Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 37,605
- 22,469
"Repub" lol You funnyThe Repub SC found no illegal act. Suck on that.
Haven't read the report huh? Why am I not surprised.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Repub" lol You funnyThe Repub SC found no illegal act. Suck on that.
False equivalence. Bad faith argument.Yet leaving the same kind of materials lying around totally unsecured in a garage doesn't bother you at all. Hypocrite.
The difference between Bidens case and Trumps case is that Trump actively tried to hide the documents and lied under oath about having them
No he didn't. Stop lying!
Your source is a partisan hackWill any of the details, most already known, marking the vast difference between Trump and Biden's cases be acknowledged by The Following? Not a chance.
Read it. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.337.0.pdf
True, whereas Trump was authorized to have and keep classified documents, Biden was not. Biden's crimes are by far the greater offense.False equivalence. Bad faith argument.
The SCOTUS takes a jackhammer to Smith's convictions. They will again.Prosecutors Reject Claims of Unfairness in Trump Classified Documents Case
Federal prosecutors on Monday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claims that he was unfairly charged with holding on to classified documents after he left office, saying that his case bore no comparison to the one in which President Biden was cleared of wrongdoing even though he was found in possession of classified materials after leaving the vice presidency.
In rebuffing what was known as a “selective prosecution” claim by Mr. Trump, the prosecutors said that while many government officials over the years had taken classified materials with them after leaving office — often inadvertently, but occasionally willfully — Mr. Trump’s case remained unique because of the extent to which he had “resisted the government’s lawful efforts to recover them.”
“There has never been a case in American history in which a former official has engaged in conduct remotely similar to Trump’s,” they wrote.
Prosecutors Reject Claims of Unfairness in Trump Classified Documents Case
Everyone should read this short filing by Smith. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.337.0.pdf
He explains the crimes Trump committed in trying to keep the government from taking possession of the classified material Trump stole.
“Most notably, Trump, unlike Biden, is alleged to have engaged in extensive and repeated efforts to obstruct justice and thwart the return of documents bearing classification markings. And the evidence concerning the two men’s intent—whether they knowingly possessed and willfully retained such documents—is also starkly different, as reflected in the Hur Report’s conclusion.”
https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...in his filing,conduct and not been prosecuted.
Will any of the details, most already known, marking the vast difference between Trump and Biden's cases be acknowledged by The Following? Not a chance.
“Once he realized he had them?”Biden immediately returned them once he realized he had them
Trump FOUGHT the return and lied about them to the DOJ
In no way was Trump authorized to “have and keep” classified (or national security docs in any form) after he left the White HouseTrue, whereas Trump was authorized to have and keep classified documents, Biden was not. Biden's crimes are by far the greater offense.
Just more witch hunt bullshit from the left.Prosecutors Reject Claims of Unfairness in Trump Classified Documents Case
Federal prosecutors on Monday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claims that he was unfairly charged with holding on to classified documents after he left office, saying that his case bore no comparison to the one in which President Biden was cleared of wrongdoing even though he was found in possession of classified materials after leaving the vice presidency.
In rebuffing what was known as a “selective prosecution” claim by Mr. Trump, the prosecutors said that while many government officials over the years had taken classified materials with them after leaving office — often inadvertently, but occasionally willfully — Mr. Trump’s case remained unique because of the extent to which he had “resisted the government’s lawful efforts to recover them.”
“There has never been a case in American history in which a former official has engaged in conduct remotely similar to Trump’s,” they wrote.
Prosecutors Reject Claims of Unfairness in Trump Classified Documents Case
Everyone should read this short filing by Smith. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.337.0.pdf
He explains the crimes Trump committed in trying to keep the government from taking possession of the classified material Trump stole.
“Most notably, Trump, unlike Biden, is alleged to have engaged in extensive and repeated efforts to obstruct justice and thwart the return of documents bearing classification markings. And the evidence concerning the two men’s intent—whether they knowingly possessed and willfully retained such documents—is also starkly different, as reflected in the Hur Report’s conclusion.”
https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...in his filing,conduct and not been prosecuted.
Will any of the details, most already known, marking the vast difference between Trump and Biden's cases be acknowledged by The Following? Not a chance.