🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Smoking Bans

Should Smoking be Banned in Businesses?


  • Total voters
    82
I am defending choice.

I don't smoke, do drugs, overeat, or drink too much.

That is my choice.

If some people smoke, do drugs, drink too much, eat too much etc those are their choices and are none of your business.

You have absolutely no right to tell other people what to do or how to live.


You are defending addictions and un healthy habits. But who cares. Right.

I am defending people's rights to make their own choices. I'm sure I could examine your life and find some unhealthy choices you make. Is that my business?



Define public space. I don't consider privately owned businesses to be public space.


Skull, is it true that you have no problem with drunk drivers either. I mean who are you to tell anyone that they shouldn't drive drunk? It's all about their "choice". Right?

Where did I say that? I will say I think DUI convictions should be based not on blood alcohol level but rather on actual levels of impairment. I've seen people who were under the legal limit not be able to drive well as well as people who were over the legal limit drive perfectly safely.

You are being purposefully obtuse about this topic. You and I both know that there are some activities that shouldn't be tolerated. Drunk driving. Public smoking. Extremely loud music in the middle of the night. etc etc.

You are being purposely thickheaded. Or maybe you can't help it.

What about drunk driving? Are you saying that the choice and freedom too endanger others lives by driving drunk should be tolerated. YOU know, its just a matter of choice.

Just like the loud music all night next door to you wouldn't be tolerated. Why is that? It's all about the choice isn't it?

Nah dude, you just want to pick and choose. You don't smoke so it's ok. You don't drive drunk but it's ok. Just don't keep you up all night playing that loud music. That's not ok.

Pick and choose.
 
You are defending addictions and un healthy habits. But who cares. Right.

I am defending people's rights to make their own choices. I'm sure I could examine your life and find some unhealthy choices you make. Is that my business?



Define public space. I don't consider privately owned businesses to be public space.




Where did I say that? I will say I think DUI convictions should be based not on blood alcohol level but rather on actual levels of impairment. I've seen people who were under the legal limit not be able to drive well as well as people who were over the legal limit drive perfectly safely.

You are being purposefully obtuse about this topic. You and I both know that there are some activities that shouldn't be tolerated. Drunk driving. Public smoking. Extremely loud music in the middle of the night. etc etc.

You are being purposely thickheaded. Or maybe you can't help it.

What about drunk driving? Are you saying that the choice and freedom too endanger others lives by driving drunk should be tolerated. YOU know, its just a matter of choice.

Just like the loud music all night next door to you wouldn't be tolerated. Why is that? It's all about the choice isn't it?

Nah dude, you just want to pick and choose. You don't smoke so it's ok. You don't drive drunk but it's ok. Just don't keep you up all night playing that loud music. That's not ok.

Pick and choose.

Define public space.

Is your home public space?

And what about drunk driving? I already told you my perspective on that. If you think people don't drive drunk just because it's illegal the you are an idiot living under a sense of false security.

If people exhibit impairment they should not be allowed to continue to drive.

That is a far cry from a privately owned business allowing smoking on privately owned property or a person engaging in what you deem to be unhealthy choices

If you can't see that then you are deliberately blind but that is your choice.
 
Wha...?

What the hell does "don't have a right to what they allow" even mean? :dunno:

It was a lot shorter originally, but then I just started adding stuff on. In hindsight, I probably should have revised it.
It means, why should a liberal lecture a conservative about defending rights while insisting businesses can't have the ability to choose what they allow in their establishment?

Where did anyone say that?

And before we go on with this allow me to state the obvious, in case others here don't know: you're FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. You don't have the first foggiest clue about the world of work. You're not even old enough to smoke.

Go on....

...And you play the age card. No surprise.
I believe you should take a long look at the poll. This 15 year-old obviously is of a like mind of more Americans- Americans who are old enough to be in the "world of work" and smoke- than you.
I may not be old enough to smoke or to do much else other than mow lawns and umpire baseball games, but I am old enough to understand what freedom is.
 
