Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have to side with the owner of the house. If the cops want to enter, they need a search warrant.
Not per the exigent circumstances exception, which was clearly in play during the search; theres no way to reasonably expect law enforcement to obtain a warrant under such conditions.
Moreover, law enforcement wasnt requesting to enter the home to search for incriminating evidence against the homeowner, but to search for the suspect.
Last, any property owner who believes his civil liberties were violated is free to file suit in court.
Exigent circumstances expired within an hour of the kid giving the police the slip when he left the hijacked SUV. Without a blood hound tracking a scent to a particular structure the police would need a warrant to enter an occupied structure and forcibly remove the occupants. I sincerely hope some one does sue and force a court decision on this abuse of power.
Not per the exigent circumstances exception, which was clearly in play during the search; theres no way to reasonably expect law enforcement to obtain a warrant under such conditions.
Moreover, law enforcement wasnt requesting to enter the home to search for incriminating evidence against the homeowner, but to search for the suspect.
Last, any property owner who believes his civil liberties were violated is free to file suit in court.
Exigent circumstances expired within an hour of the kid giving the police the slip when he left the hijacked SUV. Without a blood hound tracking a scent to a particular structure the police would need a warrant to enter an occupied structure and forcibly remove the occupants. I sincerely hope some one does sue and force a court decision on this abuse of power.
I wonder what the reaction would have been if Obama, sitting up in bed watching the whole thing on TV live while eating crisps, had called off the hunt for the suspects because they didn't have a warrant...or a bloodhound?
In a time of domestic terrorism, when its actually happening, a cop telling you to get the fuck out of the house, we are trying to kill a fucking bomber...well, I have to side with the cops.
OH AND FUCK ALEX JONES. He is sickening.
I have to side with the owner of the house. If the cops want to enter, they need a search warrant.
Do you expect the cops to wait to get 5000 warrants to search a neighborhood while a terrorist is on the loose?
Do you expect the cops to wait to get 5000 warrants to search a neighborhood while a terrorist is on the loose?
I expect them to follow the law. If they enter without a search warrant, unless the homeowner allows them in, they're breaking the law.
Do you not understand how that attitude can be counterproductive in terms of providing public safety?
We're talking about a terrorist, not someone engaged in ordinary criminal activity. Catching him as quickly as possible is in the best interest in every citizen around the country.
I wonder how long that little bastard would have remained hidden if there were no cops, but law abiding citizens had the freedom to own guns and were able to safely search their own property.
First off, they are allowed to own guns. What country are you talking about. Secondly, no cops and all the citizens armed and looking for one man is a great idea. Nothing could possible go.wrong.
Wow.
As it turned out, NEITHER scenario was necessary. The punk was outside the perimeter.
Clearly, neither having an armed state force or an armed mob roaming the streets is a very good idea. They ought to have treated it as they would any other criminal case, because there is a reason they treat other criminal cases that way; The law.
In a time of domestic terrorism, when its actually happening, a cop telling you to get the fuck out of the house, we are trying to kill a fucking bomber...well, I have to side with the cops.
OH AND FUCK ALEX JONES. He is sickening.
I have to side with the owner of the house. If the cops want to enter, they need a search warrant.
Not under those circumstances at that moment they don't.
I have to side with the owner of the house. If the cops want to enter, they need a search warrant.
Not under those circumstances at that moment they don't.
Care to cite the exception to the 4th Amendment that is in the Constitution?
I said it that day and I will say it again.
If anyone entered a house without a warrant for that house or without the permission of the owner/resident, they broke the law and should be prosecuted.
Exigent circumstances expired within an hour of the kid giving the police the slip when he left the hijacked SUV. Without a blood hound tracking a scent to a particular structure the police would need a warrant to enter an occupied structure and forcibly remove the occupants. I sincerely hope some one does sue and force a court decision on this abuse of power.
I wonder what the reaction would have been if Obama, sitting up in bed watching the whole thing on TV live while eating crisps, had called off the hunt for the suspects because they didn't have a warrant...or a bloodhound?
An aware citizen caught the kid, not the police manhunt. That alone should show you how wrong they were.
Why would it be impossible? I'm not saying it is a fake, but your source is shit. BTW you might find this useful. Than vs. then - Grammarist
Then, than, I gave up trying to learn the difference a long time ago. Guess I will just have to live with being grammatically illiterate.
A picture could be faked easily but a video? Seems unlikely regardless of the source.
In a time of domestic terrorism, when its actually happening, a cop telling you to get the fuck out of the house, we are trying to kill a fucking bomber...well, I have to side with the cops.
OH AND FUCK ALEX JONES. He is sickening.
In a time of domestic terrorism, when its actually happening, a cop telling you to get the fuck out of the house, we are trying to kill a fucking bomber...well, I have to side with the cops.
OH AND FUCK ALEX JONES. He is sickening.
I have to side with the owner of the house. If the cops want to enter, they need a search warrant.
Not per the exigent circumstances exception, which was clearly in play during the search; theres no way to reasonably expect law enforcement to obtain a warrant under such conditions.
Moreover, law enforcement wasnt requesting to enter the home to search for incriminating evidence against the homeowner, but to search for the suspect.
Last, any property owner who believes his civil liberties were violated is free to file suit in court.
Not under those circumstances at that moment they don't.
Care to cite the exception to the 4th Amendment that is in the Constitution?
I said it that day and I will say it again.
If anyone entered a house without a warrant for that house or without the permission of the owner/resident, they broke the law and should be prosecuted.
They should be shot by the homeowner.
Not under those circumstances at that moment they don't.
Care to cite the exception to the 4th Amendment that is in the Constitution?
I said it that day and I will say it again.
