Shouldn’t Kamala Harris be Indicted for Encouraging BLM riots?

[Curried Goats]

At the very least, Kamala's cackle should be indicted.

See. It's all about feelings with these Snowflakes. Kamala hurts theirs.

 

[BlindBoo]

So…when Al Gore wanted to audit FL counties to find votes that should have gone to him. Should he have been prosecuted?

Did he not go through the courts and accept defeat in the Supreme Court? He also presided over the Jan 6th Congressional Counting ceremony and the tradition of a non-violent transfer of power in the USA continued for another couple of decades........He didn't inspire a single riot when GWB won. He like all candidates with integrity, conceded and urged his followers to accept defeat and move on.

 

[BlueGin]

Did he not go through the courts and accept defeat in the Supreme Court? He also presided over the Jan 6th Congressional Counting ceremony and the tradition of a non-violent transfer of power in the USA continued for another couple of decades........He didn't inspire a single riot when GWB won. He like all candidates with integrity, conceded and urged his followers to accept defeat and move on.

Trump was following the same route AL did.

 

[BlindBoo]

See. It's all about feelings with these Snowflakes. Kamala hurts theirs.

Trumpy-flakes are special.

Trump was following the same route AL did.

Except when all his appeals failed he turned to more nefarious means that Al would never have considered. There was no slate of phony electors employed to subvert Fla.'s certified vote. Al didn't pressure the VP to reject Fla.'s Certified votrs either....course he was the VP......

 

[NotfooledbyW]

And why would these people be arrested?

To bail someone out, they have to first get arrested. That means they did more than just protest.

How long have you lived in this country? Have you ever heard of civil disobedience? Have you never seen a protester in America sit in the middle of the street and block traffic and stay there until the police gather, the non-resisting protester up and take him away to the police station where he or she is arrested often times requiring posting bail to get out.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Trump was following the same route AL did.

You are a liar. Gore challenged one state Florida, which would have decided the outcome of the presidential election by under 500 votes. It was not a claim of fraud. It was counting ballots that had the hanging chad errors. Gore followed the law and ultimately once the supreme court ruled in favor of Bush at one point, Gore conceded. He conceded graciously and said he did not want to cause the state of Florida and its voters not be counted in the presidential election.

The supreme court ruled against Gore and Gore respected the rule of law, and the finality of the supreme court decision.


In 2020 the Supreme Court ruled against trump, but instead of respecting the rule of law and the finality of their decision, Trump proceeded into embracing a vast criminal enterprise with his MAGA republicans, some holding high office, to disrupt the January 6, proceeding with the intent to win the election by committing fraud against an entire nation of voters.

If you had no false equivalence, you have no equivalence at all. There is no comparison between 2020 and 2000.

 

[Faun]

MAGA hate

A Texas woman faces federal charges for allegedly threatening to kill the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s election fraud case and a Democratic member of Congress earlier this month,” according to the outlet. “In a criminal complaint filed Friday, federal investigators say Abigail Jo Shry, of Alvin, Texas, left a voicemail on Aug. 5 threatening to kill U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan and Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX).”

“According to the complaint, Shry admitted to Department of Homeland Security investigators she left the voicemail, which began, ‘Hey you stupid slave’ followed kby a racial epithet and then proceeded to threaten to kill anyone who went after Trump. That list included Chutkan, Lee, ‘all Democrats in Washington D.C. and all people in the LGBTQ community,’ investigators wrote,” WUSA9 reported. “’You are in our sights, we want to kill you,’ Shry allegedly said at one point, later adding, ‘If Trump doesn’t get elected in 2024, we are coming to kill you, so tread lightly, b****.’”

Wonder which USMB poster that was?

 

[BlueGin]

You are a liar. Gore challenged one state Florida, which would have decided the outcome of the presidential election by under 500 votes. It was not a claim of fraud. It was counting ballots that had the hanging chad errors. Gore followed the law and ultimately one supreme court ruled in favor of Bush at one point Gore conceded. He conceded graciously and said he did not want to cause the state of Florida and its voters not be counted in the presidential election.

The supreme court ruled against Gore and Gore respected the rule of law, and the finality of the supreme court decision.


In 2020 the Supreme Court ruled against trump, but instead of respecting the rule of law and the firm Aliti of their decision, Trump proceeded in embracing a vast criminal enterprise with his MAGA republicans, some holding high office, to disrupt the January 6, proceeding with the intent to win the election by committing fraud against an entire nation of voters.

If you had no false equivalence, you have no equivalence at all. There is no comparison between 2020 and 2000.

Trump wanted an audit. Exactly the same thing.

 

[Godboy]

You are leaving out a few facts.

Trump did not encourage his followers to peacefully protest. That word appeared one time, in a multi-page speech full of incendiary language, certainly NOT emphasized…. and hours later, after watching it play out, he reluctantly, under pressure, tweeted.

Your attempt to link Harris to the violence of the rioters is laughably week. She encouraged people to donate to the Minnesota Freedom Fund which pays for bail and immigrations bonds for Minnesotans who can’t afford it.

What she said about protests has been clipped out of context a dead in response to a specific question, not about rioting, looting etc.

She also said:
“It’s no wonder people are taking to the streets and I support them. We must always defend peaceful protest and peaceful protestors. We should not confuse them with those looting and committing acts of violence, including the shooter who was arrested for murder. And make no mistake, we will not let these vigilantes and extremists derail the path to justice.”

