Six Alinsky Rules That Explain Obama’s Words and Deeds

Notice how the left reacts when these tactics are used against them.

Rightwinger is fond of feebly claiming that Alinsky was a conservative, and the right uses his tactics as a matter of course.

Of course, @rightwinger's very username is a lie, so whattya expect?

Link where I ever claimed Alinsky was conservative

The GOP is losing young Christians - The Week

"Alinsky, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!"

That's the reverence many modern conservatives hold toward the late liberal organizer Saul Alinsky, whose book Rules for Radicals — which was dedicated to Lucifer — has become an esteemed political bible for conservatives hoping to learn from the left.

One example comes to us from John Hawkins, a conservative columnist and blogger who wrote an article for Townhall last year headlined "12 Ways To Use Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals Against Liberals." A tit-for-tat sample:

Libs throw a pie at a conservative author on campus; then we promise to shower every liberal speaker on the same campus with garbage. They post a conservative address online; we post two liberal addresses online. They hold a protest at someone's house; then we hold a protest at someone's house. They hit one of our politicians with glitter; we hit one of their politicians with coal dust


Very few Liberals today could tell you who Alinsky is. However he is constantly brought up in the conservative media as some arch villian who is lurking in the shadows. Ask a Beck viewer who Alinsky is and they all know.
Ask an Obama drooler who Alinsky is, and they all act out his pedagogy.
 
Notice how the left reacts when these tactics are used against them.

Rightwinger is fond of feebly claiming that Alinsky was a conservative, and the right uses his tactics as a matter of course.

Of course, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]'s very username is a lie, so whattya expect?

Link where I ever claimed Alinsky was conservative

The GOP is losing young Christians - The Week

"Alinsky, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!"

That's the reverence many modern conservatives hold toward the late liberal organizer Saul Alinsky, whose book Rules for Radicals — which was dedicated to Lucifer — has become an esteemed political bible for conservatives hoping to learn from the left.

One example comes to us from John Hawkins, a conservative columnist and blogger who wrote an article for Townhall last year headlined "12 Ways To Use Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals Against Liberals." A tit-for-tat sample:

Libs throw a pie at a conservative author on campus; then we promise to shower every liberal speaker on the same campus with garbage. They post a conservative address online; we post two liberal addresses online. They hold a protest at someone's house; then we hold a protest at someone's house. They hit one of our politicians with glitter; we hit one of their politicians with coal dust


Very few Liberals today could tell you who Alinsky is. However he is constantly brought up in the conservative media as some arch villian who is lurking in the shadows. Ask a Beck viewer who Alinsky is and they all know.


Thanks for admitting liberals are uneducated and haven't a clue who Saul Alinsky is, especially since he so impressed Hillary she wrote her thesis about him and his beliefs. It's Obama's hand book, of course they don't want the peasants to know about him. They want them to think they are brilliant and think this sh*t up on their own.

Give them a hand up, not a hand out!! They'll spend their lifetime taking care of themselves, what a novel idea.
 
Rightwinger is fond of feebly claiming that Alinsky was a conservative, and the right uses his tactics as a matter of course.

Of course, [MENTION=20321]rightwinger[/MENTION]'s very username is a lie, so whattya expect?

Link where I ever claimed Alinsky was conservative

The GOP is losing young Christians - The Week

"Alinsky, you magnificent bastard, I read your book!"

That's the reverence many modern conservatives hold toward the late liberal organizer Saul Alinsky, whose book Rules for Radicals — which was dedicated to Lucifer — has become an esteemed political bible for conservatives hoping to learn from the left.

One example comes to us from John Hawkins, a conservative columnist and blogger who wrote an article for Townhall last year headlined "12 Ways To Use Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals Against Liberals." A tit-for-tat sample:

Libs throw a pie at a conservative author on campus; then we promise to shower every liberal speaker on the same campus with garbage. They post a conservative address online; we post two liberal addresses online. They hold a protest at someone's house; then we hold a protest at someone's house. They hit one of our politicians with glitter; we hit one of their politicians with coal dust


Very few Liberals today could tell you who Alinsky is. However he is constantly brought up in the conservative media as some arch villian who is lurking in the shadows. Ask a Beck viewer who Alinsky is and they all know.


