Six year old exercises his Second Amendment rights

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Aug 4, 2009
285,303
158,318
2,615
The right to Bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
 
Last edited:
The right to Bear Arms shall not be abridged!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
What a stupid ass thread. Come on man, I realize you get paid to post, but you can do better than this.
 
The right to Bear Arms shall not be abridged!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
First, it’s infringed you fucking moron.

Second, did the 6 year old pass the background check?
 
The right to Bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
portsmouth...he's black. and you're a racist.
 
The right to Bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
Perhaps it should be illegal for a 6 year old to possess a firearm without a parental unit?
 
The right to Bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
If it wasn't for men like myself, and our guns, you'd never have even had the chance to post your hate and intolerance, let alone above attack upon the 2nd, which you hate and fear, likely because you are not allowed by law to exercise such! :auiqs.jpg:
 
The right to Bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
Beat the lil kid's ass (right in front of his momma and daddy if she knows who it is) until he can't sit down without a pillow and must sleep on his stomach. Prosecute parents, and/or adults in the kid's house for not securing weapons, and ban them all (including the little kid from ever owning fire arms.
 
Last edited:
The right to Bear Arms shall not be INFRINGED!


The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

The teacher, a woman in her 30s, was hospitalized, officials said.

“Her injuries are still considered life-threatening, but there was some improvement in the last update that we got,” the chief said Friday evening.

The chief said the 6-year-old boy will not be identified because of his age.
Had you ever been to this area you likely wouldn't have bothered post about it...you'd just ignore it like all the other intercity shootings.
 
This story is hinky as written. Something is being witheld, or something is deceitful in the way it is written.

This:

The shooting happened in a first-grade classroom, and the child and teacher, who knew each other, were apparently alone, Drew said at an evening news conference.

Ok, what the heck does that mean? If a child and a teacher are in a first grade classroom, why wouldn't they know each other? Why did that need to be stated?

Why were they alone in the classroom? That's a big taboo for teachers these days.

"The altercation was between a 6-year-old, the student, who did have the firearm, and the teacher, and then a round was fired," the chief said.

It was an "altercation?" How was it an altercation? Did the kid just pull out the gun and shoot the teacher all of a sudden? That doesn't sound like an altercation. Why did they say "who did have the firearm?" Why not say, he brought the firearm to school?

Then this:

Schools chief Parker said he'll look at upgrading the district's metal detectors, which can be activated for certain days, but which were not in effect full time at the elementary school.

What kind of metal detectors are they, that can only be activated "for certain days?" How were the "not in full effect?" What could that mean? They only detected certain kinds of metals? They only detected really large pieces of metal on some days?

This kind of tortured wording is for a reason. It isn't they usual sloppy writing of a public school grad who majored in journalism.

How did the teacher and the kid know each other? Was the teacher an abusive acquaintance or relative who happened to work at the same school one of his victim attended? Maybe a substitute, suprised to see one of their victims in the class? Was the teacher a groomer who finally touched the wrong kid?

Exactly the kind of detail the woke media would not want to report.

Maybe the kid did not bring the firearm to school, but somehow got ahold of it so they said "did have the firearm." Maybe the teacher showed the gun to the kid to scare them out of reporting them for grooming. Maybe the chief said it that way because he was embarassed by his intermittently working metal detectors.

Whatever it is, I look for this story to go away quickly.
 
Last edited:
Any six year old has the right to bear arms

Lets hear your deep thoughts. When I was 6, back in 1980, I learned gun safety, how to shoot a rifle and shotgun. Even took a 12 gage to school, walked through the halls with it and explained to the class about gun safety and how to clean a gun. No one freaked out, no one blinked an eye when I walked down the hall with a shotgun. How is it different from then and now? Just curious to see if you can identify it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top