Just wondering…where is her mob of supporters?

...and then she bailed out those looters and rioters. If the VP is bailing you out for those crimes, then she is saying it isnt wrong.

If Trump is being indicted for encouraging his supporters to protest peacefully, shouldn’t Kamala Harris be indicted for encouraging rioters by helping raise funds for their bail upon arrest?

In another example, she also said that protestors “should protest“ [the lie] about George Floyd being about police racism, while Trump said his supporters should make their voices heard - although he emphasized PEACEFULLY while Harris did no such thing.

And finally, the damage done during the Summer of Hate and Violence was much worse than the few hours on Jan 6.

Kamala Harris Lies About Bailing Out Violent Criminals

The vice president just openly lied about her involvement in bailing out violent criminals during the 2020 George Floyd riots.

thefederalist.com

"Should or shouldnt" no longers applies. The rule now is, whomever is in power will weaponize the DOJ.

 

[Faun]

It doesn’t matter, his words were inciteful. They could very well have incited someone to action. So, since inciteful words are bad…I expect you will demand action against joe for using them.

LOL

Of course it matters. If no one was incited, it wasn't as inciteful as you claim. It means people who heard it knew it wasn't a call for them to commit acts of violence. Obviously, you have no actual defense of Trump, but you want to defend him. So you throw out any red meat within your reach, which is weak whataboutisms that don't even apply.

But you did something. So here's your participation trophy.

 

[Curried Goats]

...and then she bailed out those looters and rioters. If the VP is bailing you out for those crimes, then she is saying it isnt wrong.

"Should or shouldnt" no longers applies. The rule now is, whomever is in power will weaponize the DOJ.

I guess it's too bad Trump was too much of a pussy to Lock Her Up!

 

[Faun]

Trump was following the same route AL did.

Oh? Which case did Trump file that he didn't withdraw?

 

[Faun]

Trump wanted an audit. Exactly the same thing.

No, not exactly the same thing. Gore did not request the initial recount in Florida. That recount was legally mandatory because the election in Florida was separated by less that 0.5%. Gore picked up over a thousand votes in that recount to bring the difference to 327 votes. He the followed state law at that time and requested another recount in several Democratic-led counties. That was granted. It was then Bush, not Gore, who first went to the courts. Bush filed a suit to stop that count.

What that amounted to was the entire election at that point came down to 327 votes in one state, which was finally decided by 537 votes when the Supreme Court stepped in and stopped the recounts. Gore conceded and that was that.

Compared to 2020 where Trump lost the election by tens of thousands of votes, spanning multiple states. Trump, like Gore, legally followed the laws of those states to challenge their results.

But unlike Gore, when that failed, Trump resorted to illegal means to steal as many as 7 states he lost. It's not legal to send fake electors, who represent the losing candidate of their state, and who were not certified by the state, to be counted in Congress on January 6th.

 

[Faun]

...and then she bailed out those looters and rioters. If the VP is bailing you out for those crimes, then she is saying it isnt wrong.

"Should or shouldnt" no longers applies. The rule now is, whomever is in power will weaponize the DOJ.

She bailed out no one, cretin.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Trump wanted an audit.

The USSC ruled that no audits were necessary because Trump lost and it was over.

 

[FA_Q2]

What type of conspiracy? Given all the anomalies with the halted count in the swing states and his belief that the election did not reflect the will of the people, he asked for a legal process.

What about what Gore did? He demanded, and got, a recount of specific areas in Florida that were majority Democrat in order to FIND more Democrat votes. He got the recount, but still couldn’t FIND the votes he needed. How come he wasn’t charged with the RICO act and put in prison?

read the indictment. It is all laid out there.

Those are the charges. You may not think he will be found guilty but that is immaterial to the thread which is comparing Harris supporting riots with Trump supporting riots.

Since you OP directly lies with "If Trump is being indicted for encouraging his supporters to protest peacefully" because Trump is not being indicted for encouraging his supports to do anything. He is being indicted on RICO for trying to illegally change the election.

 

[Staidhup]

You all just don’t get it, in todays America we have two different standards in the application of law, one for the Dimbo’s and one for the Pubs. Constitutional guarantees don’t apply to Pubs. Welcome to the world of the banana republic on steroids. Be careful the DOJ may come kicking down your door if you disagree.

 

[Billiejeens]

You all just don’t get it, in todays America we have two different standards in the application of law, one for the Dimbo’s and one for the Pubs. Constitutional guarantees don’t apply to Pubs. Welcome to the world of the banana republic on steroids. Be careful the DOJ may come kicking down your door if you disagree.

Coups matter.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

December 2020 - MAGA Racism for Jesus in action.

You are atheists, we believe in God.

Are you saying only Trump supporters believe in God? Or if you believe in God in America you must believe in Trump? •••• There are 8 Trump supporters protesting outside the Michigan Capitol trying to stop the sixteen electors from voting for Biden. ••••
1/2 a Trumper per Elector does not bode well for Tump’s fascist plan to overturn the election he had lost about 60 times now.

Trump resorted to illegal means to steal as many as 7 states he lost.

The GOP MAGA Fake Elector Criminal Enterprise was generally picked up on USMB well before the Jan6 coup attempt. See the first two posts and the “Godly” justification for disenfranchising black Biden voters from Detroit by fraudulent means.

 

[BlueGin]

The USSC ruled that no audits were necessary because Trump lost and it was over.

The USSC ruled against Gore’s audits too. Still the thing.