It was a lot shorter originally, but then I just started adding stuff on. In hindsight, I probably should have revised it.
It means, why should a liberal lecture a conservative about defending rights while insisting businesses can't have the ability to choose what they allow in their establishment?

Where did anyone say that?

And before we go on with this allow me to state the obvious, in case others here don't know: you're FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. You don't have the first foggiest clue about the world of work. You're not even old enough to smoke.

Go on....

...And you play the age card. No surprise.
I believe you should take a long look at the poll. This 15 year-old obviously is of a like mind of more Americans- Americans who are old enough to be in the "world of work" and smoke- than you.
I may not be old enough to smoke or to do much else other than mow lawns and umpire baseball games, but I am old enough to understand what freedom is.

Apparently you're not even old enough to understand what an "age card" is -- YOU are the one who misrepresented yourself and later admitted to being 15. Given that latter info, unless you're lying again, by definition you don't know the world of work. You may or may not know what smoking feels like but you just don't have the years of experience to judge either one in the real world --- which is where both matter. You're qualified to ask the question; how you yourself might answer that question has no meaning whatsoever except in the abstract.

Sorry but your opinion is worthless. As mine or anyone else's would have been at 15 on issues that only an adult could have the perspective to analyze. Pose the question, watch and learn. You're way too young to be entrenched in opinions that can't be challenged. That comes later.

You'll notice I didn't vote in your poll. That's because its scope is too limited to give me a choice. And that lack of scope is because you're too young to know the nuances and range of possibilities. Which is of course what the thread is for.
 
Last edited:
I'm a smoker myself and I support banning smoking near all business or government establishments. If there is even one person there who doesn't smoke, you are harming them by smoking around them. I don't support a ban on smoking in general, because it can be done without hurting anybody, and no victimless act should be illegal. The only businesses that should be exempt from the ban on smoking in businesses are those whose purpose is smoking, such as a cigar lounge, or a smoker bar/casino, where no nonsmoker would have a need or want to go.
 
Where did anyone say that?

And before we go on with this allow me to state the obvious, in case others here don't know: you're FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. You don't have the first foggiest clue about the world of work. You're not even old enough to smoke.

Go on....

...And you play the age card. No surprise.
I believe you should take a long look at the poll. This 15 year-old obviously is of a like mind of more Americans- Americans who are old enough to be in the "world of work" and smoke- than you.
I may not be old enough to smoke or to do much else other than mow lawns and umpire baseball games, but I am old enough to understand what freedom is.

Apparently you're not even old enough to understand what an "age card" is -- YOU are the one who misrepresented yourself and later admitted to being 15. Given that latter info, unless you're lying again, by definition you don't know the world of work. You may or may not know what smoking feels like but you just don't have the years of experience to judge either one in the real world --- which is where both matter. You're qualified to ask the question; how you yourself might answer that question has no meaning whatsoever except in the abstract.

Sorry but your opinion is worthless. As mine or anyone else's would have been at 15 on issues that only an adult could have the perspective to analyze. Pose the question, watch and learn. You're way too young to be entrenched in opinions that can't be challenged. That comes later.

You'll notice I didn't vote in your poll. That's because its scope is too limited to give me a choice. And that lack of scope is because you're too young to know the nuances and range of possibilities. Which is of course what the thread is for.

Because no one who isn't a working class 30-year-old knows nothing, right? He just got his ideas out of thin air because such is youth, right? What are your qualifications that a person has to meet before his arguments have merit? Dismissing an argument based on someone's age is logically fallacious and completely irrelevant.

A person doesn't need personal experience of a thing to have knowledge of it. If that were true, then everything you learned that wasn't from experience can't be trusted because you didn't personally experience it. You don't know that the Egyptians built the Sphinx, you weren't there. You don't know that Paris is the capital of France, you were never there.

