Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 97,134
- 73,351
It'ss not even an argument. And your claims are not new. Again, go peddle it to someone dumber.I have deemed that your argument is invalid and therefore I will simply not address it"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
It'ss not even an argument. And your claims are not new. Again, go peddle it to someone dumber.I have deemed that your argument is invalid and therefore I will simply not address it"
EXACTLY! these claims have been made by other people, which is why i ask, should they not be investigated?And your claims are not new.
STFU and go read a book! I taught government off and on for 21 years and took lots of political science classes in college.No. You remain absolutely incorrect.
You seriously need to educate yourself, dumbass!No. We don’t.
You indicated that you knew why "republic turned the offer down because the former president and supporters don't want any light shown on 1/6". You would have to be a mind reader to know that was the real reason.Sorry, don't get the attempted joke.
Don't have to be a mind reader, you just need to look at court filings, false claims of executive privilege and sycophant supporters.You indicated that you knew why "republic turned the offer down because the former president and supporters don't want any light shown on 1/6". You would have to be a mind reader to know that was the real reason.
It ought to just go away, but there are more than enough Stockholm syndrome GOPers who will want to keep it around. Optics I guess.Will the dems make a quick decision and convict Trump for whatever
And dissolve the committee so republicans can't "pollute" their kangaroo court
Will the GOP coop it, and turn it to their way of things. Which is what I would like to see. Uncover these undercover trouble makers and their chain of command. File charges against Michael Bird.
Or will it just go away.
It’s a shame you didn’t get it. And still don’t. So instead of pontificating all about your incorrect understanding, it is you who would benefit by shitting the fuck up.STFU and go read a book! I taught government off and on for 21 years and took lots of political science classes in college.
Here is the link again. You can read, I hope!
The United States, under its Constitution, is a federal, representative, democratic republic.
I seriously need to educate you, ya dumbfucj. But it appears you are not educable.You seriously need to educate yourself, dumbass!
We're a representative Democracy.I seriously need to educate you, ya dumbfucj. But it appears you are not educable.
No. We are not. We were and remain a representative Republic.We're a representative Democracy.
What about my source, fucktard? Can you not read?It’s a shame you didn’t get it. And still don’t. So instead of pontificating all about your incorrect understanding, it is you who would benefit by shitting the fuck up.
We are a Consriturional Republic.
Of course we have some elements of a democracy, but the point is that we intentionally placed barriers between the rule of the people and the making of laws. If you don’t get that, than I pity those you “taught.”.
Sorry, no we are not.No. We are not. We were and remain a representative Republic.
Hey, shit for brains:What about my source, fucktard? Can you not read?
I’m sorry that you feel obliged to remain wrong. But, yes. We are.Sorry, no we are not.
Who elects the Elecctoral College? Is that not democracy?Hey, shit for brains:
You are citing to a congressional resolution about a book which, they imagined describes the US government. It makes a claim (one which you ignorantly believe is accurate) and you somehow think that it obliges anybody else to accept their error.
It doesn’t.
Put your unjustifiably massive ego on a back burner. Just because you’ve been informed that we are a representative “democracy” doesn’t mean we are. And we’re not.
Educate yourself.
If we were a democracy, there wouldn’t be an Electoral College. The candidate who gets the most popular votes would become the elected President. So, if we were intended to be a democracy, why did the Framers include an Electoral College? Don’t worry Commodore. It’s not a trick question.
Amongst all the separation of powers and the checks and balances such as the precepts of Federalism and tools such as the Electoral College, the Framers were busy putting into effect measures specifically designed to make sure that, on the national level, at least, we wouldn’t be a democracy.
It disappears-----but impeaching Biden replaces it.Will the dems make a quick decision and convict Trump for whatever
And dissolve the committee so republicans can't "pollute" their kangaroo court
Will the GOP coop it, and turn it to their way of things. Which is what I would like to see. Uncover these undercover trouble makers and their chain of command. File charges against Michael Bird.
Or will it just go away.
That article talks about a direct democracy which has not existed since ancient Greece's city-states.I recognize that the Heritage Foundation is maligned by many on the left and even a few on the right. To that I say: don’t commit the fallacy of attacking the messenger. Instead, even if you find the proponent of an argument to be disagreeable or odious, maybe consider addressing the actual arguments offered.
![]()
America Is a Republic, Not a Democracy
Contrary to popular belief, America is not, nor was it meant to be, a pure democracy. America is a republic. Nevertheless, more and more voices today are calling for America to become a direct democracy.www.heritage.org