Thanks for admitting liberals are uneducated and haven't a clue who Saul Alinsky is, especially since he so impressed Hillary she wrote her thesis about him and his beliefs. It's Obama's hand book, of course they don't want the peasants to know about him. They want them to think they are brilliant and think this sh*t up on their own.

Give them a hand up, not a hand out!! They'll spend their lifetime taking care of themselves, what a novel idea.

Why should Liberals care who Alinsky was? He is OLD news

It is Conservatives who keep his memory alive
 
yep, the Shrillary is an Alinsky admirer...You people elect her we will have more of the same as with this horrible man now as President

the Democrat party of TODAY is not the old one back in it's day...Just look at all these elected democrats putting YOU THE PEOPLE down in this country...the NAMES they are calling you is outrageous...and now they are closing off YOUR COUNTRY to you to pay you back for not caving into their DEMANDS

it's has been taken over by, Socialist, progressives-commies

will people get a clue after Obama? who knows
 
Last edited:
The left uses the language without actual morality. Hence the word couch(to trick)
If the left really did have morals they would stop the Government hand outs that don't work for the poor and embrace the polices that do work.
This is how they get elected by the majority who actually have morals.

I would only disagree that the majorities these days are electing anyone based on choices like morality, and what is right. This past election shows us that it wasn't really about anything other than stuff. That and media control of the narrative.

Face it, we have a country where people don't follow things too closely unless it impacts them directly, then they get outraged. As a result we have a slew of voters that wait until a week before the election, then watch media outlets that are conspired to one side of the story, and they vote like the sheep they are.

They think they are in the popular opinion, but what they really are is duped lemmings.

That is exactly why Reid and Obama does not want to delay the Health Care.
People are finding out that what was promised was all lies.
 
Hehehehehe I have to laugh. Saul Alinsky was as Radical as they come, and he sure as H*ll wasn't conservative. Alinsky is as liberal as his most adoring worshipers, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
 
Good post

Seems like Republicans have embraced Alinsky

Only you would draw that conclusion.

It's Republicans that are the radicals.

They are continuing to do very radical and unprecedented things.

They are making Bush, who was pretty radical himself, seem tame.

pretty sad when some think that Congressmen simply doing their jobs is "radical".....

....unlike one radical President who actually won't do his job....who simply hides behind old man Harry....
 
Good post

Seems like Republicans have embraced Alinsky

Only you would draw that conclusion.

It's Republicans that are the radicals.

They are continuing to do very radical and unprecedented things.

They are making Bush, who was pretty radical himself, seem tame.

It's the Liberals in the Dem's party that are the radicals and took over in the 70's.
They shut down the Government several times, in over to force their legislation through, because they did not have the votes to get their campaign reform and abortion issues.
 
[MENTION=23262]peach174[/MENTION], it's the radicals of the 70s, the pot heads and LSD users that are running this country today. The liberal, free love, let me do exactly as I want radicals.
 
A simple Google of "Alinsky" shows 10 of the 13 firstpage entries are Conservative sites. The other three are Wikepedia and Amazon. None are from left wing sites

Alinsky is a rightwing boogeyman who the left gave up on 30 years ago
 
A simple Google of "Alinsky" shows 10 of the 13 firstpage entries are Conservative sites. The other three are Wikepedia and Amazon. None are from left wing sites

Alinsky is a rightwing boogeyman who the left gave up on 30 years ago

really? then why is obama following his rules to the letter?

why are you libs unable to see reality when it hits you in the face?

until you get over your blind love of your kenyan messiah, you will be unable to see the truth.

Seriously, RW, Obama is not a god, he is a flawed human. geez, you guys are sick.
 
Last edited:
A simple Google of "Alinsky" shows 10 of the 13 firstpage entries are Conservative sites. The other three are Wikepedia and Amazon. None are from left wing sites

Alinsky is a rightwing boogeyman who the left gave up on 30 years ago

then perhaps you would care to explain Alinsky's son's praise for Obama in the Boston Globe....?

