So Biden wants to raise taxes that Trump lowered... what can be the net effect???

[Dagosa]

Tax hikes mean less disposable income for people and will slow the economy.

Gee, history shows the opposite is true.....

 

[LeftofLeft]

Totally factless.
Jon Miltmore the author is a conservative smuck giving made up opinions. It’s nothing more then an opinion piece. What bullshit. The actual evidence in the piece worth noting is that ALL STIMULOUS PACKAGES should include monies for climate change mitigation programs. That is a fact that the feckless, irresponsible right in total ignorance can’t seem to wrap their heads around. It’s hilarious how the repugnants are so stupid, they can’t beleive the science of EVERY CLIMATE RESEARCH FACILITY IN THE WORLD, MAJOR CORPORATION AND GOVERNMENT AGENCY

The right is composed of unbelievably ignorant turds when it comes to facts and science. In their ignorance they reduce everything to made up shit about gender studies, which infantile repugnants should do well to heed. Women’s rights is going to kill them in the 22 elections.....they’re fking with the wrong gender. . What stupidity.

You smeared the author yet provided no fact-based counter to the $10 gender study in Pakistan, and touted that any and every package should fight climate change.

US Congress clears $25 million for democracy, gender programmes in Pakistan

The US Congress on Tuesday approved USD 25 million civilian aid package for Pakistan to strengthen democracy and promote women's rights in the South Asian country

www.business-standard.com

Coronavirus relief legislation includes $10M for âgender programsâ in Pakistan

The U.S. is engaged in multiple initiatives to help improve gender equality in the country.

www.foxbusiness.com

Coronavirus relief package contains tens of millions for 'gender' and 'democracy programs' in Pakistan

The recently agreed-upon coronavirus aid and 2021 government spending package contains tens of millions of dollars allocated for “gender” and “democracy” programs in Pakistan.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Billions in foreign aid, pet projects stuffed into COVID relief bill

Uncle Sam is about to play Santa for America — and the world. Congress passed a $2.3 trillion COVID-19 relief and government funding bill that gives just $600 to most Americans strugglin…

nypost.com

 

[LeftofLeft]

Still whining about Obama was taking too much time to rebuild the house that Bush burned down. Amazing. You don’t get it. Every time the GOP has their traditional recession, it puts the middle class farther behind with deeper indebtedness. No one increases the deficit like republicans who want everything for nothing. Obama first priorities were to save lives with Obamacare. The middle class lost their jobs and their employer based healthcare. Secondly, rebuild the tax base so you can afford this investment in the middle class by making the rich pay their fair share. It’s a broken record. Repugs cut taxesfor the rich, creat recessions and burn the house down.

Universal healthcare is a key buffer for the middle class......but without GOP fiscal responsibility we can’t keep up.

Obama delayed the recovery to take care of his friends, punish his enemies, and put into plan the fundamental transformation of America. He said so himself.

 

[DBA]

Well, there you have it. Blue states have higher average income, and they pay more property taxes. The cost of living is higher also for one reason…….capitalism. Businesses, whether it be for commodities or energy, the prices are higher. Hence, any sales tax, state income and PROPERTY TAXES are higher in blue states. Everyone pays property taxes. Either directly by taxation or indirectly through the rental costs to the property holder. Owners of rental property aren’t benevolent. If their federal income taxes go up because the can’t claim their property taxes on their income from rentals, they increase their rental fees. This should be OBVIOUS.

Taxes are higher in blue states because of Democratic polcies and regulations. It is a simple as that, but I don’t expect you do get it. They have brainwashed you to accept those high taxes and like it. Sad.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It didn’t slow down the rich when the highest effective bracket was 70%.

The rich pay a larger portion now than they did when the top rate was 70%.

 

[Dagosa]

The rich pay a larger portion now than they did when the top rate was 70%.

Wrong. More made up shit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Wrong. More made up shit.

Who Pays Income Taxes?

(pdf) It is a common refrain from some politicians that the rich are not paying their fair share of income taxes. This sentiment is echoed by findings from a Pew Research poll conducted last April, which indicated that a significant portion of respondents feel that wealthy individuals do not...

www.ntu.org

LOL! Bitch.

Less than 50% in 1980, over 70% in 2018.

 

[Dagosa]

View attachment 691192

Who Pays Income Taxes?

(pdf) It is a common refrain from some politicians that the rich are not paying their fair share of income taxes. This sentiment is echoed by findings from a Pew Research poll conducted last April, which indicated that a significant portion of respondents feel that wealthy individuals do not...

www.ntu.org

LOL! Bitch.

Less than 50% in 1980, over 70% in 2018.

View attachment 691193

More made up shit….Foolish. A conservative dufus print out by a conservative BS.
That only shows you what percent of the tax actually collected is by the rich.
The rich are avoiding paying tax ALTOGETHER, they don’t even appear in the chart of this bogus periodical. You are effin naive.

Richest Americans pay almost no income taxes, report finds

A report from ProPublica illustrated how wealthy people in the U.S. are able to avoid income taxes by keeping the bulk of their wealth in investments that have little or no taxes.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

More made up shit….Foolish. A conservative dufus print out by a conservative BS.
That only shows you what percent of the tax actually collected is by the rich.
The rich are avoiding paying tax ALTOGETHER, they don’t even appear in the chart of this bogus periodical. You are effin naive.

