Sexual child molester Josh Duggar had not just 1, but 2 Ashley Madison accounts...

[Statistikhengst]

Josh Duggar admits cheating on wife, addiction to porn

What an asshole. His wife is a sweet woman and don't deserve this shit. I hope she divorces his ass.

I read this morning that Duggar is blaming his wife for his own actions. Or she's blaming herself. Stupid assholes the lot of them.

Just reading that gave me brain freeze.


AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

 

[Statistikhengst]

Josh Duggar admits cheating on wife, addiction to porn

What an asshole. His wife is a sweet woman and don't deserve this shit. I hope she divorces his ass.

I read this morning that Duggar is blaming his wife for his own actions. Or she's blaming herself. Stupid assholes the lot of them.

I heard she's planning on staying with him.

That is just plain old sad. Sad, sad, sad.

 

[ChrisL]

It's really not very healthy to have that many kids for the woman. Of course, I guess you can live with those complications, but there will more than likely be some complications, like prolapsed uterus, peeing yourself, etc. Those are the minor issues. More serious issues can also occur.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Dudes a scumbag of the first order. Of course anyone who keeps the wife pregnant for the vast majority of her life can't be sane. That whole family is screwed up.

Really? They're all screwed up because you don't like big families? Sounds like you're the one with the problem.

Yes, the whole family. No family can function properly under that much pressure. It's impossible.

It's weird, that's for sure. Having that many children is just unhealthy for the mother. Honestly, I'm surprised her uterus hasn't fallen out yet.

I agree with you that that is a lot of children. But some mothers have a gift for childbearing, love to do it and are especially good at raising a large family. My hat off to them.

JS Bach had over 22 kids, but with three different wives, because unfortunately, during the brutal 30-years war, his first two wives died. The huge Bach clan left an indelible musical mark on our world and made our world a better place.

So, I'm not against really large families at all. They CAN be a blessing.

But this family, with this kind of history of sexual abuse....? No way.

I'm sorry, but I think anyone who wants to have THAT many children must be a little bit of a whackadoodle.

Back in Bach's day, it was par for the course and the assumption was that a certain number of children would not survive the first few years.

I know two really wonderful Catholic families from the West Coast, they each have 11 or 12 kids in the family, well raised, respectful, excelling in their studies, mom and pop work their asses off, the whole nine yards.

 

[MarcATL]

i bet the OP voting for Clinton....

Still whacking off for jesus ninja007

Still wacking off for The DNC?

Nevermind that BlueGin, why are you ignoring my direct question to you about your being so upset over this topic?

What seems to be the problem?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[pinqy]

Dudes a scumbag of the first order. Of course anyone who keeps the wife pregnant for the vast majority of her life can't be sane. That whole family is screwed up.

Really? They're all screwed up because you don't like big families? Sounds like you're the one with the problem.

Yes, the whole family. No family can function properly under that much pressure. It's impossible.

It's weird, that's for sure. Having that many children is just unhealthy for the mother. Honestly, I'm surprised her uterus hasn't fallen out yet.

I agree with you that that is a lot of children. But some mothers have a gift for childbearing, love to do it and are especially good at raising a large family. My hat off to them.

JS Bach had over 22 kids, but with three different wives, because unfortunately, during the brutal 30-years war, his first two wives died. The huge Bach clan left an indelible musical mark on our world and made our world a better place.

So, I'm not against really large families at all. They CAN be a blessing.

But this family, with this kind of history of sexual abuse....? No way.

I'm sorry, but I think anyone who wants to have THAT many children must be a little bit of a whackadoodle.

Their philosophy is that they'll have as many children as God wants them to have. So maybe it's God that's a litle whackadoodle.

 

[ChrisL]

Really? They're all screwed up because you don't like big families? Sounds like you're the one with the problem.

Yes, the whole family. No family can function properly under that much pressure. It's impossible.

It's weird, that's for sure. Having that many children is just unhealthy for the mother. Honestly, I'm surprised her uterus hasn't fallen out yet.

I agree with you that that is a lot of children. But some mothers have a gift for childbearing, love to do it and are especially good at raising a large family. My hat off to them.

JS Bach had over 22 kids, but with three different wives, because unfortunately, during the brutal 30-years war, his first two wives died. The huge Bach clan left an indelible musical mark on our world and made our world a better place.

So, I'm not against really large families at all. They CAN be a blessing.

But this family, with this kind of history of sexual abuse....? No way.

I'm sorry, but I think anyone who wants to have THAT many children must be a little bit of a whackadoodle.

Back in Bach's day, it was par for the course and the assumption was that a certain number of children would not survive the first few years.

I know two really wonderful Catholic families from the West Coast, they each have 11 or 12 kids in the family, well raised, respectful, excelling in their studies, mom and pop work their asses off, the whole nine yards.

Whatever floats your boat. Not something I would ever want to do.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Yes, the whole family. No family can function properly under that much pressure. It's impossible.

It's weird, that's for sure. Having that many children is just unhealthy for the mother. Honestly, I'm surprised her uterus hasn't fallen out yet.

I agree with you that that is a lot of children. But some mothers have a gift for childbearing, love to do it and are especially good at raising a large family. My hat off to them.

JS Bach had over 22 kids, but with three different wives, because unfortunately, during the brutal 30-years war, his first two wives died. The huge Bach clan left an indelible musical mark on our world and made our world a better place.

So, I'm not against really large families at all. They CAN be a blessing.

But this family, with this kind of history of sexual abuse....? No way.

I'm sorry, but I think anyone who wants to have THAT many children must be a little bit of a whackadoodle.

Back in Bach's day, it was par for the course and the assumption was that a certain number of children would not survive the first few years.

