So Flake wants a week long FBI investigation

[DrLove]

it's other republicans that want it before voting, and in order to get yes votes from all republicans, they have to do it... if they get a yes vote for kavanaugh from all republicans, then kavanaugh will be the next justice without a single democratic vote needed.

This just gives the Dem's another week to come up with more nonsense to further delay the vote.

The Dem's end game is to keep delaying the vote until after the elections in the hope they will win enough seats to get control, and put their own nominee on the Supreme Court. ....

That's a brilliant idea - how did you know? I mean, it's not like Mitch McTurtle didn't refuse to hold a hearing on Garland for almost a year because it was "too close to the election". What goes around comes around.

Not holding a hearing does not equate to ruining a man's life with unprovable accusations from 35ish years ago, since she cannot even remember when it happened.

She remembered the important things.
Nuff said

 

[Indeependent]

Here's the thing: None of the alleged witnesses are obligated to speak to the FBI.

Having witnessed the debacle the Democrats created, would you talk to them? I sure wouldn't.

What smelly crack did you pull this one from? They can simply show up with a subpoena.

http://www.dallascriminalattorney.pro/blog/what-to-do-if-the-fbi-contacts-you/

Correct - but if they show up with a subpoena and take you in -
You may be entitled to have your attorney present, but they WILL be talking to you.
They have many ways of legally applying pressure.
Don't lie

You stupid lying pos.
Flake said no subpeonas.

 

[Valerie]

velly intellesting choice of words here:


“All four witnesses say it didn’t happen.”



WITNESSES to what?

he didn't say 'alleged witnesses', he slipped up and called them what they really were..WITNESSES.


NO, all 4 witnesses DID NOT say that "it didn't happen".

your bully bros are all claiming they CAN'T RECALL.

and her friend is suffering some sort of illness and couldn't recall but stated support for Dr Ford as an honest witness.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

it's other republicans that want it before voting, and in order to get yes votes from all republicans, they have to do it... if they get a yes vote for kavanaugh from all republicans, then kavanaugh will be the next justice without a single democratic vote needed.

This just gives the Dem's another week to come up with more nonsense to further delay the vote.

The Dem's end game is to keep delaying the vote until after the elections in the hope they will win enough seats to get control, and put their own nominee on the Supreme Court. ....

That's a brilliant idea - how did you know? I mean, it's not like Mitch McTurtle didn't refuse to hold a hearing on Garland for almost a year because it was "too close to the election". What goes around comes around.

Not holding a hearing does not equate to ruining a man's life with unprovable accusations from 35ish years ago, since she cannot even remember when it happened.

She remembered the important things.
Nuff said

So far the evidence points to she made up the "important" things. She has zero evidence, zero corroborating witnesses and does not even know the year, the month or what house it took place in.

This was never about sexual assault and always about political payback

 

[OldLady]

Here's the thing: None of the alleged witnesses are obligated to speak to the FBI.

Having witnessed the debacle the Democrats created, would you talk to them? I sure wouldn't.

What smelly crack did you pull this one from? They can simply show up with a subpoena.

http://www.dallascriminalattorney.pro/blog/what-to-do-if-the-fbi-contacts-you/

Correct - but if they show up with a subpoena and take you in -
You may be entitled to have your attorney present, but they WILL be talking to you.
They have many ways of legally applying pressure.
Don't lie

Do you remember that guy who was having a manic episode and was going to all the news channels saying he refused to meet with ...FBI or Mueller...about the Russia investigation because the man he was supposed to be interviewed about was his mentor, a hero, blah blah blah?
I just remember him talking to Erin whatshername on CNN, who got him talked down enough to admit the real reason he didn't want to talk to them--the next day, after no doubt someone shoved his meds down his throat, he agreed to testify.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

FBI has alrdy said there is nothing to investigate.

Post a link to that or STFU.
The FBI has not made a statement about Kavanaugh and Ford.
They did not investigate allegations of sexual molestation in previous background checks.
.
..
.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Here's the thing: None of the alleged witnesses are obligated to speak to the FBI.

Having witnessed the debacle the Democrats created, would you talk to them? I sure wouldn't.

