So....how many posters do we have who have heard of this INCEL Movement?

[danielpalos]

dear, stop being repugnant to State law regarding the legal concept of employment at the will of either party.

dear, stop making up what you thing that means.

dear, stop pretending you know anything about the concepts we are discussing.

I have shown you are clueless about the things you post, and you want me to stop pretending?

Your version of equality is you getting a check and the employer getting screwed. But I know nothing?

YOu want to live of other people's taxes, and cannot draw welfare because of the means test (because your mother pays for your basic needs) so you demand unemployment compensation. Despite the fact you voluntarily quit your last job and have not tried to get another one. And I am the one who knows nothing?

No Daniel, you are the one who are pretending you know anything about the concepts. Or maybe you do know something about economics and just ignore what you know because you want a check for luxuries while you do nothing.

Why are you entitled to an income without working, when others have to work to provide it for you?

You simple make up your own stories.

Employees could quit on better terms with their employers, on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Not having to deal with wage-slaves is better for any employer.

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

 

[danielpalos]

equal protection of the law is in our Constitutions.

Indeed it is. And you have equal protection under the law. That does not mean that you can quit your job, thereby depriving the employer of your labor, and you still draw a check.

If you want to be a free man, you have to take responsibility for the consequences of your choices. You chose to quit your job. The consequence is not getting paid.

Enforce the law right wingers. Don't be hypocrites and blame the least wealthy for allegedly being lazy.

equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation is a better solution.

Only for those who opt out of working and still want to get paid. For the rest of us it is not a good solution.

lol.

why is that, dear?

You are weapons-grade stupid and lazy.

Don't ask me to feel sorry for you if you can't get laid.

lol.

it is about equal protection of the law, "johnny come lately".

It doesn't take long to see you for what you are.

advocating for equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States?

 

[WinterBorn]

Work every day and get BJs every day if you want. If you don't wanna work and make money, you ain't gettin' a damn thing, dumbass!
Chances are hella slim you'll run across a nymphomaniac that might fuck you every now and then, maybe, sometimes, and even then, you're feeding her sickness, is that right?

equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation is a better solution.

Only for those who opt out of working and still want to get paid. For the rest of us it is not a good solution.

lol.

why is that, dear?

Your version has you changing the unemployment compensation from a tax paid by businesses to a general tax, and has you collecting a check for nothing. That means my tax dollars are going to pay for your luxuries.

what does that mean for employers?

It means they lose the labor for which they gave you a check, and their taxes go up because you want money for luxuries without having to work for it.

 

[danielpalos]

equal protection of the law is in our Constitutions.

Indeed it is. And you have equal protection under the law. That does not mean that you can quit your job, thereby depriving the employer of your labor, and you still draw a check.

If you want to be a free man, you have to take responsibility for the consequences of your choices. You chose to quit your job. The consequence is not getting paid.

Enforce the law right wingers. Don't be hypocrites and blame the least wealthy for allegedly being lazy.

"allegedly"??? You quit your last job a few years ago, and have refused to get another one. YOu want money and sex, but refuse to work at all. I'd call that a textbook definition of lazy.

any story teller can make up a story like that. what is so special about yours?

It is the Truth. In a discussion with you that is special.

lol. you make up stories, story teller.

i resort to the fewest fallacies, every time those of the opposing view, call me on it.

 

[WinterBorn]

dear, stop making up what you thing that means.

dear, stop pretending you know anything about the concepts we are discussing.

I have shown you are clueless about the things you post, and you want me to stop pretending?

Your version of equality is you getting a check and the employer getting screwed. But I know nothing?

YOu want to live of other people's taxes, and cannot draw welfare because of the means test (because your mother pays for your basic needs) so you demand unemployment compensation. Despite the fact you voluntarily quit your last job and have not tried to get another one. And I am the one who knows nothing?

No Daniel, you are the one who are pretending you know anything about the concepts. Or maybe you do know something about economics and just ignore what you know because you want a check for luxuries while you do nothing.

Why are you entitled to an income without working, when others have to work to provide it for you?

You simple make up your own stories.

Employees could quit on better terms with their employers, on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Not having to deal with wage-slaves is better for any employer.

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

Homelessness again? I thought you dropped that topic after I shredded your, so called, solutions.

What does your refusal to even TRY to get a job have to do with the natural unemployment rate?

 

[danielpalos]

equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation is a better solution.

Only for those who opt out of working and still want to get paid. For the rest of us it is not a good solution.

lol.

why is that, dear?

Your version has you changing the unemployment compensation from a tax paid by businesses to a general tax, and has you collecting a check for nothing. That means my tax dollars are going to pay for your luxuries.

what does that mean for employers?

