ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 53,507
- 54,270
- 3,615
Entitled self serving people like her need to be voted out of office.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Google is awesome
So, in other words, none of you losers could back up the story about Jackson declaring herself a queen. You're just repeating rumors from right wing hacks.
Obviously, the fact that you make up your most vicious stories about blacks and women is ... just a coincidence. It doesn't show anything about how you think. Really it doesn't.
Now, don't you have some other blacks and women to slur? Get cracking, Trumpflakes. The party commands!
Warren will be putting on her 'war-paint'!I Cannot wait for the day when Elizabeth Warren gets into a fight over a conservative that is in her seat.
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee once named 'meanest' member of CongressGoogle is awesome
So, in other words, none of you losers could back up the story about Jackson declaring herself a queen. You're just repeating rumors from right wing hacks.
Obviously, the fact that you make up your most vicious stories about blacks and women is ... just a coincidence. It doesn't show anything about how you think. Really it doesn't.
Now, don't you have some other blacks and women to slur? Get cracking, Trumpflakes. The party commands!
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee once named 'meanest' member of CongressGoogle is awesome
So, in other words, none of you losers could back up the story about Jackson declaring herself a queen. You're just repeating rumors from right wing hacks.
Obviously, the fact that you make up your most vicious stories about blacks and women is ... just a coincidence. It doesn't show anything about how you think. Really it doesn't.
Now, don't you have some other blacks and women to slur? Get cracking, Trumpflakes. The party commands!
The story is a fake !
Typical righty racist propaganda.
. You know why libs hate Melania Trump so bad ? It's because they figure she's one of them, and that's how they figure they know her. Yes how dare her trashy liberal self try and be the first lady right ?? LOLWho have I called a whore? I told you to shut your cow mouth. That was after you called me a cow! You are on team cow, the udder team!
Well, you can easily do a search for the word 'whore' and you'll find this little exchange:
Because, that poster is a psycho stalker.
You repeatedly called the poster a whore and someone even pointed it out to you. So, I'm not sure what moral high ground you can stand on if someone calls Melania Trump the same thing.
Because, that poster was attacking me and calling me names. Melania has never attacked you or called you names. Get it? Go ahead and call me a "cow" again though or racist or whatever name of the day you may have picked out.
PS: I can't believe you actually went and searched for a post of mine where I mentioned the word whore, and that was like 2 years ago to someone who had repeatedly attacked me.Good job. You are a real winner.
If you're against people being a called a whore when they aren't then you should stand by that. When you create rules and then your own loopholes to those rules then your word means nothing.
So, I gave you a reason why I called that weirdo psycho stalker poster a whore. Why do you think it is okay to call Melania a whore? What has she done to deserve this title?
Dear HappyJoy and ChrisL
I think there are two different contexts going on here
1. Referring to Melania Trump as a "whore" because she got paid to pose nude in photos that were promoted presumably for that reason. I thought they were mostly artistic but others saw them as for money and/or erotic use. So if those photos are seen as "whoring" oneself for money, that's where I could see that reference applying. That's one scenario, and I can understand both views; some ppl see it as whoring, some people see it as professional art or modeling work and not selling oneself for sex.
2. In the excerpt ChrisL was explaining she was talking dirt back to the person who started that first. Apparently in previous threads. So to be fair, the entire context should be considered. This doesn't seem to be sexualized but namecalling back and forth, so thats a second scenario.
note: I personally don't recommend fighting fire with fire to the point of pouring more gasoline on a grease fire, but other times it takes a bigger bully to stand up to one. I usually don't do well at that, and I prefer to de escalate. But if ChrisL response to another poster attacking her is to go on equal offense as the means of defense, that's a different context from calling MT a "whore"
I don't think it makes much sense to compare (1) and (2). They seem to have occurred for different reasons.
. You know why libs hate Melania Trump so bad ? It's because they figure she's one of them, and that's how they figure they know her. Yes how dare her trashy liberal self try and be the first lady right ?? LOLWell, you can easily do a search for the word 'whore' and you'll find this little exchange:
You repeatedly called the poster a whore and someone even pointed it out to you. So, I'm not sure what moral high ground you can stand on if someone calls Melania Trump the same thing.
Because, that poster was attacking me and calling me names. Melania has never attacked you or called you names. Get it? Go ahead and call me a "cow" again though or racist or whatever name of the day you may have picked out.
PS: I can't believe you actually went and searched for a post of mine where I mentioned the word whore, and that was like 2 years ago to someone who had repeatedly attacked me.Good job. You are a real winner.
If you're against people being a called a whore when they aren't then you should stand by that. When you create rules and then your own loopholes to those rules then your word means nothing.
So, I gave you a reason why I called that weirdo psycho stalker poster a whore. Why do you think it is okay to call Melania a whore? What has she done to deserve this title?
Dear HappyJoy and ChrisL
I think there are two different contexts going on here
1. Referring to Melania Trump as a "whore" because she got paid to pose nude in photos that were promoted presumably for that reason. I thought they were mostly artistic but others saw them as for money and/or erotic use. So if those photos are seen as "whoring" oneself for money, that's where I could see that reference applying. That's one scenario, and I can understand both views; some ppl see it as whoring, some people see it as professional art or modeling work and not selling oneself for sex.