Richest Americans pay almost no income taxes, report finds

A report from ProPublica illustrated how wealthy people in the U.S. are able to avoid income taxes by keeping the bulk of their wealth in investments that have little or no taxes.

www.nbcnews.com

That only shows you what percent of the tax actually collected is by the rich.

Yeah, that was what I said, retard.

The rich are avoiding paying tax ALTOGETHER, they don’t even appear in the chart of this bogus periodical.

Even with all their evasion, they still pay over 70% of income taxes collected. WOW!

"Because of the realization requirement, as long as wealthy people hold onto their assets, they're not going to be paying taxes on their increase in wealth," he said in an email.

People don't pay taxes on unrealized, untaxable gains. Harumph!

 

[Dagosa]

That only shows you what percent of the tax actually collected is by the rich.

Yeah, that was what I said, retard.

The rich are avoiding paying tax ALTOGETHER, they don’t even appear in the chart of this bogus periodical.

Even with all their evasion, they still pay over 70% of income taxes collected. WOW!

"Because of the realization requirement, as long as wealthy people hold onto their assets, they're not going to be paying taxes on their increase in wealth," he said in an email.

People don't pay taxes on unrealized, untaxable gains. Harumph!

So it means NOTHING IMBECILE. RICH WHO DON’T EVEN PAY TAXES, DONT EVEN SHOW UP. You clowns have the math IQ of a mature cucumber. We already know you’re science illiterate.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So it means NOTHING IMBECILE. RICH WHO DON’T EVEN PAY TAXES, DONT EVEN SHOW UP. You clowns have the math IQ of a mature cucumber. We already know you’re science illiterate.

Even with all their evasion, they still pay over 70% of income taxes collected. WOW!

DURR

 

[Dagosa]

You smeared the author yet provided no fact-based counter to the $10 gender study in Pakistan, and touted that any and every package should fight climate change.

Yup. Because like all idiots, you make up shit. There is no corporation, country, military govt or research facility in the entire world that doesn’t 100% agree with me on climate change and every budget everywhere needs to devote a major portion to its mitigation. Only stupid, unqualified, ignorant say differently…..that’s you and the rest of the Humpers. I’m head and shoulders so much smarter then you on this issue, you’re opinion is totally irrelevant and you posts are a pack of lies.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Yup. Because like all idiots, you make up shit. There is no corporation, country, military govt or research facility in the entire world that doesn’t 100% agree with me on climate change and every budget everywhere needs to devote a major portion to its mitigation. Only stupid, unqualified, ignorant say differently…..that’s you and the rest of the Humpers. I’m head and shoulders so much smarter then you on this issue, you’re opinion is totally irrelevant and you posts are a pack of lies.

Keep up your insults, keep up your climate change pledge as there is an entire country that banks on people like you (China).

 

[basquebromance]

no one gave tax decreases like Trump...BIGGER THAN THE REAGAN CUTS!

 

[Faun]

Tax hikes mean less disposable income for people and will slow the economy.

And yet the economy boomed following Clinton's tax hike and then again following Obama's.

So much for your nonsensical talking point.

 

[The Duke]

And yet the economy boomed following Clinton's tax hike and then again following Obama's.

So much for your nonsensical talking point.

The country never boomed from anything Obama and the rise of the internet was what happened during Clinton. Meanwhile, Clinton set up Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, started the government backing student loans, and signed NAFTA. Oh, and gave our missile tech to China.

 

[Dagosa]

Keep up your insults, keep up your climate change pledge as there is an entire country that banks on people like you (China).

Not insults, but facts. Anyone you doubts the consensus findings of every climate research facility, every university and every government agency IN THE WORLD, is a FOOL.

There has been nothing in recent history, other then trickle down economics that the right has been so much on the wrong side of as this issue. Even you lemmings are being deserted by one time deniers in the gop congress. It’s hilarious. You little mice are going down in the ship of fools.

 

[Dagosa]

The country never boomed from anything Obama and the rise of the internet was what happened during Clinton. Meanwhile, Clinton set up Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, started the government backing student loans, and signed NAFTA. Oh, and gave our missile tech to China.

All of which never resulted in economic chaos like it did with Bush. Clinton crowd actually regulated bank investments. Under Bush, they were free to play Russian Roulette. Sure, keep mentioning Clinton as the cause of a recession 8 years later. It takes a fool to do that.

 

[Faun]

The country never boomed from anything Obama and the rise of the internet was what happened during Clinton. Meanwhile, Clinton set up Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, started the government backing student loans, and signed NAFTA. Oh, and gave our missile tech to China.

Poor baby.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Not insults, but facts. Anyone you doubts the consensus findings of every climate research facility, every university and every government agency IN THE WORLD, is a FOOL.

There has been nothing in recent history, other then trickle down economics that the right has been so much on the wrong side of as this issue. Even you lemmings are being deserted by one time deniers in the gop congress. It’s hilarious. You little mice are going down in the ship of fools.

Foolishness is believing China is on board with Climate Change and that they are accountable to global initiatives such as the Paris Accords. Facts are, China’s emissions continue to rise as they continue coal plant expansion.

The Climate activists ignore China because ultimately, this is an economic argument, not a science argument.