It means they lose the labor for which they gave you a check, and their taxes go up because you want money for luxuries without having to work for it.

it means they don't have to deal with wage-slave who Have to work and may litigate if he fires them.

 

[WinterBorn]

Indeed it is. And you have equal protection under the law. That does not mean that you can quit your job, thereby depriving the employer of your labor, and you still draw a check.

If you want to be a free man, you have to take responsibility for the consequences of your choices. You chose to quit your job. The consequence is not getting paid.

Enforce the law right wingers. Don't be hypocrites and blame the least wealthy for allegedly being lazy.

Only for those who opt out of working and still want to get paid. For the rest of us it is not a good solution.

lol.

why is that, dear?

You are weapons-grade stupid and lazy.

Don't ask me to feel sorry for you if you can't get laid.

lol.

it is about equal protection of the law, "johnny come lately".

It doesn't take long to see you for what you are.

advocating for equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States?

If you were advocating for equal protection, I would agree with you. You aren't.

 

[danielpalos]

dear, stop pretending you know anything about the concepts we are discussing.

I have shown you are clueless about the things you post, and you want me to stop pretending?

Your version of equality is you getting a check and the employer getting screwed. But I know nothing?

YOu want to live of other people's taxes, and cannot draw welfare because of the means test (because your mother pays for your basic needs) so you demand unemployment compensation. Despite the fact you voluntarily quit your last job and have not tried to get another one. And I am the one who knows nothing?

No Daniel, you are the one who are pretending you know anything about the concepts. Or maybe you do know something about economics and just ignore what you know because you want a check for luxuries while you do nothing.

Why are you entitled to an income without working, when others have to work to provide it for you?

You simple make up your own stories.

Employees could quit on better terms with their employers, on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Not having to deal with wage-slaves is better for any employer.

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

Homelessness again? I thought you dropped that topic after I shredded your, so called, solutions.

What does your refusal to even TRY to get a job have to do with the natural unemployment rate?

lol. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment State is a more economical solution.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I have shown you are clueless about the things you post, and you want me to stop pretending?

Your version of equality is you getting a check and the employer getting screwed. But I know nothing?

YOu want to live of other people's taxes, and cannot draw welfare because of the means test (because your mother pays for your basic needs) so you demand unemployment compensation. Despite the fact you voluntarily quit your last job and have not tried to get another one. And I am the one who knows nothing?

No Daniel, you are the one who are pretending you know anything about the concepts. Or maybe you do know something about economics and just ignore what you know because you want a check for luxuries while you do nothing.

Why are you entitled to an income without working, when others have to work to provide it for you?

You simple make up your own stories.

Employees could quit on better terms with their employers, on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Not having to deal with wage-slaves is better for any employer.

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

Homelessness again? I thought you dropped that topic after I shredded your, so called, solutions.

What does your refusal to even TRY to get a job have to do with the natural unemployment rate?

lol. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment State is a more economical solution.

lol, you're a loser, get a job.

 

[danielpalos]

Enforce the law right wingers. Don't be hypocrites and blame the least wealthy for allegedly being lazy.

lol.

why is that, dear?

You are weapons-grade stupid and lazy.

Don't ask me to feel sorry for you if you can't get laid.

lol.

it is about equal protection of the law, "johnny come lately".

It doesn't take long to see you for what you are.

advocating for equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States?

If you were advocating for equal protection, I would agree with you. You aren't.

that is Your story, story teller. equal protection of the law means labor can quit on an at-will basis and collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

 

[WinterBorn]

Indeed it is. And you have equal protection under the law. That does not mean that you can quit your job, thereby depriving the employer of your labor, and you still draw a check.

If you want to be a free man, you have to take responsibility for the consequences of your choices. You chose to quit your job. The consequence is not getting paid.

Enforce the law right wingers. Don't be hypocrites and blame the least wealthy for allegedly being lazy.

"allegedly"??? You quit your last job a few years ago, and have refused to get another one. YOu want money and sex, but refuse to work at all. I'd call that a textbook definition of lazy.

any story teller can make up a story like that. what is so special about yours?

It is the Truth. In a discussion with you that is special.

lol. you make up stories, story teller.

i resort to the fewest fallacies, every time those of the opposing view, call me on it.

LMAO!! YOu still make that claim? That is hilarious. Funny, you have never been able to point to a single logical fallacy, and yet you claim I post them all the time.

 

[danielpalos]

You simple make up your own stories.

Employees could quit on better terms with their employers, on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.

Not having to deal with wage-slaves is better for any employer.

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

Homelessness again? I thought you dropped that topic after I shredded your, so called, solutions.