If something has been proven true by multiple people, it can be trusted as fact without having experienced it. Experience is valuable, but by no means the sole definitive source of knowledge.
 
Where did anyone say that?

And before we go on with this allow me to state the obvious, in case others here don't know: you're FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. You don't have the first foggiest clue about the world of work. You're not even old enough to smoke.

Go on....

...And you play the age card. No surprise.
I believe you should take a long look at the poll. This 15 year-old obviously is of a like mind of more Americans- Americans who are old enough to be in the "world of work" and smoke- than you.
I may not be old enough to smoke or to do much else other than mow lawns and umpire baseball games, but I am old enough to understand what freedom is.

Apparently you're not even old enough to understand what an "age card" is -- YOU are the one who misrepresented yourself and later admitted to being 15. Given that latter info, unless you're lying again, by definition you don't know the world of work. You may or may not know what smoking feels like but you just don't have the years of experience to judge either one in the real world --- which is where both matter. You're qualified to ask the question; how you yourself might answer that question has no meaning whatsoever except in the abstract.

Sorry but your opinion is worthless. As mine or anyone else's would have been at 15 on issues that only an adult could have the perspective to analyze. Pose the question, watch and learn. You're way too young to be entrenched in opinions that can't be challenged. That comes later.

You'll notice I didn't vote in your poll. That's because its scope is too limited to give me a choice. And that lack of scope is because you're too young to know the nuances and range of possibilities. Which is of course what the thread is for.

Only adults have opinions that matter? That is completely ignorant.

Why should the youth who will have to run the country someday not be allowed to share their input?

And I am willing to bet if I was on your side instead, you would never have mentioned my age and would have have accepted my opinions. Am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
I'm a smoker myself and I support banning smoking near all business or government establishments. If there is even one person there who doesn't smoke, you are harming them by smoking around them. I don't support a ban on smoking in general, because it can be done without hurting anybody, and no victimless act should be illegal. The only businesses that should be exempt from the ban on smoking in businesses are those whose purpose is smoking, such as a cigar lounge, or a smoker bar/casino, where no nonsmoker would have a need or want to go.

I'm not going to dissect every piece of that, because it pretty much has by both sides earlier in the thread. I will however object to the last statement. My grandmother abhors smoking yet frequents the local casino.
 
...And you play the age card. No surprise.
I believe you should take a long look at the poll. This 15 year-old obviously is of a like mind of more Americans- Americans who are old enough to be in the "world of work" and smoke- than you.
I may not be old enough to smoke or to do much else other than mow lawns and umpire baseball games, but I am old enough to understand what freedom is.

Apparently you're not even old enough to understand what an "age card" is -- YOU are the one who misrepresented yourself and later admitted to being 15. Given that latter info, unless you're lying again, by definition you don't know the world of work. You may or may not know what smoking feels like but you just don't have the years of experience to judge either one in the real world --- which is where both matter. You're qualified to ask the question; how you yourself might answer that question has no meaning whatsoever except in the abstract.

Sorry but your opinion is worthless. As mine or anyone else's would have been at 15 on issues that only an adult could have the perspective to analyze. Pose the question, watch and learn. You're way too young to be entrenched in opinions that can't be challenged. That comes later.

You'll notice I didn't vote in your poll. That's because its scope is too limited to give me a choice. And that lack of scope is because you're too young to know the nuances and range of possibilities. Which is of course what the thread is for.

Only adults have opinions that matter? That is completely ignorant.

Why should the youth who will have to run the country someday not be allowed to share their input?

And I am willing to bet if I was on your side instead, you would never have mentioned my age and would have have accepted my opinions. Am I wrong?

Opinions? Everyone has one

Opinions based on life experience? Afraid not

Of course you can still have an opinion. But those opinions must be qualified by the limited life experience of a 15 year old
 
Apparently you're not even old enough to understand what an "age card" is -- YOU are the one who misrepresented yourself and later admitted to being 15. Given that latter info, unless you're lying again, by definition you don't know the world of work. You may or may not know what smoking feels like but you just don't have the years of experience to judge either one in the real world --- which is where both matter. You're qualified to ask the question; how you yourself might answer that question has no meaning whatsoever except in the abstract.