What smelly crack did you pull this one from? They can simply show up with a subpoena.

http://www.dallascriminalattorney.pro/blog/what-to-do-if-the-fbi-contacts-you/

Correct - but if they show up with a subpoena and take you in -
You may be entitled to have your attorney present, but they WILL be talking to you.

You are under no obligation to talk back.

They have many ways of legally applying pressure.
Don't lie

On the TV, maybe.

It's highly doubtful the Democrats would want a heavy hand applied to witnesses they seek as support.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

velly intellesting choice of words here:


“All four witnesses say it didn’t happen.”



WITNESSES to what?

he didn't say 'alleged witnesses', he slipped up and called them what they really were..WITNESSES.


NO, all 4 witnesses DID NOT say that "it didn't happen".

your bully bros are all claiming they CAN'T RECALL.

and her friend is suffering some sort of illness and couldn't recall but stated support for her friend as an honest witness.

He used the word WITNESSES because Ford claimed they were.

you should stop while you are behind

 

[Harpy Eagle]

FBI has alrdy said there is nothing to investigate.

Post a link to that or STFU.
The FBI has not made a statement about Kavanaugh and Ford.
They did not investigate allegations of sexual molestation in previous background checks.
.
..
.

That is because there was nothing to investigate

 

[OldLady]

it's other republicans that want it before voting, and in order to get yes votes from all republicans, they have to do it... if they get a yes vote for kavanaugh from all republicans, then kavanaugh will be the next justice without a single democratic vote needed.

This just gives the Dem's another week to come up with more nonsense to further delay the vote.

The Dem's end game is to keep delaying the vote until after the elections in the hope they will win enough seats to get control, and put their own nominee on the Supreme Court. ....

That's a brilliant idea - how did you know? I mean, it's not like Mitch McTurtle didn't refuse to hold a hearing on Garland for almost a year because it was "too close to the election". What goes around comes around.

Not holding a hearing does not equate to ruining a man's life with unprovable accusations from 35ish years ago, since she cannot even remember when it happened.

She remembered the important things.
Nuff said

So far the evidence points to she made up the "important" things. She has zero evidence, zero corroborating witnesses and does not even know the year, the month or what house it took place in.

This was never about sexual assault and always about political payback

That is pretty much off the table--way too much evidence that is not the motivation here.

 

[BS Filter]

Flake is obviously a rookie and hasn't learned yet that the leftist jackals will stab him in the back later on down the road. They're playing nicey nice now and he thinks he's making bipartisan friends. He'll learn.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Republicans surely know the out come if the FBI is allowed to investigate. All that is going to happen is after a week whatever comes out Flake will be pressured once again by the democrats to say something along the lines of with this new information I think we need to postpone the vote for more time, or with this new information I can't vote for Kavanaugh. It's nothing but further stalling and going in circles accomplishing nothing.

Flake said it isn't so much to get more info as to extinguish the complaints from the Democrats that an investigation wasn't done.

Why does that even matter? They have all said before the allegations they would not vote for him, so who gives a fuck if they have some complaints?

You would have to ask Senator Flake why he cares about half of the country's voters. Something to do with divisiveness, he says...

What is more divisive than unprovable allegations that were held on to for more than a month and then trotted out at just the right time to delay things till the new year?

Why do you keep asking ME?
As for the delay, it didn't bother you to delay filling Scalia's seat for a year. So what's the big rush?

Actually I was against that move by the Repubs, I felt they were not doing their duty.

That is the difference between you and I, I do not view the whole world through the partisan sheep brain that you use.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Flake is obviously a rookie and hasn't learned yet that the leftist jackals will stab him in the back later on down the road. They're playing nicey nice now and he thinks he's making bipartisan friends. He'll learn.

Flake is retiring, he could not give a shit.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Pray for your Constitution guys, it's in the crosshairs.

I know I will be praying from afar. There is more at stake right now in the hands of a VERY small number than even I could have appreciated just a few months ago. There is a heavy push from the global socialists to ruin America, how else can you see so many people worth tens of millions of dollars as career politicians?

 

[Flash]

This is why no one likes you Arizona.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

it's other republicans that want it before voting, and in order to get yes votes from all republicans, they have to do it... if they get a yes vote for kavanaugh from all republicans, then kavanaugh will be the next justice without a single democratic vote needed.