I know two really wonderful Catholic families from the West Coast, they each have 11 or 12 kids in the family, well raised, respectful, excelling in their studies, mom and pop work their asses off, the whole nine yards.

Whatever floats your boat. Not something I would ever want to do.

I never felt the need to have a huge family, but have no problems with those who do, as long as they can support themselves and raise their kids well.

 

[ChrisL]

It's weird, that's for sure. Having that many children is just unhealthy for the mother. Honestly, I'm surprised her uterus hasn't fallen out yet.

I agree with you that that is a lot of children. But some mothers have a gift for childbearing, love to do it and are especially good at raising a large family. My hat off to them.

JS Bach had over 22 kids, but with three different wives, because unfortunately, during the brutal 30-years war, his first two wives died. The huge Bach clan left an indelible musical mark on our world and made our world a better place.

So, I'm not against really large families at all. They CAN be a blessing.

But this family, with this kind of history of sexual abuse....? No way.

I'm sorry, but I think anyone who wants to have THAT many children must be a little bit of a whackadoodle.

Back in Bach's day, it was par for the course and the assumption was that a certain number of children would not survive the first few years.

I know two really wonderful Catholic families from the West Coast, they each have 11 or 12 kids in the family, well raised, respectful, excelling in their studies, mom and pop work their asses off, the whole nine yards.

Whatever floats your boat. Not something I would ever want to do.

I never felt the need to have a huge family, but have no problems with those who do, as long as they can support themselves and raise their kids well.

I agree. I don't have any problems with them. I just think it's kind of weird. If that's what they want to do, and they have the means to do it, then it doesn't really affect me.

 

[BlueGin]

i bet the OP voting for Clinton....

Still whacking off for jesus ninja007

Still wacking off for The DNC?

Nevermind that BlueGin, why are you ignoring my direct question to you about your being so upset over this topic?

What seems to be the problem?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

I already answered that question at least twice. In one of the 5/6 threads on this topic. Go look.

 

[koshergrl]

I'm pretty sure statist maintains that watching porn makes men less rap-y.

I am quite sure that you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, you disgusting piece of shit.

You always take a topic and then, instead of focusing on the OP, which is about Josh Duggar and not about me, you get personal with someone whom you don't even know. It's your modus operandi and it won't work with me.

Even trying to associate me as a person in any way, shape or form with "rape" is walking dangerously close to a bannable offense. You will now be given the chance, in the presence of coyote, avg-joe and CK, to revise this statement. I strongly suggest that you do so.

You may think that you are being coy, but you are not, not in any way at all. You are just making yourself look like a complete fool.

Coyote
AVG-JOE
cereal_killer

You know I thought the PROPER action was to FLAG the comment and NOT I repeat NOT call mods out in OPEN thread.

Oh honey, that's just what the written rules are, lol. They only apply to some people.

 

[Statistikhengst]

I'm pretty sure statist maintains that watching porn makes men less rap-y.

I am quite sure that you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, you disgusting piece of shit.

You always take a topic and then, instead of focusing on the OP, which is about Josh Duggar and not about me, you get personal with someone whom you don't even know. It's your modus operandi and it won't work with me.

Even trying to associate me as a person in any way, shape or form with "rape" is walking dangerously close to a bannable offense. You will now be given the chance, in the presence of coyote, avg-joe and CK, to revise this statement. I strongly suggest that you do so.

You may think that you are being coy, but you are not, not in any way at all. You are just making yourself look like a complete fool.

Coyote
AVG-JOE
cereal_killer

You know I thought the PROPER action was to FLAG the comment and NOT I repeat NOT call mods out in OPEN thread.

Oh honey, that's just what the written rules are, lol. They only apply to some people.

Ok, you had your chance.

 

[BlueGin]

This should be good since we have had posters on this board call for actual rape on KG. Including putting it in the tags.

Interesting.

And they still post here.

 

[Moonglow]

This should be good since we have had posters on this board call for actual rape on KG. Including putting it in the tags.

Interesting.

Like gross me out to the max!

 

[BlueGin]

This should be good since we have had posters on this board call for actual rape on KG. Including putting it in the tags.

Interesting.

Like gross me out to the max!

It should. You are the company you keep after all.

 

[Ravi]

This should be good since we have had posters on this board call for actual rape on KG. Including putting it in the tags.

Interesting.

And they still post here.

No he doesn't. That Republican supporter hasn't posted in ages.

 

[turzovka]

Convert to what?

Convert to the acceptance that God is real and God is all that matters. To deny (imo) is void of all logic and reason.

Convert to the realization that nothing we do each day has that great of importance except to how it plays upon what the Church describes as “the four last things” --- death, judgment, heaven and hell.

Convert to the above with also the very important responsibility and desire of wanting those dear to you convert to the same quest or purpose for living.

 

[Statistikhengst]

This should be good since we have had posters on this board call for actual rape on KG. Including putting it in the tags.

Interesting.

Like gross me out to the max!

It should. You are the company you keep after all.

Not necessarily.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Convert to what?

Convert to the acceptance that God is real and God is all that matters. To deny (imo) is void of all logic and reason.

Convert to the realization that nothing we do each day has that great of importance except to how it plays upon what the Church describes as “the four last things” --- death, judgment, heaven and hell.

Convert to the above with also the very important responsibility and desire of wanting those dear to you convert to the same quest or purpose for living.

I already have a relationship to Ad-shem and don't need your preaching. Thanks, and have fun with your tonka toys.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Wow, this must mean that ALL Republicans and Married "Family Values" types are douchebags.

I've been learning about Absolutism from Liberals.

No, it means Republican's can no longer pretend to have the higher moral ground.