Sorry but your opinion is worthless. As mine or anyone else's would have been at 15 on issues that only an adult could have the perspective to analyze. Pose the question, watch and learn. You're way too young to be entrenched in opinions that can't be challenged. That comes later.

You'll notice I didn't vote in your poll. That's because its scope is too limited to give me a choice. And that lack of scope is because you're too young to know the nuances and range of possibilities. Which is of course what the thread is for.

Only adults have opinions that matter? That is completely ignorant.

Why should the youth who will have to run the country someday not be allowed to share their input?

And I am willing to bet if I was on your side instead, you would never have mentioned my age and would have have accepted my opinions. Am I wrong?

Opinions? Everyone has one

Opinions based on life experience? Afraid not

Of course you can still have an opinion. But those opinions must be qualified by the limited life experience of a 15 year old

Just out of curiosity, Rightwinger and Pogo, did you guys do things like this as a teenager? Try to stay up to date and involved in the world of politics? Or did you chase girls and play football and be a general teenage nuisance?
My bet is the latter. And as such, you believe someone of that age level is incapable of forming an educated and developed opinion or debating it with adults.
 
If mere health is the concern all businesses would have to allow marijuana smoking. After all haven't pro pot studies proven how beneficial marijuana smoke is? Certainly no one should be penalized for second hand health improvement.
 
I think I would weigh (a 15 year old) their opinion the same way I would that of anyone else I meet on a message board. Against my own 61 years of experience's. His opinions may get tossed, they may have merit. Interesting to see a 15 yo (IF that is fact LOL) engage in this type of opinion based, un moderated "debate".
 
I quit smoking a few years ago..

I still miss the act of smoking and how it relaxed me. I don't miss the smoke stink in my clothes, the bad breath, or the cough.

I would love to try an ecig, but am not quite sure of the health effects of it.
 
Only adults have opinions that matter? That is completely ignorant.

Why should the youth who will have to run the country someday not be allowed to share their input?

And I am willing to bet if I was on your side instead, you would never have mentioned my age and would have have accepted my opinions. Am I wrong?

Opinions? Everyone has one

Opinions based on life experience? Afraid not

Of course you can still have an opinion. But those opinions must be qualified by the limited life experience of a 15 year old

Just out of curiosity, Rightwinger and Pogo, did you guys do things like this as a teenager? Try to stay up to date and involved in the world of politics? Or did you chase girls and play football and be a general teenage nuisance?
My bet is the latter. And as such, you believe someone of that age level is incapable of forming an educated and developed opinion or debating it with adults.

I had opinions as a 15 year old. I thought I was as informed as any adult. I read the newspapers, news magazines, watched the news.

Today I look back at how I viewed the world and say.......Damn, what a dumbass

This quote from Good Will Hunting describes it best

Sean: You're just a kid, you don't have the faintest idea what you're talkin' about.

Will: Why thank you.

Sean: It's all right. You've never been out of Boston.

Will: Nope.

