francoHFW
Diamond Member
- Sep 5, 2011
- 79,271
- 9,399
No, it's based on a huge pile of Pubcrappe, hater dupe.Pointing out unproven accusations of crimes that Hillary may, or may not have committed does equal hating women.You hate women too?If it was sent as unclassified and later classified by State, the problem isn't in the Clinton camp.
thats their story today, what will it be tomorrow when that is disproven.
I know you love the bitch, but get real, she broke the law by doing govt business on a private server and then destroying it. If there was nothing to hide, why destroy it? Will these idiots ever learn that its the cover up that brings them down?
Maybe if you got laid more often you'd become a moderate conservative
How does pointing out Hillary's crimes equal.hating women?
The fact that Hillary is a woman...is irrelevant
Redfish thinks feminine terms are an insult to a male, which means women are inferior to him. If women were equal, being called a woman, if you're a man, is not an insult.
You're crazy. It has nothing to do with her sex, or obama's race. It has to do with corruption, lying, and incompetence. The same things would be said about them if they were both lilley white men.
I hate to inform you, but all criticism of dems is not based on race or sex. That is just another dem/lib failed talking point, the american people see through your bullshit.
How many Clinton "scandals" actually happened? ONE silly girl throwing herself at Bill.
Breaking for chumps- It's now PROVED that Hillary neither sent nor received any documents marked classified, etc. Change the gd channel.Corporate media is barely better.