This just gives the Dem's another week to come up with more nonsense to further delay the vote.

The Dem's end game is to keep delaying the vote until after the elections in the hope they will win enough seats to get control, and put their own nominee on the Supreme Court. ....

That's a brilliant idea - how did you know? I mean, it's not like Mitch McTurtle didn't refuse to hold a hearing on Garland for almost a year because it was "too close to the election". What goes around comes around.

Not holding a hearing does not equate to ruining a man's life with unprovable accusations from 35ish years ago, since she cannot even remember when it happened.

She remembered the important things.
Nuff said

So far the evidence points to she made up the "important" things. She has zero evidence, zero corroborating witnesses and does not even know the year, the month or what house it took place in.

This was never about sexual assault and always about political payback

Wrong.
Maybe you didn't watch her testimony:
"
In the summer of 1982, like most summers, I spent almost every day at the Columbia Country Club in Chevy Chase, Maryland swimming and practicing diving.
One evening that summer, after a day of swimming at the club, I attended a small gathering at a house in the Chevy Chase/Bethesda area. There were four boys I remember being there: Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth, and one other boy whose name I cannot recall. """"

Full transcript: Christine Blasey Ford's opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee
.
.
.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

This just gives the Dem's another week to come up with more nonsense to further delay the vote.

The Dem's end game is to keep delaying the vote until after the elections in the hope they will win enough seats to get control, and put their own nominee on the Supreme Court. ....

That's a brilliant idea - how did you know? I mean, it's not like Mitch McTurtle didn't refuse to hold a hearing on Garland for almost a year because it was "too close to the election". What goes around comes around.

Not holding a hearing does not equate to ruining a man's life with unprovable accusations from 35ish years ago, since she cannot even remember when it happened.

She remembered the important things.
Nuff said

So far the evidence points to she made up the "important" things. She has zero evidence, zero corroborating witnesses and does not even know the year, the month or what house it took place in.

This was never about sexual assault and always about political payback

That is pretty much off the table--way too much evidence that is not the motivation here.

Everything points to a political hit job, nothing more. The timing, the lack of details, the constant stalling.

This has politics all over it

 

[task0778]

FBI has alrdy said there is nothing to investigate.

Post a link to that or STFU.
The FBI has not made a statement about Kavanaugh and Ford.
They did not investigate allegations of sexual molestation in previous background checks.
.
..
.

Oh? And you know this how? What allegations existed against Kavanaugh prior to a couple of weeks ago, after the FBI completed their 6th and last background check?

 

[OldLady]

Republicans surely know the out come if the FBI is allowed to investigate. All that is going to happen is after a week whatever comes out Flake will be pressured once again by the democrats to say something along the lines of with this new information I think we need to postpone the vote for more time, or with this new information I can't vote for Kavanaugh. It's nothing but further stalling and going in circles accomplishing nothing.

A lying strict constructionist who was a boozing teen who molested teenaged girls is still better on the SCOTUS than Ginsberg.

And that seems to be what you are getting.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

This just gives the Dem's another week to come up with more nonsense to further delay the vote.

The Dem's end game is to keep delaying the vote until after the elections in the hope they will win enough seats to get control, and put their own nominee on the Supreme Court. ....

That's a brilliant idea - how did you know? I mean, it's not like Mitch McTurtle didn't refuse to hold a hearing on Garland for almost a year because it was "too close to the election". What goes around comes around.

Not holding a hearing does not equate to ruining a man's life with unprovable accusations from 35ish years ago, since she cannot even remember when it happened.

She remembered the important things.
Nuff said

So far the evidence points to she made up the "important" things. She has zero evidence, zero corroborating witnesses and does not even know the year, the month or what house it took place in.

This was never about sexual assault and always about political payback

Wrong.
Maybe you didn't watch her testimony:
"
In the summer of 1982, like most summers, I spent almost every day at the Columbia Country Club in Chevy Chase, Maryland swimming and practicing diving.
One evening that summer, after a day of swimming at the club, I attended a small gathering at a house in the Chevy Chase/Bethesda area. There were four boys I remember being there: Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth, and one other boy whose name I cannot recall. """"

Full transcript: Christine Blasey Ford's opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee
.
.
.

Oh, she finally "remembered" the year. How convenient the timing of that was