Sean: So if I asked you about art, you'd probably give me the skinny on every art book ever written. Michelangelo, you know a lot about him. Life's work, political aspirations, him and the pope, sexual orientations, the whole works, right? But I'll bet you can't tell me what it smells like in the Sistine Chapel. You've never actually stood there and looked up at that beautiful ceiling; seen that. If I ask you about women, you'd probably give me a syllabus about your personal favorites. You may have even been laid a few times. But you can't tell me what it feels like to wake up next to a woman and feel truly happy. You're a tough kid. And I'd ask you about war, you'd probably throw Shakespeare at me, right, "once more unto the breach dear friends." But you've never been near one. You've never held your best friend's head in your lap, watch him gasp his last breath looking to you for help. I'd ask you about love, you'd probably quote me a sonnet. But you've never looked at a woman and been totally vulnerable. Known someone that could level you with her eyes, feeling like God put an angel on earth just for you. Who could rescue you from the depths of hell. And you wouldn't know what it's like to be her angel, to have that love for her, be there forever, through anything, through cancer. And you wouldn't know about sleeping sitting up in the hospital room for two months, holding her hand, because the doctors could see in your eyes, that the terms "visiting hours" don't apply to you. You don't know about real loss, 'cause it only occurs when you've loved something more than you love yourself. And I doubt you've ever dared to love anybody that much. And look at you... I don't see an intelligent, confident man... I see a cocky, scared shitless kid. But you're a genius Will. No one denies that. No one could possibly understand the depths of you. But you presume to know everything about me because you saw a painting of mine, and you ripped my fucking life apart. You're an orphan right?

[Will nods]

Sean: You think I know the first thing about how hard your life has been, how you feel, who you are, because I read Oliver Twist? Does that encapsulate you? Personally... I don't give a shit about all that, because you know what, I can't learn anything from you, I can't read in some fuckin' book. Unless you want to talk about you, who you are. Then I'm fascinated. I'm in. But you don't want to do that do you sport? You're terrified of what you might say. Your move, chief.
 
Last edited:
I smoked for 37 years. The fact that smoking was banned virtually everywhere by 1993 was instrumental in my decision to quit. It saved my life. There are thousands like me, whose lives are being saved for the same reason. Lung cancer is decreasing dramatically. We have been slaves to the tobacco industry for too long. I would love to see laws prohibiting the growing and packaging of tobacco in this country. Now, we are poisoning the rest of the world...at a profit.

I worked for a company in Turkey that had a smoker's lounge. They had named the lounge after one of their beloved co-workers who had spent a lot of time there: he had died of lung cancer.

They did not see the irony.

That was 11 years ago. At that time it seemed like everyone in Turkey smoked. Cigarettes were a little over one dollar for 20. The US companies who produce cigarettes intensely market the products overseas. Many of those countries don't tax cigarettes or put warning labels on them. The attitude toward smoking in many countries is similar to what it was in the US in the 50s.
 
...And you play the age card. No surprise.
I believe you should take a long look at the poll. This 15 year-old obviously is of a like mind of more Americans- Americans who are old enough to be in the "world of work" and smoke- than you.
I may not be old enough to smoke or to do much else other than mow lawns and umpire baseball games, but I am old enough to understand what freedom is.

Apparently you're not even old enough to understand what an "age card" is -- YOU are the one who misrepresented yourself and later admitted to being 15. Given that latter info, unless you're lying again, by definition you don't know the world of work. You may or may not know what smoking feels like but you just don't have the years of experience to judge either one in the real world --- which is where both matter. You're qualified to ask the question; how you yourself might answer that question has no meaning whatsoever except in the abstract.

Sorry but your opinion is worthless. As mine or anyone else's would have been at 15 on issues that only an adult could have the perspective to analyze. Pose the question, watch and learn. You're way too young to be entrenched in opinions that can't be challenged. That comes later.

You'll notice I didn't vote in your poll. That's because its scope is too limited to give me a choice. And that lack of scope is because you're too young to know the nuances and range of possibilities. Which is of course what the thread is for.

Only adults have opinions that matter? That is completely ignorant.

Why should the youth who will have to run the country someday not be allowed to share their input?

And I am willing to bet if I was on your side instead, you would never have mentioned my age and would have have accepted my opinions. Am I wrong?

Because, once again he said, apparently to the wall, by definition of your age you cannot have had the experiences that give you the perspective to have any meaningful opinion. You've never been part of a workplace and you've never (legally) smoked in a public setting (and even if you did your age still prevents you from the same experience an adult would have). Therefore your perspective to know what any of it is like and means in the real world is, literally, nonexistent. Just as you're unqualified to meaningfully opine on aging or going bald. You can opine all you want, but it ain't worth squat.

