Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
There is no way to "prove" that Russia's Wikileaks shenanigans got Trump elected. We can be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs without jumping to the conclusion that it actually altered the election.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
If you notice, there is no evidence Russia was involved at all.
There may NEVER be any hard evidence that Russia was involved in sabotaging the DNC....good hackers with lots of money can hide their deeds rather well......What there may be is spies, turncoats and informants that make allegations....that is the world of espionage....HOWEVER, according to right wingers (like you) when outfits such as the CIA or FBI or DEA, et al state something that does NOT fit your right wing agenda, then you want the intelligence to be written on tablets like the 10 commandments.
Live with your hypocrisy.....
I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
You aren't liberal. You're a paid to post troll.
Yeah, my check is a bit late....Can you advance me a few bucks?????
(What an)
I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
There is no way to "prove" that Russia's Wikileaks shenanigans got Trump elected. We can be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs without jumping to the conclusion that it actually altered the election.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
This isn't about "letting bygones be bygones." But imo, it is going too far to bring the outcome of the election into it.
Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.I know that there are other threads tangential on this topic and that many of us on the left have also criticized the CIA and FBI (especially) for their political subjectivity.
Nonetheless, how should we feel if indeed it is strongly proven that Russia helped Trump win the election by sabotaging the DNC???
Should we let bygones be bygones? Or should we be outraged that a foreign government interfered in our domestic affairs?
Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
No not really, many voted for Hilary because they did not want to vote for Trump!
Hilary moved far left in order to compete with Sanders..
Remember now the far left pushed Hilary aside in 2008 to push a half white man for president!
The far left rules the party, no matter how anyone wants to spin it!
Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
No not really, many voted for Hilary because they did not want to vote for Trump!
Hilary moved far left in order to compete with Sanders..
Remember now the far left pushed Hilary aside in 2008 to push a half white man for president!
The far left rules the party, no matter how anyone wants to spin it!
She didn't move that far to the left. She is right wing.
Except foreign policy and economics...Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.Yes you far left drones were defeated big time, now it is time for you to grow and admit your own religious beliefs have been false and you followed your false prophets into the destruction of your party!
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
Except foreign policy and economics...Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
It is a false narrative that the far left rules the Democratic Party. It is establishment Democrats that rule the Democratic Party, and the large majority of them are neoliberals and neoliberals (Both Republican neoliberals and Democratic neoliberals) are despised by the far left.Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.I think you are confused. Those on the far left absolutely hate Hillary Clinton. Probably even more than you do.
No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
No not really, many voted for Hilary because they did not want to vote for Trump!
Hilary moved far left in order to compete with Sanders..
Remember now the far left pushed Hilary aside in 2008 to push a half white man for president!
The far left rules the party, no matter how anyone wants to spin it!
It is a false narrative that the far left rules the Democratic Party. It is establishment Democrats that rule the Democratic Party, and the large majority of them are neoliberals and neoliberals (Both Republican neoliberals and Democratic neoliberals) are despised by the far left.Sure, some of the far left voted for Hillary, but the numbers are small. Hillary supporters, from what I can tell, are extremely moderate and tend to focus mainly on social issues and identity politics while ignoring foreign policy and economics.I disagree but it depends on what your definition of far left is. I consider Clinton to be slightly right of center. I really see no difference between her and say, Jeb Bush, aside from a few social issues. And if you look at Clinton's record, she is pro big-business, anti-union and quite the war hawk. Those traits, of which I abhor, are traditionally Republican.No they still voted for her and they do not hate her as much as you would think!
If they truly hated her she would have only got 35% of the votes!
Yes tell that to FDR and all those FDR Democrats!
The far left voted mostly for Hilary! As the far left only sees two choices vote for their nominee or not at all!
No not really, many voted for Hilary because they did not want to vote for Trump!
Hilary moved far left in order to compete with Sanders..
Remember now the far left pushed Hilary aside in 2008 to push a half white man for president!
The far left rules the party, no matter how anyone wants to spin it!
CorpWatch : What is Neoliberalism?