What does your refusal to even TRY to get a job have to do with the natural unemployment rate?

lol. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment State is a more economical solution.

lol, you're a loser, get a job.

lol. you are a bigger loser for having nothing but fallacy and always losing your arguments to me.

 

[WinterBorn]

Only for those who opt out of working and still want to get paid. For the rest of us it is not a good solution.

lol.

why is that, dear?

Your version has you changing the unemployment compensation from a tax paid by businesses to a general tax, and has you collecting a check for nothing. That means my tax dollars are going to pay for your luxuries.

what does that mean for employers?

It means they lose the labor for which they gave you a check, and their taxes go up because you want money for luxuries without having to work for it.

it means they don't have to deal with wage-slave who Have to work and may litigate if he fires them.

They don't HAVE to work. They work if they want or need money.

How can they litigate in an at-will state?

 

[danielpalos]

Enforce the law right wingers. Don't be hypocrites and blame the least wealthy for allegedly being lazy.

"allegedly"??? You quit your last job a few years ago, and have refused to get another one. YOu want money and sex, but refuse to work at all. I'd call that a textbook definition of lazy.

any story teller can make up a story like that. what is so special about yours?

It is the Truth. In a discussion with you that is special.

lol. you make up stories, story teller.

i resort to the fewest fallacies, every time those of the opposing view, call me on it.

LMAO!! YOu still make that claim? That is hilarious. Funny, you have never been able to point to a single logical fallacy, and yet you claim I post them all the time.

lol. funny how you have nothing but fallacy instead of any valid arguments.

 

[WinterBorn]

You are weapons-grade stupid and lazy.

Don't ask me to feel sorry for you if you can't get laid.

lol.

it is about equal protection of the law, "johnny come lately".

It doesn't take long to see you for what you are.

advocating for equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States?

If you were advocating for equal protection, I would agree with you. You aren't.

that is Your story, story teller. equal protection of the law means labor can quit on an at-will basis and collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

No, it does not.

 

[WinterBorn]

"allegedly"??? You quit your last job a few years ago, and have refused to get another one. YOu want money and sex, but refuse to work at all. I'd call that a textbook definition of lazy.

any story teller can make up a story like that. what is so special about yours?

It is the Truth. In a discussion with you that is special.

lol. you make up stories, story teller.

i resort to the fewest fallacies, every time those of the opposing view, call me on it.

LMAO!! YOu still make that claim? That is hilarious. Funny, you have never been able to point to a single logical fallacy, and yet you claim I post them all the time.

lol. funny how you have nothing but fallacy instead of any valid arguments.

Thanks for proving my point.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

Homelessness again? I thought you dropped that topic after I shredded your, so called, solutions.

What does your refusal to even TRY to get a job have to do with the natural unemployment rate?

lol. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment State is a more economical solution.

lol, you're a loser, get a job.

lol. you are a bigger loser for having nothing but fallacy and always losing your arguments to me.

I don't think so. I have cash on hand, bills are paid, food in my fridge, and I could hire hookers if I wanted to.
Looking for something more permanent and less concerned about shopping for Prada. Pray for me.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have left a few jobs, usually by putting in notice. I never had any problems with my employers. In fact, on two occasions I went back to work for them.

"wage-slaves" is a nonsense term.

why does capitalism have a natural rate of unemployment and why do we have any homelessness?

your understanding of economics, is nonsense.

Homelessness again? I thought you dropped that topic after I shredded your, so called, solutions.

What does your refusal to even TRY to get a job have to do with the natural unemployment rate?

lol. unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed in our at-will employment State is a more economical solution.

lol, you're a loser, get a job.

lol. you are a bigger loser for having nothing but fallacy and always losing your arguments to me.

Your claims of victory in these arguments is simply more proof of your delusions of adequacy.

 

[danielpalos]

lol.

why is that, dear?

Your version has you changing the unemployment compensation from a tax paid by businesses to a general tax, and has you collecting a check for nothing. That means my tax dollars are going to pay for your luxuries.

what does that mean for employers?

It means they lose the labor for which they gave you a check, and their taxes go up because you want money for luxuries without having to work for it.

it means they don't have to deal with wage-slave who Have to work and may litigate if he fires them.

They don't HAVE to work. They work if they want or need money.

How can they litigate in an at-will state?

he won't have to deal with them at all if they can simply apply for unemployment compensation instead.

that alone can save employers a lot of costs that would otherwise to court expenses.

 

[danielpalos]

lol.

it is about equal protection of the law, "johnny come lately".

It doesn't take long to see you for what you are.

advocating for equal protection of the law in our at-will employment States?

If you were advocating for equal protection, I would agree with you. You aren't.

that is Your story, story teller. equal protection of the law means labor can quit on an at-will basis and collect unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

No, it does not.

Yes, it does. that is what at-will means.