If anyone entered a house without a warrant for that house or without the permission of the owner/resident, they broke the law and should be prosecuted.
They should be shot by the homeowner.
Not per the exigent circumstances exception, which was clearly in play during the search; theres no way to reasonably expect law enforcement to obtain a warrant under such conditions.
Moreover, law enforcement wasnt requesting to enter the home to search for incriminating evidence against the homeowner, but to search for the suspect.
Last, any property owner who believes his civil liberties were violated is free to file suit in court.
Exigent circumstances expired within an hour of the kid giving the police the slip when he left the hijacked SUV. Without a blood hound tracking a scent to a particular structure the police would need a warrant to enter an occupied structure and forcibly remove the occupants. I sincerely hope some one does sue and force a court decision on this abuse of power.
I wonder what the reaction would have been if Obama, sitting up in bed watching the whole thing on TV live while eating crisps, had called off the hunt for the suspects because they didn't have a warrant...or a bloodhound?
I have to side with the owner of the house. If the cops want to enter, they need a search warrant.
Not per the exigent circumstances exception, which was clearly in play during the search; theres no way to reasonably expect law enforcement to obtain a warrant under such conditions.
Moreover, law enforcement wasnt requesting to enter the home to search for incriminating evidence against the homeowner, but to search for the suspect.
Last, any property owner who believes his civil liberties were violated is free to file suit in court.
Exigent circumstances applies when police believe that the people in the building are in imminent danger, that the people in the building will destroy evidence, or when they have reason to believe that a fugitive is inside the building and will escape if they do not get a warrant. Care to explain, in detail with case citations, how exigent circumstances allows police to force people out of their homes when they ask for a warrant, there is no possibility that there is any evidence being destroyed, and they can surround the house to make sure no one can escape? Or are you simply going to pretend you are smarter than everyone else?
Any cop that suspects someone is hiding in my house is free to get a fucking warrant.
I wonder what the reaction would have been if Obama, sitting up in bed watching the whole thing on TV live while eating crisps, had called off the hunt for the suspects because they didn't have a warrant...or a bloodhound?
An aware citizen caught the kid, not the police manhunt. That alone should show you how wrong they were.
Without the police manhunt, the kid wouldn't have had to run, or hide.
No citizens would have been looking out for him.
Should the cops have been called off after an hour...after the shootouts and the vehicle chases and the bombs thrown in the street?
Care to cite the exception to the 4th Amendment that is in the Constitution?
I said it that day and I will say it again.
If anyone entered a house without a warrant for that house or without the permission of the owner/resident, they broke the law and should be prosecuted.
They should be shot by the homeowner.
Did you really just advocate murdering cops who went into the homes looking for the 2nd bomber? REALLY????
BTW, for you Constitutional radicals..........the 4th amendment rulings does absolutely allow a warrantless entry into a home under "exigent circumstances".
- Imminent danger to the public
- Hot pursuit
Both of those are legal reasons for a warrantless entry. Both existed for the hunt for the 2nd bomber.
Exigent circumstances expired within an hour of the kid giving the police the slip when he left the hijacked SUV. Without a blood hound tracking a scent to a particular structure the police would need a warrant to enter an occupied structure and forcibly remove the occupants. I sincerely hope some one does sue and force a court decision on this abuse of power.
I wonder what the reaction would have been if Obama, sitting up in bed watching the whole thing on TV live while eating crisps, had called off the hunt for the suspects because they didn't have a warrant...or a bloodhound?
I wonder why you think Obama has the balls to do something like that.
Care to cite the exception to the 4th Amendment that is in the Constitution?
I said it that day and I will say it again.
If anyone entered a house without a warrant for that house or without the permission of the owner/resident, they broke the law and should be prosecuted.
They should be shot by the homeowner.
Probably the more correct process would be for the cops to let the bombers go so that they don't run the risk of hurting anyone's feelings or stepping on their rights without a ruling from the Supreme Court?
Not per the exigent circumstances exception, which was clearly in play during the search; theres no way to reasonably expect law enforcement to obtain a warrant under such conditions.
Moreover, law enforcement wasnt requesting to enter the home to search for incriminating evidence against the homeowner, but to search for the suspect.
Last, any property owner who believes his civil liberties were violated is free to file suit in court.
Exigent circumstances applies when police believe that the people in the building are in imminent danger, that the people in the building will destroy evidence, or when they have reason to believe that a fugitive is inside the building and will escape if they do not get a warrant. Care to explain, in detail with case citations, how exigent circumstances allows police to force people out of their homes when they ask for a warrant, there is no possibility that there is any evidence being destroyed, and they can surround the house to make sure no one can escape? Or are you simply going to pretend you are smarter than everyone else?
Any cop that suspects someone is hiding in my house is free to get a fucking warrant.
Wow, not even a week after the heroics of the cops, you right wing bastards are in full cop-hate mode again.
If cops show up at your home, without a warrant, and they have reason to believe a suspected terrorist or dangerous criminal is inside, and you refuse to step aside and demand a warrant...........prepare to go to jail for interference. Because you will.
Let the cop hate flow, right?
An aware citizen caught the kid, not the police manhunt. That alone should show you how wrong they were.
Without the police manhunt, the kid wouldn't have had to run, or hide.
No citizens would have been looking out for him.
Should the cops have been called off after an hour...after the shootouts and the vehicle chases and the bombs thrown in the street?
If the police could shoot straight he wouldn't have gotten away after they stopped him. LAPD might do a lot of lot of things wrong, but they would have had helicopters overhead the whole time, and he would not have been able to ditch the SUV without someone watching. One would think that BPD, the State Police, the FBI, ATF, and the National Guard would have been able to find one helicopter to reinforce the roadblock, thus eliminating the need to violate people's rights.