And yes you're wrong, because your support would be meaningless. And you also never answered the question from last week when you went on this indignant know-it-all charade.

Do you ever see me opining in fora about photography or the stock market or motorcycles? You don't, and there's a reason: I don't have experience with them, which means I'm not qualified for anything more than asking an elementary question. And I'm not about to sit on the internet and pretend they are in my experience just to stroke my own ego and crow "look at me, I know shit". If I go in those fora at all it will be to learn something. In the same way, until you actually have experience in matters about which you're understandably curious, you need to be ASKING the questions.

I mean we don't get on a plane and put a 15-year-old who's never been in a plane in the cockpit just because he went on Wikipedia and found out what rudder pedals are.

(/offtopic)
 
Only adults have opinions that matter? That is completely ignorant.

Why should the youth who will have to run the country someday not be allowed to share their input?

And I am willing to bet if I was on your side instead, you would never have mentioned my age and would have have accepted my opinions. Am I wrong?

Opinions? Everyone has one

Opinions based on life experience? Afraid not

Of course you can still have an opinion. But those opinions must be qualified by the limited life experience of a 15 year old

Just out of curiosity, Rightwinger and Pogo, did you guys do things like this as a teenager? Try to stay up to date and involved in the world of politics?

I sure didn't. For one thing there was no internet. Electricity wasn't even invented until I was 28. If you wanted to document something you either got a chisel and a rock, or you were just on your own to memorize it. ;)

No I had no interest in politics. At your age I was interested in radios and building them and getting an amateur radio license. And I read a lot, but about topics that interested me, such as anthropology and history. And I started expanding my learning of musical instruments. Those, and simply surviving school and preparing to make my way in the world. Politics didn't really kick in (seriously) until about age 40.

I did smoke at 15, but I would never have puffed myself up, pun intended, to pass myself off as an expert on what the rules for people who could legally smoke should have been. At 15 I was in learn mode. And I've never left that mode. When you do that and declare you know everything, that's when you've stopped living.

(/offtopic)

PS
Ain't nothing wrong with chasing girls. The sticky part comes when one lets you catch her.

"You'll understand when you're older" :rofl:
 
I smoked for 37 years. The fact that smoking was banned virtually everywhere by 1993 was instrumental in my decision to quit. It saved my life. There are thousands like me, whose lives are being saved for the same reason. Lung cancer is decreasing dramatically. We have been slaves to the tobacco industry for too long. I would love to see laws prohibiting the growing and packaging of tobacco in this country. Now, we are poisoning the rest of the world...at a profit.

I worked for a company in Turkey that had a smoker's lounge. They had named the lounge after one of their beloved co-workers who had spent a lot of time there: he had died of lung cancer.

They did not see the irony.

That was 11 years ago. At that time it seemed like everyone in Turkey smoked. Cigarettes were a little over one dollar for 20. The US companies who produce cigarettes intensely market the products overseas. Many of those countries don't tax cigarettes or put warning labels on them. The attitude toward smoking in many countries is similar to what it was in the US in the 50s.

That's my general impression in the outside world too; this is one area where as a culture we're way ahead.

Smoking was everywhere in France when I lived there (in the '70s). I had actually quit before I went there, but since it's impolite to light up and not offer around, and since I was always in raucous company with wine constantly flowing, after declining for a long time I gave in. They were rolling their own, which I thought was kinda cool, so that was part of it.

I gave that up not long after returning Stateside and unlike a poster above I can't say I miss it or ever really "enjoyed" it. Once you do smoke and then quit, your four senses become five again as the olfactories come back with a vengeance. You can actually smell a smoker who's not presently smoking anything, at a distance, from the stench that's literally radiating off them. At that point all you can think is "wow, so I used to smell like that -- what was I thinking?" :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top