore it.
Yep, sicker than shit. And you can't do a damn thing about it! Must be a very impotent feeling.Sick puppy.
Whoosh.So? She is relevant to the issue…how exactly?
No, he/she/it doesn't realize that. Critical thinking skills are not in play. And probably never have been...ever.You realize that is the same rationale they give for forcing women to cover up in burkas, right? Men simply can’t control themselves so women lose rights in the process.
Yep, sicker than shit. And you can't do a damn thing about it! Must be a very impotent feeling.
Nice try. Thanks for attempting to participate. Better luck next time.I think you're the one who is compensating here.
One day before that miscarriage happens, someone murders the expectant mother and can be prosecuted for two murders. Hmmmmmmm.............Between ten and fifteen percent of pregnancies end in Miscarriages. That means there were at least 360,000 miscarriages in the United States last year. I say at least, because the provisional number on births was 3.6 million.
Those were not abortions. Those were people who wanted the baby, and were denied by fate, the great pumpkin, or God.
If those were people, the miscarried fetuses, who killed them? Who is responsible for that level of mass murder? Satan?
We find out who is at fault when someone dies in an accident. We insure nobody is responsible when someone slips and falls in the shower killing themselves. We investigate suicides to insure that nobody helped the person along. But we don’t seem to do that for miscarriages. Why not? Surely someone has to be responsible unless the baby committed suicide right?
I’ve asked this question a hundred times. And not once has any of the pro life people ever answered. A baby is born at four months. Can you make this person, this individual live? It is a person isn’t it? Surely it is able to live absent the mother isn’t it?
.....As you hold your ass that I just handed you.Nice try. Thanks for attempting to participate. Better luck next time.
No one killed them if it was a miscarriage. Do you honestly not understand the difference between something going wrong resulting in an unintended death, and someone DELIBERATELY killing someone?Between ten and fifteen percent of pregnancies end in Miscarriages. That means there were at least 360,000 miscarriages in the United States last year. I say at least, because the provisional number on births was 3.6 million.
Those were not abortions. Those were people who wanted the baby, and were denied by fate, the great pumpkin, or God.
If those were people, the miscarried fetuses, who killed them? Who is responsible for that level of mass murder? Satan?
We find out who is at fault when someone dies in an accident. We insure nobody is responsible when someone slips and falls in the shower killing themselves. We investigate suicides to insure that nobody helped the person along. But we don’t seem to do that for miscarriages. Why not? Surely someone has to be responsible unless the baby committed suicide right?
I’ve asked this question a hundred times. And not once has any of the pro life people ever answered. A baby is born at four months. Can you make this person, this individual live? It is a person isn’t it? Surely it is able to live absent the mother isn’t it?
I'm mostly agnostic on the abortion thing. Yeah, I'm not going to pay for the hood rat's first choice in birth control, but I see the rape/incest side of it too.
The problem is, this abortion thing drives the filthy fucking marxist animals absolutely nuts.... so, by definition, that makes me a YUGE pro-life advocate. Anything that fucks them over is good for America. Again, by definition.
So does the death penalty. So does discarding unused embryos from invitro fertilization. So clearly, the issue for most is not the loss of innocent human life.Removing a lung doesn't necessarily kill an innocent human being.
Abortion does. Always. That is its intent, and that is its effect.
You just wish you could get your skeezy hands close enough to my fine ass to be able to hand it to me!.....As you hold your ass that I just handed you.