CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,620
- 69,755
It's harsh and 18th Century but should traitors be hung?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but loss of all assets and forced to break rocks for the rest of their life.
Yeah, along with all the progs here. I'll pull the switch on the trap door.It's harsh and 18th Century but should traitors be hung?
Nah, I'd be satisfied with impeachment and conviction.It's harsh and 18th Century but should traitors be hung?
The reason crime is how it is, is precisely because we no longer treat crimes properly. Every criminal is thrown away and treated equally unless they are white collar criminals. They get vacations in day camps while everyone else gets tossed in a cell with no hope of rehabilitation.It's harsh and 18th Century but should traitors be hung?
There are no levels of Treason you either are a traitor or you aren't.Depends on the level of treason involved, and whether or not it seriously compromised any sources or missions. And, before any lethal action was taken, they need to stand trial before a jury of their peers. We can't execute people without a fair and just trial.
And, you have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they committed treason.
But, if they leaked something that compromised the military or assets we have overseas, and people died, then yeah, execute them after a trial.
Are you shitting me? The FBI made a deal with convicted traitor Robert Hanssen that his family would continue to receive a freaking pension as if he retired honorably. You can't even get the Military or the federal government to execute convicts who were sentenced to death. Army specialist cook Ronald Gray was sentenced to death in 1987 for a series of murders and is still languishing. We won't even talk about Maj. Nadal who killed a dozen of his on men more than ten years ago. Drain the freaking swamp before you think about hanging future traitors.