Should Posters be Responsible for the Truthfulness of their Subject Lines, Even if they are Cut and Pasted from a "News" Headline?

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, not by reputable and notable agents. He is a sexual assaulter, a business criminal, and is involved in at least four trials. He is going to get juiced. Orange juice!
That's been proven in court to be a bunch of yadda, yadda, yadda. Most prostitutes do not kiss n tell, but some find ways to get more money than the thousands they earn per evening by lying their fucking asses off, and accusing their high-paying clients of crimes if they ignore their extortion demands. Extortion is like a crooked vice president who visits poor foreign aid countries and demands 30% of their USA Foreign Package money so he can finance his run for president with no holds barred, and then someone puts out a braggadocios video of the same vice president who braggs his buttooskie off for all the world to see. When he sees how much hatred that brings upon himself, he redoes the original video to be a family project that paints himself as an innocent bystander all the way to the bank. :cranky:
 
That's been proven in court to be a bunch of yadda, yadda, yadda. Most prostitutes do not kiss n tell, but some find ways to get more money than the thousands they earn per evening by lying their fucking asses off, and accusing their high-paying clients of crimes if they ignore their extortion demands. Extortion is like a crooked vice president who visits poor foreign aid countries and demands 30% of their USA Foreign Package money so he can finance his run for president with no holds barred, and then someone puts out a braggadocios video of the same vice president who braggs his buttooskie off for all the world to see. When he sees how much hatred that brings upon himself, he redoes the original video to be a family project that paints himself as an innocent bystander all the way to the bank. :cranky:
That been proven in court about sexual battery and financial business dealings. None of that is up for debate.

The cases in the other trial are based on good evidence, which has been shown in indictments and motions.
 
That been proven in court about sexual battery and financial business dealings.
The business dealings issue is quite dubious.I see the case getting overturned on appeal.
Ms Carroll just blew her credibility in court claiming when Trump 'raped' her, He screamed MAGA when He shot His wad.

The cases in the other trial are based on good evidence, which has been shown in indictments and motions.
All accusations unproven.
 
Some of you seem to have forgotten how to stay on topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top