RoccoR
Gold Member
loinboy, et al,
I think there is some confusion here.
I personally apologize if my commentary, in any way, appeared to be an attack on your character or integrity, and submit that such an interpretation on your character or integrity would be fallacious.
My intent was to make a distinction between the sources I cited and the source you cited; including the fact that the narrative has a comparative difference. One being a direct quotation from an official source, where the other cites an official source but is an interpretative argument.
Again, there was no personal attack on your reputation intended; and I appeal to the discussion group not to interpret it as such.
Very Sincerely,
R
I think there is some confusion here.
(OPEN APOLOGY)Ad hominems are not valid rebuttals.loinboy; et al,
I do remember this. And I believe I responded in Post #223
This is not an image of text from the UN Charter, but comes from the "Easy Guide to International Humanitarian Law." [The right to self-determination - IHL the Diakonia web-site is a Swedish NGO for international development cooperation, not a sanction UN site or any subdivision thereto.]
This is the text from the Charter. The Charter uses the phrase "self-determination" twice in the entire Charter (all 19 Chapters).
(COMMENT)Excerpts from the UN Charter: Keyword "self-determination" said:CHAPTER I: PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES Article 1
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
- To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
- To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
- To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
- To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
----------- AND ------------
SOURCE: Charter of the United Nations: Chapter I: Purposes and Principles
The Swedish NGO IHL (Diakonia) does have lawyers on staff. The express there opinions. But don't mistake them for citing an official position. They weave the law just like a carpet to fit their agenda.
It is very difficult to discuss this topic in a balanced and unbiased way. Even I, as hard as I may try to avoid it, show some signs of bias and pre-registered agenda.
I personally apologize if my commentary, in any way, appeared to be an attack on your character or integrity, and submit that such an interpretation on your character or integrity would be fallacious.
My intent was to make a distinction between the sources I cited and the source you cited; including the fact that the narrative has a comparative difference. One being a direct quotation from an official source, where the other cites an official source but is an interpretative argument.
Again, there was no personal attack on your reputation intended; and I appeal to the discussion group not to interpret it as such.
Very Sincerely,
R
Last edited: