Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What part of take Obamacare and shove it up your ass don't you understand?
glad you agree.....however the rest of your talk doesn't seem to match...
It is called context.
Just because a religious institution serves the public does not mean the institution must become secular...
Just because a religious institution receives state aid does not mean it must dance to the secular tune...
Just beause a religious institution hires non-Catholics does not mean it must become non-Catholic in nature...
Sure, lets use state funds to serve the public in order to push a religious view.
What part of the 1st Amendment don't you understand?
p.s. thank you for bringing this conversation back to the OP.
They are not pushing a religious view...
they are not offering something that goes against their religious view.....
Sure, lets use state funds to serve the public in order to push a religious view.
What part of the 1st Amendment don't you understand?
p.s. thank you for bringing this conversation back to the OP.
They are not pushing a religious view...
they are not offering something that goes against their religious view.....
BS, fucking BS.
Are you for real?
link?
How many hospitals in MA qualify for this?
google is your friend, and i'm not your researcher.
So, you have a number?
Why does the Catholic Church want to control the sexual behavior of its parishioners?
Isn't what goes on in the bedroom of adults married to each other none of the business of clerics?
Why is so there so much concern with sexual matters by those who have taken an oath of celibacy?
Might the reason be very simple. Might the bishops and those who they report to care more about bringing more Catholics into the fold then about the health and well being of their moms (Since women play a minor and subservient role in church affairs)?
Wry scratcher would try to look back but the leash on him by the Statists is too tight...he can't see whom is holding it, and it gets yanked if he tries.Why does the Catholic Church want to control the sexual behavior of its parishioners?
Isn't what goes on in the bedroom of adults married to each other none of the business of clerics?
Why is so there so much concern with sexual matters by those who have taken an oath of celibacy?
Might the reason be very simple. Might the bishops and those who they report to care more about bringing more Catholics into the fold then about the health and well being of their moms (Since women play a minor and subservient role in church affairs)?
The only ones obsessed with 'controlling' others is your fucking halfwitted messiah.
Why does the Catholic Church want to control the sexual behavior of its parishioners?
Isn't what goes on in the bedroom of adults married to each other none of the business of clerics?
Why is so there so much concern with sexual matters by those who have taken an oath of celibacy?
Might the reason be very simple. Might the bishops and those who they report to care more about bringing more Catholics into the fold then about the health and well being of their moms (Since women play a minor and subservient role in church affairs)?
What part don't you understand....?
If Obama and the Left gets away with forcing Catholic institutions to become "secular".....the next thing will be to rip off all the crosses....
The First Amendment prevents to government from forcing its morals on U.S. citizens. It specifically prevents the government from interfering with the practices of any religion. . Is he insane or simply simple in the head?
Would the Federal Government intervene if a priest, rabbi or minister sacrificed a Bald Eagle in Yosemite National Park?
Would the Federal Government intevene if a priest, rabbi or minister chose to marry a five year old girl to an adult male on the shore of Yellowstone Lake, in Yellowstond NP?
Would Federal Officers ignore an orthodox Sikh wearing a kirpan upon entering the chambers of the HoR or the Senate?
Let's recap. Romneycare is great for the heavily Catholic state of Massachusetts, but Obamacare is wrong for Catholics.
Spin much?
(c) This section shall not apply to a subscription certificate under an individual or group medical service agreement delivered, issued or renewed under this chapter if that subscription certificate is purchased by an employer that is a church or qualified church-controlled organization, as those terms are defined in 26 U.S.C. section 3121(w)(3)(A) and (B).
General Laws: CHAPTER 176B, Section 4W
stupid much?
How many hospitals in MA qualify for this?
Certainly not Caritas Christi Health Care .
I have said numerous times times that I am against the mandate.
Try literacy.
Who the fuck cares if you are against the mandate?
This is not discrimination, no matter how badly you want it to be...
You're right - you're a broken record...
You want preferential treatment, not equal treatment.
No matter how many times I say this, it doesn't sink in.
Why does the Catholic Church want to control the sexual behavior of its parishioners?
Isn't what goes on in the bedroom of adults married to each other none of the business of clerics?
Why is so there so much concern with sexual matters by those who have taken an oath of celibacy?
Might the reason be very simple. Might the bishops and those who they report to care more about bringing more Catholics into the fold then about the health and well being of their moms (Since women play a minor and subservient role in church affairs)?
And Solar Panels...Next Obama will make the Amish get insurance that has these provisions in them.
Sure, lets use state funds to serve the public in order to push a religious view.
What part of the 1st Amendment don't you understand?
p.s. thank you for bringing this conversation back to the OP.
They are not pushing a religious view...
they are not offering something that goes against their religious view.....
If Catholics who work for Catholic-run organizations (which aren't churches, by the way) don't want to avail themselves of birth control* or birth control benefits under a health plan, they don't have to, and they won't be forced to do so. Non Catholics should have the option to avail themselves of birth control options just like other Americans do.
*I think that everyone understands that Catholics routinely use birth control, despite the teachings of the Church.
...on their non Catholic employees?
Churches are exempt from the ruling.
However, religious institutions that employ and serve people outside their faith -- hospitals, elementary schools, universities -- have to comply with the requirement to cover birth control if they offer health insurance coverage for employees. That means such Catholic institutions, which employ and serve wide swaths of non-Catholics across the country, will not be exempt, despite church teachings against use of contraception.
Obama Administration's New Contraception Rule Puts Key Catholic Vote at Risk
What gives the Catholic church (or any church, for that matter) the right to force their religious convictions on employees who aren't even catholic?
And the best of all birth control...don't...unless you are going to take on the responsibility of the possible end result...They are not pushing a religious view...
they are not offering something that goes against their religious view.....
If Catholics who work for Catholic-run organizations (which aren't churches, by the way) don't want to avail themselves of birth control* or birth control benefits under a health plan, they don't have to, and they won't be forced to do so. Non Catholics should have the option to avail themselves of birth control options just like other Americans do.
*I think that everyone understands that Catholics routinely use birth control, despite the teachings of the Church.
no one is saying they cant avail themselves of birth control and abortions..... the local drug store has condoms.. and a any doctor will write a prescription for the pill..... as with both... you just have to pay for them. The same for abortions.... go get one of you want one.
...on their non Catholic employees?
Churches are exempt from the ruling.
However, religious institutions that employ and serve people outside their faith -- hospitals, elementary schools, universities -- have to comply with the requirement to cover birth control if they offer health insurance coverage for employees. That means such Catholic institutions, which employ and serve wide swaths of non-Catholics across the country, will not be exempt, despite church teachings against use of contraception.
Obama Administration's New Contraception Rule Puts Key Catholic Vote at Risk
What gives the Catholic church (or any church, for that matter) the right to force their religious convictions on employees who aren't even catholic?