For example, from “Rules for Radicals,” consider Alinsky’s words of wisdom for emerging community organizers:

[You must help] the people in the community…feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future. [An] organizer must shake up the prevailing patterns of their lives—agitate, create disenchantment and discontent with the current values, to produce, if not a passion for change, at least a passive, affirmative, non-challenging climate. [You must] fan the embers of hopelessness into a flame of fight.

These are the kinds of things Obama was reading when he poured through the pages of “Rules for Radicals,” and these are the kinds of things he would have been taught by the community organizers who trained him. And what have Obama’s tactics as President been to this point, if not tactics of playing one class against another to raise levels of frustration and of creating the very disenchantment about which Alinsky wrote, in order to nurture a passion for change?

Alinsky taught him well. And Alinsky’s son was the first to admit it, when he wrote a letter to the Boston Globe in praise of Barack Obama following the 2008 Democrat National Convention:

Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.
How Saul Alinsky Taught Barack Obama Everything He Knows About Civic Upheaval
 
A simple Google of "Alinsky" shows 10 of the 13 firstpage entries are Conservative sites. The other three are Wikepedia and Amazon. None are from left wing sites

Alinsky is a rightwing boogeyman who the left gave up on 30 years ago

then perhaps you would care to explain Alinsky's son's praise for Obama in the Boston Globe....?

For example, from “Rules for Radicals,” consider Alinsky’s words of wisdom for emerging community organizers:



These are the kinds of things Obama was reading when he poured through the pages of “Rules for Radicals,” and these are the kinds of things he would have been taught by the community organizers who trained him. And what have Obama’s tactics as President been to this point, if not tactics of playing one class against another to raise levels of frustration and of creating the very disenchantment about which Alinsky wrote, in order to nurture a passion for change?

Alinsky taught him well. And Alinsky’s son was the first to admit it, when he wrote a letter to the Boston Globe in praise of Barack Obama following the 2008 Democrat National Convention:

Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.
How Saul Alinsky Taught Barack Obama Everything He Knows About Civic Upheaval

Who cares?
 
Of course the left doesn't want you be believe he's using Alinsky's playbook. They want you to think Obama is a genius and thought this all up by himself.

He has learned well, that why he's stepping back and letting Scary Harry take the lead. He never takes the heat himself, he always has a fall guy. He doesn't know how to lead, he just knows how to find someone passionate enough to take over for him. ;)
 
A simple Google of "Alinsky" shows 10 of the 13 firstpage entries are Conservative sites. The other three are Wikepedia and Amazon. None are from left wing sites

Alinsky is a rightwing boogeyman who the left gave up on 30 years ago

then perhaps you would care to explain Alinsky's son's praise for Obama in the Boston Globe....?

For example, from “Rules for Radicals,” consider Alinsky’s words of wisdom for emerging community organizers:



These are the kinds of things Obama was reading when he poured through the pages of “Rules for Radicals,” and these are the kinds of things he would have been taught by the community organizers who trained him. And what have Obama’s tactics as President been to this point, if not tactics of playing one class against another to raise levels of frustration and of creating the very disenchantment about which Alinsky wrote, in order to nurture a passion for change?

Alinsky taught him well. And Alinsky’s son was the first to admit it, when he wrote a letter to the Boston Globe in praise of Barack Obama following the 2008 Democrat National Convention:

How Saul Alinsky Taught Barack Obama Everything He Knows About Civic Upheaval

Who cares?

obviously you don't.......that's why you spread lies........:evil:
 
Of course the left doesn't want you be believe he's using Alinsky's playbook. They want you to think Obama is a genius and thought this all up by himself.

He has learned well, that why he's stepping back and letting Scary Harry take the lead. He never takes the heat himself, he always has a fall guy. He doesn't know how to lead, he just knows how to find someone passionate enough to take over for him. ;)

It is the rightwing who is using the Alinsky playbook. They are the ones who are studying it

Can you provide a single quote where Obama ever mentions Alinsky? It was Gingrich who accused him
 

Forum List

Back
Top