2. In the excerpt ChrisL was explaining she was talking dirt back to the person who started that first. Apparently in previous threads. So to be fair, the entire context should be considered. This doesn't seem to be sexualized but namecalling back and forth, so thats a second scenario.
note: I personally don't recommend fighting fire with fire to the point of pouring more gasoline on a grease fire, but other times it takes a bigger bully to stand up to one. I usually don't do well at that, and I prefer to de escalate. But if ChrisL response to another poster attacking her is to go on equal offense as the means of defense, that's a different context from calling MT a "whore"
I don't think it makes much sense to compare (1) and (2). They seem to have occurred for different reasons.
They hate her because she makes Michelle look like a plow-pulling mule.. You know why libs hate Melania Trump so bad ? It's because they figure she's one of them, and that's how they figure they know her. Yes how dare her trashy liberal self try and be the first lady right ?? LOLWell, you can easily do a search for the word 'whore' and you'll find this little exchange:
You repeatedly called the poster a whore and someone even pointed it out to you. So, I'm not sure what moral high ground you can stand on if someone calls Melania Trump the same thing.
Because, that poster was attacking me and calling me names. Melania has never attacked you or called you names. Get it? Go ahead and call me a "cow" again though or racist or whatever name of the day you may have picked out.
PS: I can't believe you actually went and searched for a post of mine where I mentioned the word whore, and that was like 2 years ago to someone who had repeatedly attacked me.Good job. You are a real winner.
If you're against people being a called a whore when they aren't then you should stand by that. When you create rules and then your own loopholes to those rules then your word means nothing.
So, I gave you a reason why I called that weirdo psycho stalker poster a whore. Why do you think it is okay to call Melania a whore? What has she done to deserve this title?
Dear HappyJoy and ChrisL
I think there are two different contexts going on here
1. Referring to Melania Trump as a "whore" because she got paid to pose nude in photos that were promoted presumably for that reason. I thought they were mostly artistic but others saw them as for money and/or erotic use. So if those photos are seen as "whoring" oneself for money, that's where I could see that reference applying. That's one scenario, and I can understand both views; some ppl see it as whoring, some people see it as professional art or modeling work and not selling oneself for sex.
2. In the excerpt ChrisL was explaining she was talking dirt back to the person who started that first. Apparently in previous threads. So to be fair, the entire context should be considered. This doesn't seem to be sexualized but namecalling back and forth, so thats a second scenario.
note: I personally don't recommend fighting fire with fire to the point of pouring more gasoline on a grease fire, but other times it takes a bigger bully to stand up to one. I usually don't do well at that, and I prefer to de escalate. But if ChrisL response to another poster attacking her is to go on equal offense as the means of defense, that's a different context from calling MT a "whore"
I don't think it makes much sense to compare (1) and (2). They seem to have occurred for different reasons.
. You know why libs hate Melania Trump so bad ? It's because they figure she's one of them, and that's how they figure they know her. Yes how dare her trashy liberal self try and be the first lady right ?? LOLWell, you can easily do a search for the word 'whore' and you'll find this little exchange:
You repeatedly called the poster a whore and someone even pointed it out to you. So, I'm not sure what moral high ground you can stand on if someone calls Melania Trump the same thing.
Because, that poster was attacking me and calling me names. Melania has never attacked you or called you names. Get it? Go ahead and call me a "cow" again though or racist or whatever name of the day you may have picked out.
PS: I can't believe you actually went and searched for a post of mine where I mentioned the word whore, and that was like 2 years ago to someone who had repeatedly attacked me.Good job. You are a real winner.
If you're against people being a called a whore when they aren't then you should stand by that. When you create rules and then your own loopholes to those rules then your word means nothing.
So, I gave you a reason why I called that weirdo psycho stalker poster a whore. Why do you think it is okay to call Melania a whore? What has she done to deserve this title?
Dear HappyJoy and ChrisL
I think there are two different contexts going on here
1. Referring to Melania Trump as a "whore" because she got paid to pose nude in photos that were promoted presumably for that reason. I thought they were mostly artistic but others saw them as for money and/or erotic use. So if those photos are seen as "whoring" oneself for money, that's where I could see that reference applying. That's one scenario, and I can understand both views; some ppl see it as whoring, some people see it as professional art or modeling work and not selling oneself for sex.
2. In the excerpt ChrisL was explaining she was talking dirt back to the person who started that first. Apparently in previous threads. So to be fair, the entire context should be considered. This doesn't seem to be sexualized but namecalling back and forth, so thats a second scenario.
note: I personally don't recommend fighting fire with fire to the point of pouring more gasoline on a grease fire, but other times it takes a bigger bully to stand up to one. I usually don't do well at that, and I prefer to de escalate. But if ChrisL response to another poster attacking her is to go on equal offense as the means of defense, that's a different context from calling MT a "whore"
I don't think it makes much sense to compare (1) and (2). They seem to have occurred for different reasons.
Just what I figured... you chicken shit little pussy.Punching one of your socks would hardly be satisfyingWhy don't you try it, you snively little wise ass punk whigger?^ somebody spank the shit out of this crackaIt's amazing the entitlement this negro thinks she deserves. I bet the Obama's talked to their servants in the appropriately named White House all the time like this. This is why these type entities should never be put in positions of power.